For reference, what did his model say about 2020?
He was still with FiveThirtyEight back then. Biden had an 89% chance of winning.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/final-2020-presidential-election-forecast/
Famously, Clinton had a 60% chance on election day.
Same model, I'm pretty sure (with tweaks).
Just looking at it now, and 538's final prediction had Florida at 55.1% chance of going to Hillary. Seems a bit silly now, but obviously much has happened in eight years.She was at 71.4% People seem to think it was scandalous that someone with a 28.6 chance could be successful.
Just looking at it now, and 538's final prediction had Florida at 55.1% chance of going to Hillary. Seems a bit silly now, but obviously much has happened in eight years.
Yeah, I seem to remember there was some shenanigans there in 2000.FL was a bonafide swing state before Trump showed up, so with the right candidate, the Dems could've won it. Now, under Trump, its next to impossible since the three key groups necessary to win the state are all in his back pocket.
That means there was a 40% chance that the other candidate wins, which is a pretty high probability. Clinton was the favorite, but 60-40 means that she was the slight favorite, not the Chicago Bulls of 1996 vs. my kids type of advantage.Famously, Clinton had a 60% chance on election day.
FL was a bonafide swing state before Trump showed up, so with the right candidate, the Dems could've won it. Now, under Trump, its next to impossible since the three key groups necessary to win the state are all in his back pocket.
FL might be less red than we make of it. The average lead of Trump is under 4%. Not nothing, especially in the old standards of Florida, but it’s not like in 2022.It wasn't too long ago that Andrew Gillum nearly beat Ron DeSantis in the gubernatorial race.
Not sure where he is now!?!?!
Do any of his supporters buy this trash ?
Although probably not the same FiveThirtyEight model as now, since the new guy who runs it seems to have a different philosophy/approach on how the model should work.
It wasn't too long ago that Andrew Gillum nearly beat Ron DeSantis in the gubernatorial race.
Not sure where he is now!?!?!
These guys have 77% chance for Trump.
AZ seems to be slipping away for the Dems, which will probably allow Trump to spend more of his time and money in the rust belt.
These guys have 77% chance for Trump.
Some good state and national polls for Harris at the end of the week. This is just one of them.
Nationally, the polls show that she’s up ~3%, on average. She seems ahead in MI, WI by 2-3 and in PA by 1-2 points. In the sunbelt it’s 0-1 points, or (-1) to 1 points.
I find her numbers in FL encouraging: down 3-4 points only. Not saying that she will win FL, but this number shows strength across the board.
With 5 weeks to go, I can’t see Trump as the favorite.
Can we talk about Tim Walz?
Very likable guy, but apart from a couple of speeches to union workers and him tinkering with his air filter, I have not seen him anywhere since the DNC. I have seen Josh Shapiro more on TV since than Walz. And i have seen 10x more of Vance than Walz, even though Vance shoots himself in the D every time he speaks!
Is he moving the needle at all?
If she loses PA, then not picking Shapiro will be one of the reasons as to why. As has been pointed out, AZ seems to be slipping away and she could have picked a goddamn Astronaut from Arizona!!!
I honestly still think that she made a good choice.Can we talk about Tim Walz?
Very likable guy, but apart from a couple of speeches to union workers and him tinkering with his air filter, I have not seen him anywhere since the DNC. I have seen Josh Shapiro more on TV since than Walz. And i have seen 10x more of Vance than Walz, even though Vance shoots himself in the D every time he speaks!
Is he moving the needle at all?
If she loses PA, then not picking Shapiro will be one of the reasons as to why. As has been pointed out, AZ seems to be slipping away and she could have picked a goddamn Astronaut from Arizona!!!
These guys have 77% chance for Trump.
Part of it is by design, as in, you never want your VP candidate in the news all the time. If they are, it’s either because they’ve said something controversial or because they are so competent that they’re outperforming the person who selected them. Nice and slightly anonymous is the ideal combination. Also, he’s probably been preparing for the VP debate next week, so both him and Vance aren’t likely to be doing much media between now and the debate.
Vance has been everywhere and has just again spoken out against the media for exposing his lies about the Haitians migrants stoey and said 'People should be allowed to speak their truth and not be challenged for speaking it'
He's off his fecking head.
Not on US msm tv he hasn’t. He did a round of interviews to push back against criticisms about Springfield a while back, but has since not been on as much.
Body language says everything. He's fuming, he clearly doesn't want to be there and certainly doesn't want to be used as a political pawn like this, hear Putin mentioned all the time and have to listen to the stream of lies coming out of Don's mouth.
He shouldn’t be put in this position, but Trump could be the next president of the United States….
These Zelenskyy/Trump clips are quite something.
I think it was 70, but one in three is very far from a sure thing. It was close.Famously, Clinton had a 60% chance on election day.