behave Cider
Busquets and Alonso yes, Martinez potentially yes. The others certainly not. You'de have to be out of your mind to play Mascherano, Pepe or Silva ahead of Micheal Carrick, completely bonkers.
I can think of a significant number of players who'd be better at Carrick's role than Michael Carrick is:
Sergio Busquets
Xabi Alonso
Thiago Silva
Javier Macherano
Ferreira Pepe
Javi Martinez
Sami Khedira
Arturo Vidal
I'm not trying to stag off Carrick, he's a great player and that, but he's not a better player than Wayne Rooney; not unless you distort the meaning of the word 'better' to 'only one who can play his role in whichever particular squad he happens to be a member of at any given moment'.
Some great passes there, but they're few and far between from Carrick. You could pick out more or less the same selection of Wayne Rooney from Sunday's game against Stoke alone.
A rare terrible post from you Cider, I'm kinda speechless tbh when I read that the likes of Silva, Mascherano, Pepe and even Javi Martinez are all better than Carrick.Khedira is an entirely different player so I have no idea how you can think he'd be better than him there
By any definition of 'world-class' which isn't literally the best player in the world in their position then of course he is. He is, at very worst, the second best central midfielder in one of the best leagues in the world (and he's been better than Yaya this season).
Martinez was my absolute dream signing prior to last summer, he would have been the perfect long-term replacement for Carrick. In addition the transfer saga would likely have literally killed a number of muppets, so it was a blow in more than one sense to see him sign for Bayern.
The list was based from a purely defensive point of view due to the fact that I obviously don't rate Carrick's influence in the attacking phase as highly as most on here seem to. In terms of breaking up opposition play I believe that all those players can do it better job than Carrick from a CM position than he does; and imo that's by far the most important aspect of Carrick's game for United.
Everyone seems to disagree though so I concede that I'm probably wrong.
The list was based from a purely defensive point of view due to the fact that I obviously don't rate Carrick's influence in the attacking phase as highly as most on here seem to. In terms of breaking up opposition play I believe that all those players can do it better job than Carrick from a CM position; and imo that's by far the most important aspect of Carrick's game for United.
Everyone seems to disagree though so I concede that I'm probably wrong; it's difficult to disagree with a lot of the arguments to the contrary.
The list was based from a purely defensive point of view due to the fact that I obviously don't rate Carrick's influence in the attacking phase as highly as most on here seem to. In terms of breaking up opposition play I believe that all those players can do it better job than Carrick from a CM position; and imo that's by far the most important aspect of Carrick's game for United.
Everyone seems to disagree though so I concede that I'm probably wrong; it's difficult to disagree with a lot of the arguments to the contrary.
Don't agree with that, don't think he's World Class, despite how good he has been this season.
First of all, we can't judge a player based on one season. He has been brilliant, no doubt, but surely he'd have to maintain this level for more than one season for it to be considered his natural level? It's unfair to judge other players on their form over a few seasons while judging Carrick only at his peak.
Second, even if he was the best midfielder in the league that wouldn't automatically make him world class. By that logic there should be a fair few world class right backs in the league, but I don't see that many. You should judge players based on their actual quality rather than how many other players there are in a league/team that are better than them.
This.
If offered a straight swap Martinez I would take on potential/age. Alonso I wouldn't actually bother to take on the adjustment risk, marginally better really. Busquets is the standout, head and shoulders above the rest.
He was just as good last season though; arguably better. I had him as our player of the year last season.
Carrick deserves to be the Man United player of the season
Good call. I can see him winning the players' vote, certainly.
Carrick deserves to be the Man United player of the season
I don't think you could pick out any pass from Rooney this season that rivals the quality of his assist to Hernández v Chelsea or the importance of his assist to Hernández v Newcastle. He's not consistently playing those passes week in, week out but then no-one is. If he's doing that once a month then he's still doing it more often than anyone besides Pirlo and possibly Schweinsteiger. What he is doing week in, week out is stuff like this:
And then he's backing it up with a kind of swagger he's never shown before.
There's plenty of them really, he's a good player but not amongst the very best midfielders in the world. Busquets, Schweinsteiger, Toure, Alonso, Macherano (in his liverpool days), Martinez (arguably just as good, albeit different type of midfielder) and Vidal are all individually better players and would probably be better options there. That's not taking into account if we took a different type of midfield partnership, like having Modric or Gundogan in there next to someone. He's a very important member to our team and a very good player, but he's not one of the best midfielders in the world, and he wouldn't be this important to us if we had better options.
I can think of a significant number of players who'd be better at Carrick's role than Michael Carrick is:
Sergio Busquets
Xabi Alonso
Thiago Silva
Javier Macherano
Ferreira Pepe
Javi Martinez
Sami Khedira
Arturo Vidal
I'm not trying to stag off Carrick, he's a great player and that, but he's not a better player than Wayne Rooney; not unless you distort the meaning of the word 'better' to 'only one who can play his role in whichever particular squad he happens to be a member of at any given moment'.
I can think of a significant number of players who'd be better at Carrick's role than Michael Carrick is:
Sergio Busquets
Xabi Alonso
Thiago Silva
Javier Macherano
Ferreira Pepe
Javi Martinez
Sami Khedira
Arturo Vidal
I'm not trying to stag off Carrick, he's a great player and that, but he's not a better player than Wayne Rooney; not unless you distort the meaning of the word 'better' to 'only one who can play his role in whichever particular squad he happens to be a member of at any given moment'.
The list was based from a purely defensive point of view due to the fact that I obviously don't rate Carrick's influence in the attacking phase as highly as most on here seem to. In terms of breaking up opposition play I believe that all those players can do it better job than Carrick from a CM position (whether they're traditionally CB's or not, they're all very strong DM's also); and imo that's by far the most important aspect of Carrick's game for United.
Everyone seems to disagree though so I concede that I'm probably wrong; it's difficult to disagree with a lot of the arguments to the contrary.
Exclusive - Michael Carrick says Manchester United 'hurt' by cup failures despite title romp
Michael Carrick admits Manchester United are hurting from their recent failures in the FA Cup and Champions League.
United are on the brink of landing a 20th league title, with Sir Alex Ferguson’s side 15 points ahead of Manchester City with only six games left of the season.
For Carrick it will be the fifth time he has lifted the trophy in his Old Trafford career and will add to an already impressive list of honours, which includes a Champions League winner’s medal.
But the midfielder has expressed his dismay at having never won the FA Cup after a quarter-final exit at the hands of Chelsea at the start of the month extended United’s drought in the competition to nine years.
In an exclusive interview with talkSPORT, Carrick said: “It hurts. I’ve come close, I’ve played in the final, been in semi-finals and, for whatever reason, it hasn’t fallen for us and we haven’t been able to win it.
“It hurts because this club should be winning the FA Cup, especially having had such a successful period over the last six, seven, eight years. For a club like this not to win it over that period of time is criminal.
“It hurts the players because not many of us have won it. Hopefully, we have still got time to grab it, whether it be next season or after that.
“It does get mentioned [among the players] because we are desperate to win it. It is what I grew up watching. The FA Cup was the game of the season when I was younger and such a special day. We have come close, losing to Chelsea in the final, but we want to go better than that.”
And Carrick has revealed United are also hungry to reach the top in Europe again.
United were Champions League victors in 2008 and runners-up in 2009 and 2011 but failed to advance through their group last year and were dumped out by Real Madrid in controversial fashion at the last-16 stage this season.
“It hurts because we want to win and we have come close to winning it more than we have, in terms of the two Champions League finals we have lost,” continued Carrick.
“We have taken a lot of stick for that but we were there to be shot at, we were there in the final. We managed to get to three finals in four years, which shows we are doing something right.
“We want to get back to them occasions. It’s been too long. Having had that spell of three [finals] in four years we want to be there again. Hopefully, it can be next year. We felt we had a good chance this year and it didn’t work for us, for obvious reasons, but we’ll go again next year.”
You can listen to the full interview with Manchester United and England star Michael Carrick on Drive Time from 4pm only on talkSPORT
Would most of you who think he's a fantastic player want a hard man in beside him if we're playing a 4-2-3-1?
Would most of you who think he's a fantastic player want a hard man in beside him if we're playing a 4-2-3-1?
But you do realize that is a whole bunch of 'If this an that and this and that' when playing 38 games a season there is no guaranteed bank on that... Not trying to have a go.
Wouldn't the better option be getting him free of extensive closing/challenging/marking by making his role the second part of a deeper combination of midfielders which allows him to play in the space and use his skills of interception?
When we had Hargreaves and Fletcher the balance in his game was a lot better. Some defense and some attack. Now we've seen his game really flourish in attack this season while for me his defensive side has been a bit lax.
I think it's the perfect time to get a hard man in beside him and keep that run of form going. Of course when we want to shut games out and have to have someone breaking up play there is the extra player there to either directly replace him or keep him tight while we defend.
Part of the counter attacking problem we've faced this year has been the looseness of his closing and tackling in that defensive box to circle area.
edit: When we had Harg and Fletch we also had Ronaldo which was an instant look up and hit it diagonal iWin pass.
“In the modern day game, you don't need tacklers the same way you used to,” Ferguson said. “There's no call for it. It's about anticipation and reading the game.
“The refereeing is also of such a standard now that you can hardly tackle anyone, so that sort of thing isn't the same issue as it used to be.
“Carrick can read the game and also play in front of the back four. If you look at the central midfielders in the Premier League, he can match up against any of them in terms of quality – the likes of (Luka) Modric, Yaya Toure, those are probably the best central midfielders and Gerrard.”
“I think Carrick is the key to it. He did really well in second half of last season and I think he's going to be the key man.
“Scholes and Giggs will obviously play their part and Tom Cleverley hopefully, as well as Anderson if he keeps fit. They will all play a part but for me Carrick is the key player.
“But we do have an issue in central midfield, there is no doubt about that
because getting a Scholes or a Carrick is very difficult these days.
“We have the boy Powell coming through but he is young and, although he is a very good talent, he will eventually be a midfield player.
“Carrick has always had slow starts (to a season). He denies this, he doesn't think that's true, but I do.
“By the time he gets to December he starts playing consistently well, but he had a really good end to last season, so he's the key to us.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...chael-Carrick-holds-key-to-clubs-success.html
SAF is never going to get the "hard man" you and others are after because he thinks they have no place in the modern game. The fact that he's deployed Jones in the midfield in some of our toughest games sort of contradicts what he says but I reckon SAF thinks there is no point buying someone to do that for 4-5 games when he can just use Jones there on these 'one-off' occasions.
It's not that SAF doesn't recognise we need a CM he clearly states he does its just not the type that everyone seems to think we need. He wants a Scholes who we all know is naturally offensive.
Don't need to be a specific 'hard man', but more of a skilful player who can also hold his own. The type like Fergie said: Modric, Yaya, (younger) Gerrard, and Wilshere. I thought Dembele could be the answer, but surprisingly Fergie has never shown any interest on him.
I don't know why people think Carrick-Fletcher partnership was a success. I think that's one of the most uninspiring era for our midfield when those two was in charge.