FCBarca
Mes que un Rag
If he goes to Madrid he'll take Kane with him. Did the same with Alderweireld at Saints.
This is a rumour that is picking up some momentum now in Spain
If he goes to Madrid he'll take Kane with him. Did the same with Alderweireld at Saints.
Some proper silly posts in here, Alderweireld wouldn't get in the United team, they're the same as Everton under Moyes, they should hire LVG and De Boer, feck me. Poch is doing a superb job, he's made them into a regular top 4 side with transfer and wage budgets in the relatively modest category and proven that good coaching and a plan trumps throwing expensive square pegs in round holes.
As for the 'he hasn't won anything' patter, would a league cup win suddenly make folk take notice and shout from the rooftops that Spurs have finally made it, aye. Winning a significant trophy is the next step obviously but it doesn't diminish all his good work and they're hardly on the brink of a mutiny.
Yeah but you have to win something, anything. The league cup at least. Ranieri took a Leicester side and kicked the whole "toughest" league ass, simple as. That's a good coach, Poch is decent at best IMHO sorry.
Living in fantasy land as usual. First, The world and his dog rather knew United were targeting two attacking players to replace the injured Ibrahimovic. Not one in Harry Kane.
And winning a golden boot for he second time is just that. It didnt suddenly turn him into Griezmann nor Neymar no. .....
This is a rumour that is picking up some momentum now in Spain
Fans might be excited by a brand new stadium, for managers i suspect they hate it. They won't last long enough to enjoy the fruit, they get less warchest each season.
Even wenger still bears the effect of building the emirates, imagine all the trophies he could (could) possibly win if the money isn't funneled at the new stadium.
This is a rumour that is picking up some momentum now in Spain
An inability to win things with a superior core of players and funds to Leicester and a shocking overall record vs top 6 rivals is what calls into question how good he really is.Some proper silly posts in here, Alderweireld wouldn't get in the United team, they're the same as Everton under Moyes, they should hire LVG and De Boer, feck me. Poch is doing a superb job, he's made them into a regular top 4 side with transfer and wage budgets in the relatively modest category and proven that good coaching and a plan trumps throwing expensive square pegs in round holes.
As for the 'he hasn't won anything' patter, would a league cup win suddenly make folk take notice and shout from the rooftops that Spurs have finally made it, aye. Winning a significant trophy is the next step obviously but it doesn't diminish all his good work and they're hardly on the brink of a mutiny.
He most certainly isn't. There are a number strikers in Europe who are as good or better than Kane and Griezmann is currently one of them.Griezmann for feck's sake? Kane is head and shoulders above him. ,
I most certainly do not.You seriously under-rate Kane's standing in the game -
Its has nothing to do with suiting I don't have to "accept" fanboish nonsense. Its an utter no brainer having to choose between signing Lukaku/Morata plus Griezmann to replace the injured Zlatan to signing just Kane for the type of ludicrous fee that would convince Spurs to part with him. Your kind of argument wpuld hold water if a United or City were in desperate need of a strictly a world class 9 and chase after everyone but Kane.but then I suppose that suits your argument as to why Mourinho went for Lukaku and not Kane (and your refusal to accept it was because he knew Kane was a no-go).
Pochettino will get a bigger warchest, not less. This is because (a) Spurs have "pre-loaded" much of their transfer austerity over the last several years, saving up with the new stadium in mind; and (b) the income increase from the new stadium is going to be huge for Spurs. These two factors will more than offset debt repayment requirements.
Arsenal were happy to take on debt and were prepared to pay it off, they knew it would be difficult. What they didn't plan for was the eventuality of Chelsea and Manchester City becoming financial forces and broadcasting money going through the roof. The first couple of years at the Emirates definitely took its toll on Wenger, but he has in no way damaged his legacy. Especially when you consider he effectively paid off the stadium bonds through transfers whilst getting into the Champions League -- which was a big deal at the time. Premier League money now negates the need for that.Fans might be excited by a brand new stadium, for managers i suspect they hate it. They won't last long enough to enjoy the fruit, they get less warchest each season.
Even wenger still bears the effect of building the emirates, imagine all the trophies he could (could) possibly win if the money isn't funneled at the new stadium.
He most certainly isn't. There are a number strikers in Europe who are as good or better than Kane and Griezmann is currently one of them.
I most certainly do not.
I just dont happen to think the striking position in world football rises and sets with Kane just because he is s Spurs player. You are the type who just last season was telling us your Dembele is "head and shoulders above Pogb'....
Its has nothing to do with suiting I don't have to "accept" fanboish nonsense. Its an utter no brainer having to choose between signing Lukaku/Morata plus Griezmann to replace the injured Zlatan to signing just Kane for the type of ludicrous fee that would convince Spurs to part with him. Your kind of argument wpuld hold water if a United or City were in desperate need of a strictly a world class 9 and chase after everyone but Kane.
How? It in fact leaves him without excuse. Why do you think a Wenger nowadays, for example is a figure of ridicule?Wouldn’t that also go against the argument that to be proven as a quality manager he needs to win something?
I can't be bothered responding further to someone who is clearly ignorant of the history of Spurs and whose view of Alderweireld is beyond stupid and based on very little.
As to "our place" - right now it's in the Champion's League. And for most of the seasons since Fergie retired "our place" has been above United in the league table. But perhaps you're also ignorant of that ... it wouldn't surprise me if you were.
Is this our version of Ty? Our CB's are clearly better than Alderweireld? I wouldnt even put our CB's in the top 5 at the moment, Jones is probably the best, working his way back to form and has looked good recently. Im always worried with jones due to his terrible injury record. He is a classy player and maybe could have gone on to be world class(is it too late?) but like Wilshere, hard to include him in any sort of elite list due to injury. Bailly out injured, not really on the table for discussion, Smalling is a solid player but not top 5 CB material. Lindelof and Rojo have been ok squad players but hardly elite level.
Alderweireld has been arguably the best CB in the league for the past two seasons. The only reason hes not in the discussion recently is the same reason Bailly is off the table for discussion, injury. For this season you would have to go with someone like Otamendi as a safe bet or Tarkowski who has been killing it at Burnley who are quietly sitting in 7th, five points behind Arsenal.
Poch worse than a coach sacked less than a year after winning the league? Surely a wind-up.
Griezmann, Icardi, Suarez, Lewandowski, Higuain, Dybala ...Need more?Name them.
So namely because they’ve won Something Brendan Rodgers,Martinez, DiMateo,Laudraup are all now qualified or good enough to manage the top teams?How? It in fact leaves him without excuse. Why do you think a Wenger nowadays, for example is a figure of ridicule?
Griezmann, Icardi, Suarez, Lewandowski, Higuain, Dybala ...Need more?
This really is the wrong view. Big jobs, and the biggest jobs like Madrid, don’t come around too often so when you get the opportunity you probably should jump at it. It may go spectacularly bad but the right call is taking the opportunity especially since he’ll still get another job regardless of how he does at Madrid.Going to Real now would be a mistake. He should try to win something tangible at Spurs before jumping into a role where expectations are astronomical. I get the feeling, though, that he has a somewhat inflated view of himself and would jump at the chance.
You are free to want Kane over them. The fact is a number of them are either as good or better than Kane. Yet I havent even mentioned Aubameyang, Diego Costa nor Cavani. Nor Aguero when he is at his best. Nor the two top dogs of goal letting.I'd take Kane over all of them bar Lewandowski. I don't class Dybala as a striker so it's not like for like.
Rather they have shown there is no excuse for not winning trophies at the top level if you are to be considered a top tier manager. If you are not winning things at any level, why in this day and age would a top club give you a chance? Especially after witnessing the Moyes and United mess?So namely because they’ve won Something Brendan Rodgers,Martinez, DiMateo,Laudraup are all now qualified or good enough to manage the top teams?
Madness you say? Its madness to say a player whose goals and performances have taken his nation and club to the brink of winning continental honors, whilst competing against sides with superior pedigree and talent, that got him a balon dor podium nod is better than or as good as Kane? And you expect to be taken seriously?Also no way is Griezman currently better than Kane. That’s just madness.
Ok if there were only two choices for the job at United and it was Brendan Rodgers and Pochetinho who would you go for?Rather they have shown there is no excuse for not winning trophies at the top level if you are to be considered a top tier manager. If you are not winning things at any level, why in this day and age would a top club give you a chance? Especially after witnessing the Moyes and United mess?
Frankly unless you are already a legend at a big club, sans having a winning cv I cant see them hiring you 9/10 times.
Madness you say? Its madness to say a player whose goals and performances have taken his nation and club to the brink of winning continental honors, whilst competing against sides with superior pedigree and talent, that got him a balon dor podium nod is better than Kane? And you expect to be taken seriously?
Correction, Kane is right now the more in form player.Ok if there were only two choices for the job at United and it was Brendan Rodgers and Pochetinho who would you go for?
Also have you watched Griezman this year, also no way should he have gotten 3rd in the Balon Dor and he is a long way off that form now. Right now Kane is the far superior player.
Alderweireld is better than what we have currently and is the best CB in the league.Some proper silly posts in here, Alderweireld wouldn't get in the United team, they're the same as Everton under Moyes, they should hire LVG and De Boer, feck me. Poch is doing a superb job, he's made them into a regular top 4 side with transfer and wage budgets in the relatively modest category and proven that good coaching and a plan trumps throwing expensive square pegs in round holes.
As for the 'he hasn't won anything' patter, would a league cup win suddenly make folk take notice and shout from the rooftops that Spurs have finally made it, aye. Winning a significant trophy is the next step obviously but it doesn't diminish all his good work and they're hardly on the brink of a mutiny.
So Just cop out then? One has won stuff and the other hasn’t but you’ve to choose one, which one would you go for? How about DiMateo who has a champions league trophy to his name or Poch. For the long term security of your club and the one you think would get the best results which one are you choosing?Correction, Kane is right now the more in form player.
As for Rodgers or Pochetino, Id frankly pick neither. Both have won nothing at the highest level. Yet Poch is clearly better than Rodgers.
Kane is clearly better than the bolded. You're just putting every good striker above him to prove a non-existent point.You are free to want Kane over them. The fact is a number of them are either as good or better than Kane. Yet I havent even mentioned Aubameyang, Diego Costa nor Cavani. Nor Aguero when he is at his best. Nor the two top dogs of goal letting.
Kane is fantastic. But no one should pretend he is an undisputed number one
Smalling and Rojo better than Alderweireld? FFSTy, seriously? Did i ever say our CBs are top5 in the league? I said i wouldn't have him over any of our CBs. It's my opinion and if you don't like it don't read or comment it. It's a messaging board, we're supposed to exchange opinions.
Yes worse. Ranieri won the league. With Leicester. Leicester.
What? Why does Leicester winning the league only apply to Poch? 5 other top 6 managers also lost to Leicester. Also it's intellectually dishonest to only focus on his record vs the top 6. There is no top 6 trophy that I know of and given that Spurs have the least resources out of the top 6 their record isn't surprising.An inability to win things with a superior core of players and funds to Leicester and a shocking overall record vs top 6 rivals is what calls into question how good he really is.
Cope out my foot. If you imagine Griezmann's current form is his true level as a player you are seriously deluded.So Just cop out then?
Did you see me hailing the likes of Laudrup for top jobs just because they won a mere trophy at the highest level?One has won stuff and the other hasn’t but you’ve to choose one, which one would you go for? How about DiMateo who has a champions league trophy to his name or Poch. For the long term security of your club and the one you think would get the best results which one are you choosing?
No. Griezmann > Kane to me stillAlso I’m not even sure if at his best Griezman is better than Kane, it’s probably pretty close. So you corrected yourself then?
Based in what? Stop letting fanboish sentiment cloud your judgementKane is clearly better than the bolded.
Rather I'm simply disproving your type of fanboish nonsense.You're just putting every good striker above him to prove a non-existent point.
Er what? Earlier I even stated Wenger had become a figure of ridicule after Ranieri won the league with a Leciester. For lack of resources is no longer an excuse. So how does that translate into only applying to Pochetino?What? Why does Leicester winning the league only apply to Poch?
What a joke excuse. Its the likes of you trying to ram it down our throats that Pochetino is special. If he is, his record vs top 6 rivals should be better than it is. Resources are irrelevant.Also it's intellectually dishonest to only focus on his record vs the top 6. There is no top 6 trophy that I know of and given that Spurs have the least resources out of the top 6 their record isn't surprising.
Alderweireld is better than what we have currently and is the best CB in the league.
Do you realise that City, for example, have outspent Spurs in net terms by 19 to 1 in recent years ... and that's not including wages.
Frankly it makes me laugh when some fans point to clubs with virtually unlimited spending power and hail their managers as "great" when they win some trophies. Maybe they should consider what Pochettino could do with vast sums to spend.
What? Why does Leicester winning the league only apply to Poch? 5 other top 6 managers also lost to Leicester. Also it's intellectually dishonest to only focus on his record vs the top 6. There is no top 6 trophy that I know of and given that Spurs have the least resources out of the top 6 their record isn't surprising.
I'm not Spurs fan, but some of the logic in this thread is looney tunes.
Pochettino will get a bigger warchest, not less. This is because (a) Spurs have "pre-loaded" much of their transfer austerity over the last several years, saving up with the new stadium in mind; and (b) the income increase from the new stadium is going to be huge for Spurs. These two factors will more than offset debt repayment requirements.
Arsenal were happy to take on debt and were prepared to pay it off, they knew it would be difficult. What they didn't plan for was the eventuality of Chelsea and Manchester City becoming financial forces and broadcasting money going through the roof. The first couple of years at the Emirates definitely took its toll on Wenger, but he has in no way damaged his legacy. Especially when you consider he effectively paid off the stadium bonds through transfers whilst getting into the Champions League -- which was a big deal at the time. Premier League money now negates the need for that.
So it'll be interesting to see what Spurs do in the first couple of years. What works to Pochettino's advantage is unlike Wenger he has someone to take care of the finance side of things (Levy) so he can concentrate on the first team.
Correction, Kane is right now the more in form player.
As for Rodgers or Pochetino, Id frankly pick neither. Both have won nothing at the highest level. Yet Poch is clearly better than Rodgers and if forced Id take him.
Besides, the argument isnt just about merely winning things. Or Id be making claims like Frank De Boer > Pochetino. Yet his last two jobs after winning things at an Ajax were a disaster. The main thing is getting noticed at a lower level for either disrupting the dominance of a major player in a top 5 league with a smaller team, plus making a huge impact with that size of team on a continental level at the same time. Simeone for example has been at a club of a smaller financial stature than Spurs, yet look at his record. A record like his is what should earn you a shout for any big job.
Well, I guess that's an alternative view.This really is the wrong view. Big jobs, and the biggest jobs like Madrid, don’t come around too often so when you get the opportunity you probably should jump at it. It may go spectacularly bad but the right call is taking the opportunity especially since he’ll still get another job regardless of how he does at Madrid.
Don't confuse issues here. I'm simply in disagreement with any claim that Kane > Griezmann based on this season's form. For Griezmann at his best has produced a level of performance and impact Kane is still to reach and Griez has not been close to his best this term.When does 'player in good form' turn into 'high quality player' for you? Three seasons of 'good form' clearly isn't enough? Four seasons? Five? Never?
It's true i don't follow Tottenham week in and week out, but the few games that i watched he sure ain't. And that's just my opinion. But you two with your über football judgement/knowledge are surely employed by some top clubs. If not, offer your services to Spurs, maybe you'd help them win a cup at least every decade or so.
You're also probably considering Spurs as a major player in world football, one of the biggest around, a revolution on the green fields of the Prem, with your mighty wins against Real etc.. The new stadium is bound to have a trophy room, what will it display, pictures of your "world class" players?
Sorry but Alderweireld is not all that, Poch is not all that, and your club is not all that. You're Tottenham, know your place.