Hugh Jass
Shave Dass
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2016
- Messages
- 11,500
I have serious reservations about him. Can he handle Man Utd? There is an inkling of doubt that we will hire him and then two years down the line we are looking for a new manager again.
The thing is Pochettino's qualities are obvious but his flaws seem to be as obvious. Tottenham have been a well drilled team when all the starters were fit but to me it seems that he has always struggled to integrate or adapt to new players with different characteristics. I have an LVG vibe about him where I wouldn't trust him with money, I feel that he is a manager that can thrive when he is forced to deal with what he has and new shiny players quickly become an hindrance more than an asset.
I suspect that he is the foundation type of manager and not the one to take you to the top of the food chain, I don't know if that makes sense?
The thing is Pochettino's qualities are obvious but his flaws seem to be as obvious. Tottenham have been a well drilled team when all the starters were fit but to me it seems that he has always struggled to integrate or adapt to new players with different characteristics. I have an LVG vibe about him where I wouldn't trust him with money, I feel that he is a manager that can thrive when he is forced to deal with what he has and new shiny players quickly become an hindrance more than an asset.
I suspect that he is the foundation type of manager and not the one to take you to the top of the food chain, I don't know if that makes sense?
I have serious reservations about him. Can he handle Man Utd? There is an inkling of doubt that we will hire him and then two years down the line we are looking for a new manager again.
My biggest worry is we hire him and he basically just achieves the bare minimum for a decade. A bit too good to be as bad as Moyes, Ole and co but basically converts us into the Arsenal of 2005 - present.
A big part of our fanbase would happily settle for that, as they would've finally got their long term manager. This club just doesn't sack managers until they completely shit the bed.
Agreed. Seems that we haven't got rid of the virus yetMy worry is can he command respect. The players are not disciplined in my view. They threw Mourinho under the bus and will more than likely throw ole as well. There is too much player power. They need a manager to come in and really just get into their heads like people in the army.
My worry is can he command respect. The players are not disciplined in my view. They threw Mourinho under the bus and will more than likely throw ole as well. There is too much player power. They need a manager to come in and really just get into their heads like people in the army.
Next monday is Poch day. #believe
Son Kane and Sissoko all players he integrated?
Thats a fair statement and an open question.
Not sure about adapting to players because from what we saw, the time to integrate new players and push the team on was 2018 and he got no new players for 18 months.
He didn't really have very long to work with the likes of NDombele and Los Celso (who was injured up until Poch was sacked)
This has more to do with the board not backing managers, rather than a manager not commanding respect.
I feel fairly safe in saying if Poch comes in, we'll be back looking for a new manager within two and half seasons.
Fair play to those who are happy to get excited by him, but as much as I long for a change and to see some proper tactical knowhow and style implemented on this team, its not Poch's style I crave.
The grass is always greener.
I'd expect to be reading the same complaints on here a few months into his reign. People will want the next flavour of the month in.
From what you read about him, training would be more intense and they'll get less days off. There's only one way that will go with our overpaid prima donnas at the first sign of a bad result.
As long as you have someone in Florida taking footballing decisions, it won't work. The only successes United had under the Glazer was when they didn't mess with footballing decisions, when Fergie was still around.I feel fairly safe in saying if Poch comes in, we'll be back looking for a new manager within two and half seasons.
Fair play to those who are happy to get excited by him, but as much as I long for a change and to see some proper tactical knowhow and style implemented on this team, its not Poch's style I crave.
If we were to indulge in a post Ole shortlist, would Poch be at the top of your list despite the flaws you've perceived here? I can only see Tuchel as a likely "other" who may be out of work during this season.
Next monday is Poch day. #believe
I was the same. I've long learnt the lesson that there isn't one man that will come in and solve everything, especially if it means just getting in the one guy that just happens to be available rather than any kind of long term plan.This thread reminds me a lot of Redcafe's love in with Jose before he was made our manager. He was seen as the worthy manager who will surely bring success here (including me).
Yeah good luck to any manager coming in trying to move our unwanted players on.He has to get of some toxic players at the club straight away. Lingard and Pogba for starters.
None of that support your claim, I specifically said that none of them are good at short passing game and they aren't which is why the likes of Pogba, Fred and Matic drop deep and are the ones actually starting our transitions. None of them are good in a high defensive line and we get destroyed when opponents play a more direct style and none of the starting fullbacks are close to be playing like out and out wingers, they are both defensive fullbacks. It doesn't matter whether you believe that Ole is a good tactical coach, the conversation was about whether the squad is specialized or not and whether the next manager should follow Ole's style, none of the things you described in your previous post fit with the players that we have.
Also The mention of Shaw and big games highlights it, in the league he played 3 times as a CB last season, against City, Liverpool and Chelsea, you really think that he is a potential out and out winger?
So to go back to my point, Ole hasn't imposed a clear style, we still have a squad made of players that can do a bit of everything but excels at nothing, so there isn't really a strong argument behind the idea the we should hire a manager that has the same style than Ole.
I’ll bow out as I basically want to make the same point as @JPRouve it he’s more eloquent than me.He is an upgrade on Ole for a number of obvious reasons. Does that mean he is the right man no! But is he better than Ole? Their respective track records clearly says yes.
Ole beat him once and so? Bit weird to pick one game and say that. Didn't he do Ole at Old Trafford? Single games mean nothing. Also as others have pointed out Spurs absolutely dominated us second half so its not really true to say Ole won the tactical battle in that game
Refusal to change tactics? Do you think he played the same tactics over at Spurs for 5 years? Maybe you should do your homework first because you are clearly mistaken.
Shit signings? How many shit signings did he make at Spurs? Go on? His success vs others managers in the top6 clubs in spending and signings in the same period? Willing to bet he comes out looking good on that with
Dier, Sissoko, Alli, Son, Aldervereild etc. Thats not even really taking into account that transfers and signings were the main reasons he had issues with the Spurs board.
A few misses like Davinson Sanchez and Vincent Jansen but which teams in the same period don’t have a few of those?
Tuchel TuesdayMauricio Monday
Spurs brought a lot more than 3 players but Kane and the striking position illustrates my point, none of Soldado, Llorente or Janssen were remotely good for him or looked like they fit into the team's gameplan. Sissoko didn't fit and was a flop until 2018 when Pochettino was forced to do without Dembélé. And Son is arguably Tottenham's best signing in the last decade, he is the exception not the norm.
To me it's quite obvious, he is good tactically and a good coach but he also seems stubborn unless pushed into a corner.
I think a lot of this is the main issue.
Pochettino was a 'trendsetter' with Southampton and early spurs by rinsing a high level of fitness out of his teams, pressing high etc. Pep came over and had his version, everyone evolved to the fashion and slowly Poch's style was watered down by everyone else's implementation.
He didn't evolve it in any way over the 5 and a bit seasons, and very, very rarely had an effective 'Plan B' that was anything but a car crash. Wouldn't make a sub before the 80th minute unless he had to either. What this meant was that the high intensity just wrecked the players and the team's lifespan suffered.
He'd be great if you wanted to finish 2nd or 3rd consistently, but we never had the stamina for a full season - that's why Liverpool and Leicester won titles ahead of us, because we'd be great for the first 85% of the season, then tire and fall away for the rest.
Tuchel Tuesday
Wenger Wednesday
Tony Pulis Thursday
Flick s Friday
Simeone Saturday
Southgate Sunday
(Sorry about Thursday guys
I see, now that makes sense.
But is it actually that bad? Top 6 teams aren't supposed to lose at home and they rarely do, if I'm not mistaken 3 home loses has been the maximum between 2014 and 2019. I would argue that for that particular metric, a loss rate is more pertinent and it would be an interesting way to compare top teams in away games against each others.
Edit: My point isn't linked to Pochettino.
Club | Games* | W | D | L | CS | GF | GA | GD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arsenal | 32 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 40 | 69 | -29 |
Tottenham | 35 | 4 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 41 | 69 | -28 |
Chelsea | 34 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 4 | 29 | 57 | -28 |
Liverpool | 31 | 9 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 41 | 48 | -7 |
United | 31 | 10 | 6 | 15 | 8 | 26 | 41 | -15 |
City | 37 | 12 | 8 | 17 | 12 | 44 | 54 | -10 |
Club | Win % | Draw % | Loss % |
---|---|---|---|
Arsenal | 9% | 38% | 53% |
Tottenham | 11% | 26% | 63% |
Chelsea | 15% | 38% | 47% |
Liverpool | 29% | 39% | 32% |
United | 32% | 19% | 48% |
City | 32% | 22% | 46% |
I’ll bow out as I basically want to make the same point as @JPRouve it he’s more eloquent than me.
In five years You named five players and an etc. I don’t think that he done well buying players, if he had more money that doesn’t mean he all of a sudden would.
I’d end by agreeing that he’s a better coach than Ole, not enough to make a difference here so a pointless change and would prefer someone else.
I was the same. I've long learnt the lesson that there isn't one man that will come in and solve everything, especially if it means just getting in the one guy that just happens to be available rather than any kind of long term plan.
You got baited mate.I have seen some shit posting and shit posters over the last decade on the Caf. But you take the cake. Cultists like you are what is ailing the fanbase at the moment. Hope you can someday get rid of your blind hatred, irrespective of whether Pochettino or any other top coach manages us. But for now keep supporting your idol like the cultist you are. See if that saves his bacon. Find a thread where you can brown-nose him properly. And maybe feck off with him when United do get a new manager. Lunatic. Ignored.
Rinse and repeat...does anyone really expect it the turn out any different.
It’s amazing the Glazers still have faith in anything Woody recommends.
You raised a valid point, so I checked it out for you, see below:
Club Games* W D L CS GF GA GD Arsenal 32 3 12 17 3 40 69 -29 Tottenham 35 4 9 22 2 41 69 -28 Chelsea 34 5 13 16 4 29 57 -28 Liverpool 31 9 12 10 5 41 48 -7 United 31 10 6 15 8 26 41 -15 City 37 12 8 17 12 44 54 -10
*Top 6 away games all comps during Pochettinos time at Tottenham
Club Win % Draw % Loss % Arsenal 9% 38% 53% Tottenham 11% 26% 63% Chelsea 15% 38% 47% Liverpool 29% 39% 32% United 32% 19% 48% City 32% 22% 46%
Now, you have to bare in mind that Tottenham at this point was fairly stable while others around them were in various states of rebuild. You would hope or assume that Pochettino would have been able to take advantage of that and be able to win more games. Alas, he can't. In the games that truly matter, he can't do it. It's why I think the top clubs are avoiding him in my opinion. Let's be fair, United have been largely abysmal during Pochettinos reign and we ended up with a far better record than he managed in the tough games. That should be a big red alarm right? Ultimately I guess it depends on what we want for our next United Manager, another man to come in and attempt a rebuild or a man to come in and take us back up to the top. If we want the later, Pochettino imo isn't that man.
Yes true...got completely baited after a tough day at work. Generally can tell the WUM posters but failed utterly this time around.You got baited mate.
Posters who try to WUM like that aren't worth a serious reply, much less a meltdown.
The thing is Pochettino's qualities are obvious but his flaws seem to be as obvious. Tottenham have been a well drilled team when all the starters were fit but to me it seems that he has always struggled to integrate or adapt to new players with different characteristics. I have an LVG vibe about him where I wouldn't trust him with money, I feel that he is a manager that can thrive when he is forced to deal with what he has and new shiny players quickly become an hindrance more than an asset.
I suspect that he is the foundation type of manager and not the one to take you to the top of the food chain, I don't know if that makes sense?