Oranges038
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2020
- Messages
- 14,936
It’ll be Eurovision next
No such luck.
It’ll be Eurovision next
They are dirt poor. I was there as a humanitarian and their medical equipment is old Soviet stuf from 1980ish. Computers are old x286, x386 not even fecking Pentium 1.Too expensive for them. Bribe inflation and all.
This has seemed inevitable for many years. The future of the World Cup seems to be a procession around various wealthy dictatorships with the occasional visit to Europe to save some face and the continuing attempt to break into the US sports market. It will be a first in that fans can’t even visit two of the cities of the host country unless they belong to a particular religion.
But you won't catch a bus? You'll still put their oil in your car?Because it's an infernal huge country with few rights for women and even fewer for homosexuals, transgender people etc.
The global economy is, unfortunately, dependent on Saudi oil, and so boycotting it isn’t a realistic option, especially as most other fossil fuel exporters are just as bad or worse. But it’s frankly daft to say that just because we buy their oil we should be happy when they buy up and corrupt football and other parts of our culture. The global economy wouldn’t collapse if FIFA was less corrupt and stopped giving these countries World Cups in exchange for shed loads of cash in brown envelopes.
Anyone wants to boycott the US WC for not having gun laws, racism in policing, allowing people to die because of costly health insurance and medical procedures, exporting obesity to Mexico and all around the world, multiple wars resulting in instability and creation of huge terrorist groups, support of Israel led genocide and hundreds of other things in last 7 decades?
You think I have a car? Can't believe you think so highly of meBut you won't catch a bus? You'll still put their oil in your car?
Restrictions on which fans can attend WCs aren't new.
For WCs in the Europe and the US, you can forget about a large proportion of fans from the Global South being allowed visas and permits to attend such tournaments.
Ok. I assume then that no matches would be scheduled to take place there.Anywhere but Mecca/Medina (unless they're Muslim)
This is truly a pathetic comment.Brilliant. Feck morals, can't wait for western countries to get on their high horse just before the tournament as well.
The state of play on the pitch has zero to do with where it's held. It was still a shite WC aside from the product on the pitch.Will probably end up being brilliant like Qatar despite the obvious moral issues at hand.
This is truly a pathetic comment.
F*ck this sport.
I absolutely do not. Many slaves will die to build a world cup hosted in a country where it is illegal to be homosexual and where women's rights are severely restricted. That is not a thing to celebrate.But you can see where he’s coming from - zero pressure from the West to restrain Israel from annihilating Gaza with 4,000 women and children dead (and counting). But we can feel good wearing rainbow bands and complaining about the Saudis making women cover up.
I absolutely do not. Many slaves will die to build a world cup hosted in a country where it is illegal to be homosexual and where women's rights are severely restricted. That is not a thing to celebrate.
Every Western country has trade with Saudi. You fill up the gas every other morning supplied by the Saudis. Why is there an issue if a football World Cup is hosted there?
Well how else do you travel? Obviously you're not allowed to own a horse anymore.You think I have a car? Can't believe you think so highly of me
You tell people to 'get a grip' for criticising Saudi's bid, but then say your impression is 'they have bribed their way to it' while admitting you have 'not properly researched this', reflecting your own apparent biases.To those making a fuss just because it is the Saudis and those who think football is only European and South American, get a grip.
Pardon me, I couldn't think of way to sound more polite. Football is a global sport, stop banging on about football heritage. You don't have to be the best to host, but you should have a decent track record to host so as to maintain a good quality of football. Saudis have more often than not qualified for the world cup on sporting merit for quite awhile now. Many other host nations have not, like when the US first hosted it(yes they were in the in the early editions but only be it wasn't a "real" world cup yet). I am all for the US in the next edition as they have been doing pretty well for sometime now.
I am not too please with the Saudis winning the hosting rights as there is a feeling that they have bribed their way to it. I have not properly researched so I may be wrong but that's the impression I get. This seems like the only good reason to be displeased. Also it was only recently we had a world cup in the same region, would much prefer it to be some other part of the world.
For those who think it shouldn't be the Saudis holding a world cup because of human rights etc., you may have a point. But my personal opinion is that sports is a platform for unity or at least platform to learn/understand each other, no matter how much or little that is. I am aware sports and politics are not completely separate, especially our beloved football, there are times where matches/teams/players almost represent a political struggle(Socrates/Corinthians comes to mind). I believe sports is a platform and we should let field take stage. What I mean is Russians or Ukrainians, Israelis or Palestinian should all play.
Let us support the champions of our choice(political or sporting), after all we are free to jeer our opponents. All the warring and boycotting can be done outside of sports.
I hope I've articulated well, feel free to poke holes at it, I may not reply but I will definitely and might just reevaluate my beliefs.
To those making a fuss just because it is the Saudis and those who think football is only European and South American, get a grip.
Pardon me, I couldn't think of way to sound more polite. Football is a global sport, stop banging on about football heritage. You don't have to be the best to host, but you should have a decent track record to host so as to maintain a good quality of football. Saudis have more often than not qualified for the world cup on sporting merit for quite awhile now. Many other host nations have not, like when the US first hosted it(yes they were in the in the early editions but only be it wasn't a "real" world cup yet). I am all for the US in the next edition as they have been doing pretty well for sometime now.
I am not too please with the Saudis winning the hosting rights as there is a feeling that they have bribed their way to it. I have not properly researched so I may be wrong but that's the impression I get. This seems like the only good reason to be displeased. Also it was only recently we had a world cup in the same region, would much prefer it to be some other part of the world.
For those who think it shouldn't be the Saudis holding a world cup because of human rights etc., you may have a point. But my personal opinion is that sports is a platform for unity or at least platform to learn/understand each other, no matter how much or little that is. I am aware sports and politics are not completely separate, especially our beloved football, there are times where matches/teams/players almost represent a political struggle(Socrates/Corinthians comes to mind). I believe sports is a platform and we should let field take stage. What I mean is Russians or Ukrainians, Israelis or Palestinian should all play.
Let us support the champions of our choice(political or sporting), after all we are free to jeer our opponents. All the warring and boycotting can be done outside of sports.
I hope I've articulated well, feel free to poke holes at it, I may not reply but I will definitely and might just reevaluate my beliefs.