Yes very impressed by how spurs turned up in the second half Let's be honest, they should've at least got a point and most likely won.
I'm not judging Ole by trophies. My point is that in a span of six months, he will have to do something of that scale to convince me otherwise given he has no experience at the top level. The thing with solksjaer is that he is going to be here for a short duration and it's not wise to take a decision basis that. Pochettino has played attractive football while promoting youth consistently for a few years now. He did that at Southampton and he's done it here. With all due respect to spurs, united will give him a larger budget.
He has shown consistency in one of the toughest leagues in the world, performing better than teams with bigger budgets than him. The team they put out today would've been at half the cost of ours especially if we add the bench.
I'm not too concerned about the fact that he hasn't won a trophy. Realistically it would've been a miracle had he won a PL or CL.
If he wins one of the two smaller cups does that change your opinion of him? Is one FA or carling cup the only thing stopping him from being out manager?
Roberto di Matteo has won a CL. Is he better than pochettino? Zidane won three CL in a row but was poor in the league. Would you go for him?
For me, I'd want a manager who has shown consistency in competing in the league (preferably familiar with the epl), plays a good style, promotes youth and respects the club. Pochettino does all of this. Give him the financial backing and he will have the side competing. Don't forget what this spurs side did to qualify from their group stages this season... Very disrespectful to call it long term choking
We were playing away to good side, they were always going to put us under pressure at some point in the game, very very rarely do you actually get a complete game away to a top team, we dealt with it and came away with a very good result. But they didn't get anything from the game and yet again, Pochettino and Spurs have lost when they really needed to get something out of it.
Ole has a 6 month job interview, which puts him in a unique place 'try before you buy'. Pochettino or someone else would be coming in cold and we wouldn't know what we'd be getting, just because someone has done well somewhere before, doesn't mean they will do well elsewhere, same logic as, just because Solskjaer did badly at Cardiff, doesn't mean he'll do badly at United. All clubs have different environment's and cultures. Every manager that has ever won something also had no experience at a top level once upon a time so your point is irrelevant. If they have the ability to manage at the top level they ultimately do, Solskjaer wouldn't have been offered the job on an interim basis if the club thought we'd be fighting relegation come May.
I disagree. If you've got a manager that supports the ethos, plays attacking football, wins games and wins trophies, you don't swap him out for another manager because someone else looks better on paper or might do what the manager you currently have does, it's just bizarre logic.
Pochettino has been at clubs where the club has dictated what he spends and what players he has available. I agree, he has done will with the resources afforded to him but he's also been lucky. He's had one of the best sides Southampton have ever had, and that was down to their 'black box room' apparently and now he's at Spurs where Harry Kane was given a chance by Tim Sherwood and the rest is history. Levy wouldn't have gone out and bought the best striker in England to support the Spurs cause. Levy dictates who the club sign and how much they spend. I would argue that Pochettino hasn't actual bought anyone and youth players have been played because he has to play them. If you need a right back and your chairman says 'check the reserves' then that's what you do.
Well I'm incredibly concerned he hasn't won anything. Managers like Mourinho and Fergie were winning trophies with unfashionable teams way before they made waves at bigger clubs. Pochettino can't even pick up a second rate cup and has only made one final in 4 years. If he wins anything it will change my opinion, I just don't think he will. For me, Spurs always seem to choke when they absolutely have to win, that may not be completely his fault but he looks as though he doesn't know how to arrest a slide when his team don't have the momentum in a game, whether it be tactical or motivational, and those moments don't come often for Spurs or Southampton managers but they come every game for United managers seeing as it's the other teams cup final.
Well Di Matteo was playing the most reactive football I think I've ever seen so I would say that he fluked his way to a CL win, and there's also evidence to suggest Terry was doing a lot of the leading in that team. Zidane is objectively the better manager but I don't think he'll fit at United, he'll just be a big name flop, the PSG model doesn't work for us.