How so?
He would be one of the leading contenders next time if Harris loses. Shapiro, Whitmer, Buttigieg, and maybe Pritzger as well.
How so?
OK, so I read it (now) as evangelicals who support Trump, which is indeed cognitive dissonance at its finest. 39% of Democrats responded "none" or "other" when asked about religious affiliation, while 38% chose "Protestant" and 23% "Catholic". So Christians as a loosely defined group are still 64% of the Democratic Party. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1411981/us-religious-identity-of-republicans-and-democrats-2023/ and https://www.pewresearch.org/religio...base/compare/christians/by/party-affiliation/The fervour and actual beliefs of evangelicals - plus the implications of the tenants - make them a special case to me. In terms of how one should live their lives given said beliefs. But not a topic for here.
Also the fact that these pious folk are willing to almost universally get behind Donald f*cking Trump pretty much just shows you who they are.
In 2025 and beyond there will likely be another reason why they can’t enact it. Imo this just a standard party promise which they throw to the base knowing they will never have to do anything about it.Democrats couldn't enact it in 2016 because that election didn't exactly break our way, to put it mildly. In 2020, holdouts like Manchin and Sinema torpedoed most of Biden's agenda from day 1, including the Build Back Better plan, voting rights, you name it. With Republicans controlling the House and a divided Senate, legislation is not going to sail through.
It might seem that way but I promise you we are serious about it this time, just like Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown.In 2025 and beyond there will likely be another reason why they can’t enact it. Imo this just a standard party promise which they throw to the base knowing they will never have to do anything about it.
In 2025 and beyond there will likely be another reason why they can’t enact it. Imo this just a standard party promise which they throw to the base knowing they will never have to do anything about it.
It might seem that way but I promise you we are serious about it this time, just like Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown.
True but also means its pretty much a utopian promise as well. At the very least if the conditions needed are completely democratic control then voters should be told this.That's pretty normal in the US. Politicians promise things but after winning, often lack the political capitol to implement any of what they promised.
Once Kennedy resigns which appears quite likely, some of his votes are inevitably going to shift to Trump. It appears that Trump is still favorite but not an overwhelming one like he used to be when Biden was still in the race.This should be a massive wake up call for Harris supporters. All of the hard work still lies ahead.
Also, the weekly trend on Silver's site is slowly, but unmistakably moving back towards Trump.
Once Kennedy resigns which appears quite likely, some of his votes are inevitably going to shift to Trump. It appears that Trump is still favorite but not an overwhelming one like he used to be when Biden was still in the race.
Once Kennedy resigns which appears quite likely, some of his votes are inevitably going to shift to Trump. It appears that Trump is still favorite but not an overwhelming one like he used to be when Biden was still in the race.
Which is fair, he’s a Tim Mellon plant.
I do not see RFK dropping out as bad for the Democrats. More an indication that the people funding him to run have realised he wasn't going to succeed as a spoiler for the Democratic vote.
I do not see RFK dropping out as bad for the Democrats. More an indication that the people funding him to run have realised he wasn't going to succeed as a spoiler for the Democratic vote.
Yeah unlike 2016 the last couple of elections actually overestimated the extent of support Republicans have.I don't think Trump is the favorite anymore, personal opinion, elections since dobbs underestimate dems often, and pollsters says they have tried to adjust for 2020, though who knows.
There is also the fact that there is no "energy" around Trump these days, but he can win an uphill battle, like in 2016, of course.
Well I would be more than happy, if Harris became the next president and continued Biden policies.From what I gathered, the speech had a good dose of racism, war-mongering, and misinformation. So not different from Biden which is expected.
How? What has Trump done to change the trend? All I saw of him on YouTube is whining, rambling, personal attacks. Never saw him so tired and devoid of energy.Also, the weekly trend on Silver's site is slowly, but unmistakably moving back towards Trump.
How? What has Trump done to change the trend? All I saw of him on YouTube is whining, rambling, personal attacks. Never saw him so tired and devoid of energy.
Regression to the mean after a hype bump, I’d guess. Which would mean Trump is unlikely to keep rising if he doesn’t change his demeanour. Which he’s unable to. Still way more potential upside for Harris.How? What has Trump done to change the trend? All I saw of him on YouTube is whining, rambling, personal attacks. Never saw him so tired and devoid of energy.
Like a technical rebound after a stock market crash?Its more so a reversion to a new mean imo. Harris' initial rise was so strong that once it settled, Trump was bound to claw back some of her gains once he started negatively messaging about her being a communist, being responsible for the border crisis etc.
Do you mean actually it's not Trump getting more votes but Harris losing some support because her momentum after replacing Biden is losing steam?Trump's own favorables have a ceiling of around 44-45%. Harris has a much higher ceiling, so Trump's strategy to win will be to lower her favorable numbers and raise her unfavorables so that it suppresses her turnout enough for him to win in November. It worked with Hillary and didn't work with Biden, so we will see what happens this time.
Like a technical rebound after a stock market crash?
Do you mean actually it's not Trump getting more votes but Harris losing some support because her momentum after replacing Biden is losing steam?
Its more so a reversion to a new mean imo. Harris' initial rise was so strong that once it settled, Trump was bound to claw back some of her gains once he started negatively messaging about her being a communist, being responsible for the border crisis etc.
Trump's own favorables have a ceiling of around 44-45%. Harris has a much higher ceiling, so Trump's strategy to win will be to lower her favorable numbers and raise her unfavorables so that it suppresses her turnout enough for him to win in November. It worked with Hillary and didn't work with Biden, so we will see what happens this time.
Not according to Stormy Daniels.
Can't believe this got no love. You deserved better mate.
His numbers were declining and many who supported him were disillusioned Democrats who won't vote for Trump no matter who endorses him.That is certainly bad news, no way around it.
Can't believe this got no love. You deserved better mate.
The biggest donut in that shop was Vance..
His numbers were declining and many who supported him were disillusioned Democrats who won't vote for Trump no matter who endorses him.
I think most of his supporters will not vote at all.Every percentage matters, he still had like 4% of the national vote, if he convinces that extra 1% to go with Trump, could be all the difference.
I think most of his supporters will not vote at all.
you prefer a neocon who started 2 wars, violated civil liberties with the Patriot Act and presided over the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression?. I definitely prefer somebody like Bush in the oval office to a lunatic and ticking timebomb like Trump.