Eyepopper
Lowering the tone since 2006
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 67,299
This is fascinating...
It was for me!Skits are supposed to be funny. Yours wasn't. It was barely even legalable.
Everyone knows the best jokes are the ones that you laugh at yourself and noone else does.It was for me!
Gotcha is a boring game, but you're taking the wrong perspective on this. That cult will not change no matter what happens, so thinking about them for the fall elections would be a complete waste of time for the Dems. (Long-term, sure; short-term, no.) They need to address the people on the fence. They know Trump inside and out, so there isn't huge gain possible there (apart from reminders of the negatives), but Vance is an unknown that's now being defined to the public. So this is really the moment to make really clear where he stands on societal issues, in hopes that that will rub off on Trump and voting choices.So the strategy is now, ha! JD Vance says weird contradictory things!
Surely at some point the democrats will realise that the republican cult simply doesn't care? They'll just say nuh-uh and move on.
very true, usually because you are the only who gets the joke/point!Everyone knows the best jokes are the ones that you laugh at yourself and noone else does.
That's fair enough. Also as @Iker Quesadillas said, should Trump die in office this is the replacement.Gotcha is a boring game, but you're taking the wrong perspective on this. That cult will not change no matter what happens, so thinking about them for the fall elections would be a complete waste of time for the Dems. (Long-term, sure; short-term, no.) They need to address the people on the fence. They know Trump inside and out, so there isn't huge gain possible there (apart from reminders of the negatives), but Vance is an unknown that's now being defined to the public. So this is really the moment to make really clear where he stands on societal issues, in hopes that that will rub off on Trump and voting choices.
Like Palin previously. Incredibly irresponsible choices, but then they're putting Trump forward as the main candidate, so...That's fair enough. Also as @Iker Quesadillas said, should Trump die in office this is the replacement.
Imagine that, a Twitter ragebait troll as POTUS.
Please stop.very true, usually because you are the only who gets the joke/point!
I don’t think Vance is really that bad for what he is, but more for what he isn’t. People put off by Vance will already have been put off by Trump, so it’s more the opportunity missed to balance the ticket or shore up a specific swing state.
That would be an incredible showing of weakness. Trump would show indecisiveness and poor judgement in the lead up to November. Some would even say he is deferring to the MSM that are really coming after Vance.Bergum would've done that for Trump. An anomymous, agreeable Pence like conservative who would've taken the VP issue off the table for Trump. As it stands, I'd be surprised if Trump doesn't consider making a change before the election.
That would be an incredible showing of weakness. Trump would show indecisiveness and poor judgement in the lead up to November. Some would even say he is deferring to the MSM that are really coming after Vance.
Anything is possible, but I’d be very surprised.
That would be an incredible showing of weakness. Trump would show indecisiveness and poor judgement in the lead up to November. Some would even say he is deferring to the MSM that are really coming after Vance.
Anything is possible, but I’d be very surprised.
Very true. I still think Trump is too proud to do it, but it would definitely be really funny.Then again, we are talking about news cycles that goes to next subject so fast that even an assasination attempt is no longer the main story, less than a week after it happened.
Few will remember than Vance was replaced, if it happens soon.
What would be the consequences behind the scenes though? Vance represents some pretty powerful backers. Wouldn't it hurt Trump if those soured on him? Because replacing Vance would put a serious dent in his career.It would. But the alternative is for Trump to continue to be disappointed in Vance's lack of popularity.
What would be the consequences behind the scenes though? Vance represents some pretty powerful backers. Wouldn't it hurt Trump if those soured on him? Because replacing Vance would put a serious dent in his career.
Yeah, but it seems like Thiel c.s. are planning to take over the party from within. How would they take the frustration?Ultimately its still a cult and Trump is the leader. If someone like Thiel pulls his funding, there are others who will step in, because Republicans know they can't afford to lose to Harris.
Yeah, but it seems like Thiel c.s. are planning to take over the party from within. How would they take the frustration?
Also, do you mean losing in general or to Harris specifically? If so, why? Cause she'd likely be a lock for the next elections then as well?
It's remarkable, isn't it. Biden's stepping down and the renewed energy in the Democratic Party have changed the momentum.It's amazing how wrong I seem to have been about the assassination attempt being the defining campaign moment and sealing a Trump second term. That stuff feels like a data point fro a year ago.
Long may it continue.It's remarkable, isn't it. Biden's stepping down and the renewed energy in the Democratic Party have changed the momentum.
It's amazing how wrong I seem to have been about the assassination attempt being the defining campaign moment and sealing a Trump second term. That stuff feels like a data point from a year ago.
Ehm...
It's remarkable, isn't it. Biden's stepping down and the renewed energy in the Democratic Party have changed the momentum.
Also saw a recent NH poll where Harris was well up with numbers resembling Biden's 2020 win margin. Hillary and Trump were basically tied there in 16.
I still don't get how Trump can have a slight national lead over Harris, if state polling is kinda okay for her.
Too early to conclude much though.
I don't think that's the main effect we'd see.Also, how many people are going to be like "mmm I was going to vote for Donald fecking Trump, but his VP is a bit of a cnut, so now I won't"?
“WE HAVE A FORMER TECH VC IN THE WHITE HOUSE GREATEST COUNTRY ON EARTH BABY,” Delian Asparouhov, a partner at Thiel’s Founder’s Fund, wrote on X after the announcement of Vance’s nomination.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/07/28/jd-vance-peter-thiel-donors-big-tech-trump-vp/Thiel made him wealthy, setting him up to invest in companies that became popular with the MAGA set. He shepherded Vance’s entry into politics, bankrolling, alongside other Silicon Valley donors, his successful bid for the U.S. Senate in 2022.