beingshe7don
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Messages
- 2,735
Looks like we're going for Lacazette and Perisic. We'll be paying over the top for average players.
Looks like we're going for Lacazette and Perisic. We'll be paying over the top for average players.
Why would Griezmann mean we have to sign a lesser midfielder? Lukaku will cost just as much as Griezmann.
Looks like we're going for Lacazette and Perisic. We'll be paying over the top for average players.
We did go with memphis and had januzaj it turned out bad.
What ? When our main striker scored 28 goals last season .Yes but a flat track bully would have put us in the top four this season easily
See post aboveWe need a flat track bully.
Over ten of those goals were in other comps.What ? When our main striker scored 28 goals last season .
Nah mate think your wrong there .
It's the likes of the midfield and wide men's poor goal return that cost us top 4
So never again? We also used to buy players like Ronaldo, Carrick, Hernandez. It worked to supplement big signings.We did go with memphis and had januzaj it turned out bad.
Too small for Mourinho. I'd imagine.Lacazette
What ? When our main striker scored 28 goals last season .
Nah mate think your wrong there .
It's the likes of the midfield and wide men's poor goal return that cost us top 4
Anyone complaining Lukaku only scores against small teams at home is forgetting last season already. Guy scored 4 against 11 man Bournemouth ffs.
I'm not sure replacing zlatan with lukaku last season would have gaurenteed top 4 imo.Over ten of those goals were in other comps.
Zlatan scored 17 in the league. Similar to King and Benteke (don't know if those two took penalties as well) Add a striker like Lukaku instead and we'd be top four based on his return.
If its such a priority and one of the best available (Aubameyang) is going for £61m you have to wonder why the feck we haven't been all over that deal. He's just scored 40 goals and last year bagged 39 as well, yet we'll probably go pay a higher fee for Lacazette or Lukaku.
It's a well known fact that Benzema is Perez's darling. I don't know why you insist on the opposite, especially without any evidence.
Perez: “At this moment, for me he is going to stay here forever. But now we do not speak of this. If it’s up to me, I am sure that he is going to stay here all his life.”
Bleacherreport: "It seems Ronaldo suffers for being an ugly stepchild in the eyes of Perez, especially compared to the other Galactico signings. When it comes to the likes of James Rodriguez and Karim Benzema, Perez indulges those players. They're his adopted sons. Perez took time out of his business schedule to fly to Benzema's house in Lyon, France, to coax him into joining Real Madrid. He also sold striker Gonzalo Higuain, who was signed by Calderon, and replaced him with Javier Hernandez, a squad player who wasn't a rival to Benzema."
Benzema, chouchou de Perez - by sports.fr
http://www.sports.fr/football/espagne/articles/benzema-chouchou-de-perez-1439758/
Again, et cetera - there are tons of evidence that Perez is his number 1 fan - and has been over the years.
I hope you're jokingIf we get stuck Gabbiadini anyone ?
What about the others in the top 10? Shouldn't we be looking at them as well? We're the richest club in the worldSome stats to consider:
15th: Belotti (16/17)
Into the top 15 we go, and at 15th place we’ve got Torino’s number 9, Andrea Belotti. The Italian striker has really bloomed this season, scoring an impressive 22 goals so far, with a conversion rate of 25.5%.
14th: Edinson Cavani (16/17)
Even though he’s got a label on him as a “bottler,” Cavani keeps performing. The Uruguayan striker, who was born in the same year and city as Luis Suarez, has scored 27 goals this season, averaging a goal every 84 minutes. His conversion rate of 25.9% is quite impressive for a “bottler”.
13th: Romelu Lukaku (16/17)
Despite often being mocked for his heavy first touch, there’s no denying that Lukaku is a fantastic goalscorer. The tall Belgian striker has scored 20 goals this season, with an exquisite conversion rate of 26.6%.
12th: Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (16/17)
Coming in for his second inclusion on the list, it’s Aubameyang! The rapid striker has scored 23 goals in as many games, with a 27% conversion rate. Despite being born in France, Aubameyang chose to represent his father’s native country, Gabon.
11th: Harry Kane (16/17)
Kane also comes in for his second inclusion, with him only just missing out on the top 10. Kane often gets abuse for being a “tap-in merchant” and a “penalty merchant,” traits that provide a shade of doubt to his goal scoring credentials if you believe them to be true. He has, with a conversion rate of 27.5%, scored 19 goals so far this season.
7th: Kylian Mbappe Lottin (16/17)
Despite the fact that he’s only 18, he’s scored 12 goals for Monaco this season, helping them to the top of the table (as of right now). All this with the highly impressive conversion rate of 28.5%. Not your average teenager.
5th: Alexander Lacazette (16/17)
Lacazette is back for his second inclusion in the top 10. In the 16/17 season the Frenchman has scored 23 goals so far with a conversion rate of 29.7%.
www.eifsoccer.com/articles/conversion-rate/ dated March so not totally up to date.
Seems Lacazette is a world class clinical finisher. As is Mbappe. Lukaku and Kane not far behind.
What about the others in the top 10? Shouldn't we be looking at them as well? We're the richest club in the world
Is it really a good indicator of quality then?Anthony Modeste, Carlos Bacca,Dario Cvitanich and Bas Dost are the rest of the top 10.
Is it really a good indicator of quality then?
Exactly what I thought and said. Would much rather play Rashford / Martial (then Ibra) with a world class creator coming in behind them rather than splashing £100m on Lukaku or whoever and relying on Lingard to pull the strings.I don't really see the point of (apparently) forgetting about Griezmann to focus on a #9. We already have Martial and Rashford who can play there and we could surely retain Zlatan? If we have to wait a few months for Zlatan to return then we could simply use one of our 'hot young prospects' to cover for him? If we're really desperate though, just buy Hernandez to cover? He'd be pretty cheap.
I'd much prefer to do this than sacrifice getting top drawer support for the attack. I'd suggest that:
Mkhitaryan Griezmann PerisicLooks like a much better option than:
Rashford/(Zlatan)
Lingard Mkhitaryan PerisicWhich would arguably be a worse attack than last season. Obviously I'm going with the idea that we were apparently buying Griezmann as a support attacker (hence the switch to search for #9).
Lukaku
I'm not sure Rashford or Martial would link up well with Griezmann to be totally honest. They are more direct in their style of play; preferring to turn on the ball and run at the back line rather than holding it up and link in other attackers (like Ibra does). Obviously they will attempt to enhance this part of their game but can't see a huge improvement being made within a summer, and they do need to hugely improve this side of their game.Exactly what I thought and said. Would much rather play Rashford / Martial (then Ibra) with a world class creator coming in behind them rather than splashing £100m on Lukaku or whoever and relying on Lingard to pull the strings.
If its such a priority and one of the best available (Aubameyang) is going for £61m you have to wonder why the feck we haven't been all over that deal. He's just scored 40 goals and last year bagged 39 as well, yet we'll probably go pay a higher fee for Lacazette or Lukaku.
Lacazette all day long for me.
I have Dost in my pick 4Anthony Modeste, Carlos Bacca,Dario Cvitanich and Bas Dost are the rest of the top 10.
Credible sources or are they just picking up the goal.com story?Right now there's rumors in german media of MUFC interest in Werder Bremen's Max Kruse.
You know you want someone with a name like this.