Asger
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2010
- Messages
- 3,794
You're joking
No I don’t overrate our players. None of them have proved they are good enough for a top title winning team except Matic and De Gea.
You're joking
You said 5th position not 1stNo I don’t overrate our players. None of them have proved they are good enough for a top title winning team except Matic and De Gea.
Then Poch can’t succeed at a big club.Then such players need to be shown the door - which Poch would do double-quick-time. He has no time for prima donnas doing the whole '"look at me, I'm at a big club and therefore you need to impress me" routine.
On the contrary, he would say words to the effect of: "YOU need to impress me or you'll be out. The era of social media cult-building and big-time charlies is over at this club. I don't give a feck how much you earn or how good you think you are. You're only good enough for this club if I say you are... and until now you've been an under-performing, half-arsed, disjointed rabble. You will sweat blood. You will crawl into bed too knackered for your gaming consoles. From now on you will earn your wages. Get with the programme or be shipped out."
I still feel Poch needs to have experience winning a few major leagues elsewhere before he can come to United.
Our expectations here are too big for his CV, and he won't get the support he thinks he will get.
I mean if Pogba himself makes it clear he wants to leave I don`t think the board will mind siding with the manager and it looks like Pogba`s head is elsewhereThen Poch can’t succeed at a big club.
Let’s ignore United for a moment and go to a different league. There’s a chance he could get the PSG job at some stage. Now who will the board choose if it’s a choice between their star player(s) and Poch? If Poch is unwilling to get the balance right between sticking to his principles and system and making compromises in favour of some star players then he can forget big clubs. Clubs will make huge losses if they keep selling record signings everything a manager asks for it.
This approach will not fly with Ed and the board and their ideas of investment players. He will not have the kind of power he had at Spurs where he shipped out the team captain and sold him, along with a lot of other players he deemed were not performing. Adebayor was your star player and relegated to training with the reserves under Pochettino, that would not fly here, I certainly do not see Ed condoning his 90mil investment being sent to play with the reserves if Pochettino did not like Pogba's attitude and application.
Good to see some realistic expectations on here...
Definitely, you need to get rid off some players. I was rather referring to Poch talking the way the Spurs fan described to Neymar, Mbappe or Sancho (if we buy him), etc.I mean if Pogba himself makes it clear he wants to leave I don`t think the board will mind siding with the manager and it looks like Pogba`s head is elsewhere
If Poch picks a fight with Ed over transfers there's only going to be one winner there. We've seen that happen before...
Yes, whoever we hire should have the correct vision. Unfortunately it's a critical hire for us, so obviously Woodward won't do it.
That won't happen .... because Poch would IMO only sign up in he first place if it's agreed in advance that he has control over transfers (within a net spend budget as agreed by the United board). He isn't going to be trapped in a game of responsibility without power.
Then Poch can’t succeed at a big club.
Let’s ignore United for a moment and go to a different league. There’s a chance he could get the PSG job at some stage. Now who will the board choose if it’s a choice between their star player(s) and Poch? If Poch is unwilling to get the balance right between sticking to his principles and system and making compromises in favour of some star players then he can forget big clubs. Clubs will make huge losses if they keep selling record signings everything a manager asks for it.
He has some hits, some flops. Levy does good business for him too.I am forgetful but was Poch the one who bought Son to Spurs? His signings have been particularly good, isnt it? A few duds like Llorente though
Incredible under playing of what he actually achieved there I must say. Turning a bottom top 6 team into a top 4/3 team is incredibly difficult especially when you consider the spending power you are up against. He also got the team to a Champions League final, let's not forget that. I hope he doesn't go to Utd because then I would start to fear Utd again.
Allegri just thrown in for kicks? Spot the odd one out. I’m not surprised if the club worked like that.In any case you will have to start fearing for United. We are not signing one more Ole again. The next coach will be actually a good one who will have good base to work with. I can guarantee one of the below would be our manager before Xmas and each one of them would be serious improvement on what we have now
Poch
Allegri
Rose
In any case you will have to start fearing for United. We are not signing one more Ole again. The next coach will be actually a good one who will have good base to work with. I can guarantee one of the below would be our manager before Xmas and each one of them would be serious improvement on what we have now
Poch
Allegri
Rose
Allegri just thrown in for kicks? Spot the odd one out. I’m not surprised if the club worked like that.
Would love. But he is not coming mid-seaaon unless we have confirmation he is joining us end of seasonDefinitely or Nagelsman
I'd be happy with that. Just praying that we're not in the bottom half by thenWould love. But he is not coming mid-seaaon unless we have confirmation he is joining us end of season
Which would be in line with our idiotic leadership. My point is Poch, Rose etc are considered modern exciting coaches, Allegri quite the opposite. I hope it won’t be Allegri. All the other candidates mentioned I’d be thrilled about.He is free and is available to take over immediately. He would be definitely considered.
He is free and is available to take over immediately. He would be definitely considered.
Which would be in line with our idiotic leadership. My point is Poch, Rose etc are considered modern exciting coaches, Allegri quite the opposite. I hope it won’t be Allegri. All the other candidates mentioned I’d be thrilled about.
Allegri would feel like a lurch back (stylistically) to Mourinho. I too would like someone a bit more forward thinking, but, unlike Ole, also with the nous to bring those ideas to fruition.
Replace Matic with Fred and Scot , you can play high press. Maguire would be a problem but with right partner we can get around that issue.To be honest, although I dislike Allegri's football it suits the current squad more than Pochettino's. Do we really think our defensive and midfield options can play the pressing game that Poch loves? With the full backs high up, leaving the centre backs in continued one v one duels?
This squad is tooled to play reactive, defensive football and it will continue to be so unless a massive recycling of playing personnel takes place. Is that Man Utd board willing to sanction that? The Man Utd board isn't even willing to let Rojo and Romero leave.
Looking at our squad it makes more sense to appoint Allegri than Poch, unless the Board is going to sell half the squad and bring in energetic, athletic players to replace them.
The foundation of success for any ambitious club is a strong unifying vision of the kind of football they want to play, that is tactically progressive given how the game is developing more broadly, and which can inform decisions not just about first team management, but also recruitment, and how players are trained in the academy.
The ideal situation is to have this unifying vision come down from board level but that's not an option for United. So the club really needs a manager with this kind of vision, a tactically progressive younger manager who has a strong sense of the football he wants to play and the qualities needed at each position to play this kind of football.
United has appointed four different managers post SAF without even trying to find someone that fits this profile. The club needs to start trying. Poch may or may not be the answer but at least I can imagine a plausible scenario in which he is the answer. I don't think that is true of Ole. It has never been clear to me what kind of football he wants to play and the qualities of the players he has recruited don't make sense as parts of a cohesive whole. He has just bought a bunch of young talented players who want to come to Manchester United, without any sense of how the jigsaw will fit together and what the final picture on the box looks like. That may be an improvement on past transfer decisions but it is not an approach that will actually lift the club back to the top.
Replace Matic with Fred and Scot , you can play high press. Maguire would be a problem but with right partner we can get around that issue.
How do you know the players we have ended up with are the players he wanted?
Successive coaches at Man Utd have complained about the way recruitment works and the fact they did not actually end up with the targets they wanted. I have not seen anything to suggest Ole was in for Cavani all summer long.
Being a coach of a football team does not give you complete and utter autonomy to do as you want.
The truth is, even if Pochettino comes in, he will be expected to work within the confines the club sets for him.
The club is not looking to get rid of Ole because it wants a change of philosophy. The briefings over the past week have been clear: The club is not happy with the results we are seeing from this squad and its considering a change of coach to improve the performances of this squad. All this talk of building and philosophy is a million miles away from what the decision makers are thinking.
Any coach who comes in will be expected to work with the players we have, first and foremost. If they can't succeed they'll be fired. Whether the transfer committee wanted the players, whether Joel Glazer thinks X player is the new Pele, whether Woodward has liked Cavani since 2013. If they cannot work with that then they will go.
This is wildly optimistic. Fred and McTominay have never succeeded in a high press at United. They have only done well in games where we've set up to counter and used their energy to disrupt the passing lines in our middle third. The first half of last season is a case study of what happens when you ask Fred and McTominay to play on the front foot and it doesn't look pretty.
Even your most basic coach will target Maguire with balls in behind the full back. His lack of pace mean the full backs cannot advance as much as they otherwise would, there's too much risk involved leaving the channel open even if you have a quick player next to him. Maguire's looked his best in games where our full backs have been at their least adventurous. If you try to switch it up too much he gets exposed.
@Daysleeper
Is Luis Enrique a good manager? After what he did at Barcelona I was wondering why he didnt get much of a chance at another club.
Was his success due to the players he had merited before him or was his management important to your success?
An oft repeated truism defines madness as doing the same thing time after time whilst expecting a different result.
Since Fergie, you have sacked 3 managers. Why do you think sacking a fourth will make any difference? Might the real problem be a lack of a coherent board strategy since 2013?
Just saying...
How do you know the players we have ended up with are the players he wanted?
Successive coaches at Man Utd have complained about the way recruitment works and the fact they did not actually end up with the targets they wanted. I have not seen anything to suggest Ole was in for Cavani all summer long.
Being a coach of a football team does not give you complete and utter autonomy to do as you want.
The truth is, even if Pochettino comes in, he will be expected to work within the confines the club sets for him.
The club is not looking to get rid of Ole because it wants a change of philosophy. The briefings over the past week have been clear: The club is not happy with the results we are seeing from this squad and its considering a change of coach to improve the performances of this squad. All this talk of building and philosophy is a million miles away from what the decision makers are thinking.
Any coach who comes in will be expected to work with the players we have, first and foremost. If they can't succeed they'll be fired. Whether the transfer committee wanted the players, whether Joel Glazer thinks X player is the new Pele, whether Woodward has liked Cavani since 2013. If they cannot work with that then they will go.
I'm thinking mainly about the summer of 2019 and the transfers of Maguire and Wan-Bissaka. I could be wrong but my understanding is that those were players Ole wanted. They are both players with some very good characteristics. But I have never understood how their specific characteristics actually mesh with the kind of football that Ole wants to play or why he would would recruit those specific players. My suspicion is that his transfer strategy doesn't go much beyond finding expensive players that are good, young, and want to play for United. And that's really not good enough. There a million good young players, most of whom would want to play for United. Its picking among those players that counts and you need a strong footballing vision that encompasses the characteristics each player must have in each position in order to do that well.
That is very true and I think the main blockage to Poch ever becoming Utd manager - if he doesn't feel he can work in the way he wants and be backed fully by the board then he won't take the job.
None of this has anything to do with the original point. In every big club there will be “star players or talent” who will be there before and after the manager. Yes the club will get rid off some, but there will be others who the board of any big club will insist on being kept and integrated. If the manager refuses to do so he has to go unless it is a manager who has already had huge success with the club, then the board might decide to stick with the opinion of the manager.Clubs make big losses from shelling out huge sums and huge wages for "big name" players who then don't deliver - and then they can't sell them except for a big loss because no-one else is able or willing to match their wages.
United will continue to be stuck in their malaise for as long as they stick with the "prestige" idea that they need to be signing "big names" on big wages. Your pursuit of Sancho is just more of the same old same old.
And by the way, your notion of big clubs appears to be outdated. Poch was at Spurs, a club that arguably has the finest stadium and training centre in the world... and now has the 8th highest income in global football. He won't be impressed with club sensibilities that are stuck in the past.
What is this understanding based on?
The club briefed that it had looked at 900 right backs and settled on Wan Bissaka. Nothing about the briefing suggested Ole played a major role in identifying Wan-Bissaka.
On Maguire, he was a club target before Ole even arrived. We know this because Mourinho spoke about him as an option when he was a sky pundit. In fact many United players have ended up signing long after they were first linked to the club e.g. Luke Shaw, Ander Herrera etc. Cavani is the most recent example of this.
Why do you assume that Ole is the one identifying the players we sign? The club has repeatedly briefed that there is a transfer committee that, yes, he inputs into. However, he does not have the lead voice. This is just a known reality.
You are acting as being a coach in real life is the same as on a computer game. In reality Ole does not have nearly that level of autonomy or decision making power. No Man Utd coach does and most of them only start bringing that to light once their NDAs expire.
Maguire and Awb were both Ole's targets and you don't need Ole to come out and tell you this because it's pretty obvious if you've been following up. Ole has also said he has the final say on transfers which pretty much confirms he has the most significant role in picking a player Why would the club even decide to blow 80m on a player they didn't want to spend 60m on beforeWhat is this understanding based on?
The club briefed that it had looked at 900 right backs and settled on Wan Bissaka. Nothing about the briefing suggested Ole played a major role in identifying Wan-Bissaka.
On Maguire, he was a club target before Ole even arrived. We know this because Mourinho spoke about him as an option when he was a sky pundit. In fact many United players have ended up signing long after they were first linked to the club e.g. Luke Shaw, Ander Herrera etc. Cavani is the most recent example of this.
Why do you assume that Ole is the one identifying the players we sign? The club has repeatedly briefed that there is a transfer committee that, yes, he inputs into. However, he does not have the lead voice. This is just a known reality.
You are acting as being a coach in real life is the same as on a computer game. In reality Ole does not have nearly that level of autonomy or decision making power. No Man Utd coach does and most of them only start bringing that to light once their NDAs expire.
He'll take the job if offered because he's been out of work for longer than he probably expected.