littleman
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2015
- Messages
- 837
Which is completely warranted. My takes have high accuracy rate of being spot on.
Get over yourself kid. Don't try and find internet glory when you're a real life loser.
Which is completely warranted. My takes have high accuracy rate of being spot on.
Thanks for your reply, and I know many rate him, I just wished the criticism or the praise wouldn't be this over the top, but I guess it's a forum where people enjoy having strong opinions with a preconceived narrative with little nuance. I'm sure we all do to some extent, but I don't even know how to engage with or respond to 90% of posts in here.
What you say about investment is very true imo, and he might leave or he might get more money from Spurs if he stays and then he should be judged accordingly. However, the club is investing in the club although not in the first team (infrastructure and stadium) and all our money is going there right now. I would love it if our owner would spit in some of his own money to invest in the team, but since he isn't doing it I can understand the decision of under-investment in the squad although it hurts as a fan.
We tried to beat you in the FA cup semifinal last season, but lost. I don't know how you can criticize Poch this much over not prioritizing cups when he has been in 3 semi finals and one final for 5 seasons in charge, my biggest concern for him is some of his big game management, but like you say; this semifinal against Chelsea I can't really blame him for. This season we beat Watford, West Ham and Arsenal before we lost to Chelsea on penalties without 4 of our top scorers. I'm sure if we beat Chelsea and lost to City the narrative would be that Poch doesn't care for cups or bottled it again.
Indeed. If Pochettino spent the money Guardiola spent over 5 years without a trophy I would say he failed and want him sacked. This is the difference.
So I guess the criticism he gets is:
- He is just another David Moyes.
Can do well on a small budget, but nothing more.
- He is a bottler with a weak mentality/He is a loser
His team lose any match they are expected to win.
- He hates cups/wrong priority
He doesn't prioritize the cups, which should be a springboard to win more.
- He is not that impressive, all other teams are just in transition.
Pochettino's Spurs are performing as a 6th placed team, but gets 2nd/3rd because teams that should be above are just under performing.
Did I miss something?
So I guess the criticism he gets is:
- He is just another David Moyes.
Can do well on a small budget, but nothing more.
- He is a bottler with a weak mentality/He is a loser
His team lose any match they are expected to win.
- He hates cups/wrong priority
He doesn't prioritize the cups, which should be a springboard to win more.
- He is not that impressive, all other teams are just in transition.
Pochettino's Spurs are performing as a 6th placed team, but gets 2nd/3rd because teams that should be above are just under performing.
Did I miss something?
Yes City have a strong bench, it was wrong of me to quote themIf City had say Aguero, Sterling and De Bruyne out it would just mean it would be Jesus, Mahrez and Bernardo Silva out there. That is the key difference for a side like City compared to say Spurs. That is why they are probably going to win the league cup, still have a chance at the FA Cup and are still in the title race. They have a side strong enough that their rotated sides can still blow most sides away. Spurs do not.
His awful away record against top sides.
I did think ‘I wonder how the players feel about not competing for trophies’ when I saw his quote. Baffles me why you would go there and not compete every season. Guess when Kane retires he’ll look back fondly on all those 4th place winners medals he has.His most recent interview is amazing, he might as well just be saying we just want to be the new Arsenal.
Hardly motivational to constantly tell your team that you're not able to compete and not to bother trying to win. It's even more ridiculous when he's got the best striker in the world and 3 or 4 other top talents.
I don't buy that they couldn't bring in a few squad players. Plenty of their purchases have not been cheap. It's very convenient for Poch not to strengthen and maintain this excuse.
I meant career wise
Can you give me any stats of this being true?
edit: our away record is probably quite bad, I was thinking just head to head top 6 mini table. I still wonder how it would compare to other teams.
I did think ‘I wonder how the players feel about not competing for trophies’ when I saw his quote. Baffles me why you would go there and not compete every season. Guess when Kane retires he’ll look back fondly on all those 4th place winners medals he has.
Spurs reached top 4 twice in four years before Pochettino arrived there. And that was with a strong United, which pretty much meant that there were only 3 spots for team 4. I am not even sure that Poch did that much. Him and Spurs were juts lucky that some of the other top clubs were in mess at the time when Harry Kane came at age.Arsenal are a traditional top 4 club, they’re expected to be there. Prior to the last few years, Spurs have never been expected to be there. At the time unless I’m mistaken Arsenal’s expenditure and wage bill was in line with a top 4 club, so Wenger wasn’t exactly overachieving, even if his squads were filled with a load of dross. He was mocked because of how exceptional he was in the early parts of his career relative to the shadow of his former self that he became later on.
It’s also worth mentioning that while many jokes were made about Wenger, he was still the second best manager in England over the past twenty years, and with the right setup now he could still be a very good manager, even if he waned from his initial period. I wouldn’t be in a rush to say that Poch is better than him.
There's no doubt the the club's management agree with him. But don't insult the fans in the process. Tottenham fans want to win something.What he said is 100% right.
Getting top 4 and CL money is more important for the long term health of the club than the FA cup.
Why can't a manager be evaluated in both? Do well in the league while winning a couple of smaller trophies. That would be a sign of a great manager.I think for a fan a cup win is arguably more valuable and memorable, but insofar as evaluating a manager goes it's arguably not the best criteria when it comes to judging them. Plenty of managers who performed poorly in the league have managed to win cups in recent years.
Lower salaries than other big teams, club and manager openly showing lack of ambition. Why would you stay?It's probably why Eriksen isn't looking to sign a new deal. He knows what's going on.
You're one of the main players, soon get to play in a brand new stadium, and he's living in London which is probably a big factor.Lower salaries than other big teams, club and manager openly showing lack of ambition. Why would you stay?
Simeone actually won the league too, ahead of the mighty Barca and Real. And unlike Spurs who go in UCL to make the numbers, Atletico were 1 minute away from winning it (and one penalty a couple of years later). Plus he has won Europa too.Simeone is a good measuring stick. He keep losing his best players year after year(apart from Griezmann and Godin). Keeps bringing new ones and still is always up there for the league and CL.
Actually won something - defying all odds and beat Real for his CdR none the less.
He's working with a fraction of Barca's and Real's budgets and is competing against the two best clubs in the world at the moment.
Poch has done a great job for Spurs, but is way below his level for example if we're talking about winning stuff under budget.
Liverpool went from finishing 20+ points behind City to challenging in one summer. Football can move a lot in a short space of time. I do agree if Real, Barca or Juve come in, we are unlikely to be considered. However, I believe we can compete for tittles soon, if we get our act together and signing players like Eriksen would be a sign.You're one of the main players, soon get to play in a brand new stadium, and he's living in London which is probably a big factor.
Just trying to find counter-arguments though, because in principle I agree - he'd walk into pretty much every team in the world at this stage and now at 26, soon to be 27, he should make the step up if he wants it. And not trying to be a WUM but he should aim for a team like Real or Barca, possibly Juventus or Bayern, if he wants to win things imo, not United who could or could not be a work in progress for the next few years.
Twice in fact!Simeone actually won the league too, ahead of the mighty Barca and Real. And unlike Spurs who go in UCL to make the numbers, Atletico were 1 minute away from winning it (and one penalty a couple of years later). Plus he has won Europa too.
He has won more than Poch will ever win.
Your away record vs United(W - D - L) since Poch took over:
1 - 0 - 5
vs City
1 - 1 - 2
vs Liverpool
0 - 2 - 3
vs Chelsea
1 - 1 - 5
vs Arsenal
1 - 3 - 2
Total (all competitions)
4 - 7 - 17
he actually bettered in the course of last year. Had only 1 win in 18 games away.
At home I think is pretty good all things considered.
Yes of course things can change quickly and I certainly won't rule out the possibility that you're going to challenge next season, but if I were Eriksen, I'd rather choose a "safe" option like Bayern, Barca or Juventus instead of a question mark like United if trophies is really what he's after.Liverpool went from finishing 20+ points behind City to challenging in one summer. Football can move a lot in a short space of time. I do agree if Real, Barca or Juve come in, we are unlikely to be considered. However, I believe we can compete for tittles soon, if we get our act together and signing players like Eriksen would be a sign.
I would say so. Mourinho at United had his worst away record I think in years and many journos took a shot at him with headlines - is he on decline?Thanks.
But is this significantly worse than other teams in the big 6? I'm not sure this is unique for Spurs, but if it is then yes that's something he needs to get right, although the overall quality of the team is also important.
Liverpool went from finishing 20+ points behind City to challenging in one summer. Football can move a lot in a short space of time. I do agree if Real, Barca or Juve come in, we are unlikely to be considered. However, I believe we can compete for tittles soon, if we get our act together and signing players like Eriksen would be a sign.
Can see you've at least tried to offer a counter argument but that's the equivalent of your work place getting a new office and them thinking you're important to them. Sure as shit someone else will think the same thing and pay you more too. Eriksen could play anywhere, ultimately he'll go where he's paid best and has the best chance of winning silverware. United all depends on how settled he is in England but he'd be daft to turn down a move to Barcelona if they came in.You're one of the main players, soon get to play in a brand new stadium, and he's living in London which is probably a big factor.
Just trying to find counter-arguments though, because in principle I agree - he'd walk into pretty much every team in the world at this stage and now at 26, soon to be 27, he should make the step up if he wants it. And not trying to be a WUM but he should aim for a team like Real or Barca, possibly Juventus or Bayern, if he wants to win things imo, not United who could or could not be a work in progress for the next few years.
Levy wouldn't sell you a cold.
These kind of statements are just silly. Spurs fans made same kind of posts when Walker was still at Spurs, saying how Levy won't sell key players to league rivals and then sold Walker to City, City at that time finished below Spurs.
Look, he has a year left on his contract. If Eriksen prices himself out of a move to other clubs, Levy will deal with us rather than lose £70m.Levy wouldn't sell you a cold.
Not sure for others but since you go Pochettino, we have defeated City away twice, Liverpool away twice, Arsenal away twice, Spurs away once, while also having a few draws. This takes considerations only the league matches (we have defeated Arsenal away in the cup, City away in Carling cup, and well you in Wembley last season). Bear in mind, we were supposed to be shit during those years.Thanks.
But is this significantly worse than other teams in the big 6? I'm not sure this is unique for Spurs, but if it is then yes that's something he needs to get right, although the overall quality of the team is also important.
Finish Top 4 just to be elimated from CL again?
Everyone knows you're not winning CL or PL or theres little expectation for it until you buy players so why should you be turning your noses up at domestic trophy? It's been catalyst for so many teams to go on and win bigger things - look at the way City was celebrating carabao cup last season for example. The injuries is irrevlant almost since your manager doesn't value any trophies if we read his quotes. It's likely he would've fielded weak teams even without the injuries.
Yes but he charged them 50 odd million for a right back they could immediately replace with Trippier, just imagine what he'd ask for Eriksen who'd be irreplaceable for them, and definitely a step back for them in general. The only thing making this plausible is that he's going into the last year of his contract and he doesn't seem to be in a hurry to extend.These kind of statements are just silly. Spurs fans made same kind of posts when Walker was still at Spurs, saying how Levy won't sell key players to league rivals and then sold Walker to City, City at that time finished below Spurs.
Eriksen is great, but we have a superior player who plays in that position. Not sure how balanced a midfield of him and Pogba would be. I guess that for it to work, they would need to have a Kante/Gattuso on their peak who ran 15km per game.Look, he has a year left on his contract. If Eriksen prices himself out of a move to other clubs, Levy will deal with us rather than lose £70m.
Unfortunately, I think Eriksen will have loads of other clubs wanting his signature so Levy won't have to sell to us.
Look, he has a year left on his contract. If Eriksen prices himself out of a move to other clubs, Levy will deal with us rather than lose £70m.
Unfortunately, I think Eriksen will have loads of other clubs wanting his signature so Levy won't have to sell to us.
I knew we'd sell Walker to City.
Levy doesn't like United. He doesn't like how you did business with Berbatov and will avoid selling to you at all costs.
Maybe if there was no other alternative.
I knew we'd sell Walker to City.
Levy doesn't like United. He doesn't like how you did business with Berbatov and will avoid selling to you at all costs.
Maybe if there was no other alternative.