It’s about 70/30 from Biden according to RFK’s sister Rory.
What % of the vote a candidate gets is irrelevant, electoral college votes are what matterPardon my ignorance but wouldn’t there be a need for a 2nd round given that none of the 3 candidates would get more than 50% of the vote? What weird system if that’s so. Also Biden is toast in a 3 horse race for sure, it has been evident for a while from polls that RFK is taking away from Biden much more than he’s from Trump.
Not true. If no candidate gets 270 it moves to the House who choose between the top 3 EC vote getters.What % of the vote a candidate gets is irrelevant, electoral college votes are what matter
That's true but still irrelevant to the % of votes a candidate getsNot true. If no candidate gets 270 it moves to the House who choose between the top 3 EC vote getters.
In other words: a candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win. However, a candidate doesn’t need 50% of the votes in a state to win its electoral votes, nor does the candidate need 50% nationally.That's true but still irrelevant to the % of votes a candidate gets
270 is needed to win outright but if that number isn't reached then the House of Representatives decides, say Biden got 260, Trump got 240 and RFK Jr got 38 - the House could select RFK Jr in theory though TBH yuu've more chance of being that luck bstard in New Jersey that this scenario happening!In other words: a candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win. However, a candidate doesn’t need 50% of the votes in a state to win its electoral votes, nor does the candidate need 50% nationally.
Why would Kennedy run at all? He has no chance to win. Only to harm Biden and his own party?
Meh, his appeal is pretty much conspiracy theory + name recognition m, not white bread, boring, sensible enough for the traditional National Review reading Republicans. The conspiracy theorists on GOP side are all Trumpists.He's got plenty of appeal to some Republican voters, so it's not a given that he will harm the Democrats more.
270 is needed to win outright but if that number isn't reached then the House of Representatives decides, say Biden got 260, Trump got 240 and RFK Jr got 38 - the House could select RFK Jr in theory though TBH yuu've more chance of being that luck bstard in New Jersey that this scenario happening!
In 92 Perot got 0 electoral votes despite getting 19% of the popular vote and leading polls before he drooped out.
There is no chance RFK jr gets any electoral votes. RFK is completely irrelevant in the grand scheme and likely doesn't take any meaningful votes from either candidate.
All he has to do is spoil some combo PA, AZ, GA, or WI and trump is back.. About 100K votes will do it
He's not totally irrelevant, one can easily envisage him being the difference in close states, the current theory is that he takes more votes from Biden than Trump, that definitely might have affected the GA result in 2020, it's not likely I agree but he's not completely irrrelevantIn 92 Perot got 0 electoral votes despite getting 19% of the popular vote and leading polls before he drooped out.
There is no chance RFK jr gets any electoral votes. RFK is completely irrelevant in the grand scheme and likely doesn't take any meaningful votes from either candidate.
He's not totally irrelevant, one can easily envisage him being the difference in close states, the current theory is that he takes more votes from Biden than Trump, that definitely might have affected the GA result in 2020, it's not likely I agree but he's not completely irrrelevant
Meh, his appeal is pretty much conspiracy theory + name recognition m, not white bread, boring, sensible enough for the traditional National Review reading Republicans. The conspiracy theorists on GOP side are all Trumpists.
Tbf when every Tom Dick And Harry can run for office, the word ‘politician’ kinda loses any significant meaning.WTF is wrong with America? Every second politician is some weirdo believing in conspiracy theories. Now even within the Democrat party?
This is exactly why I was thinking Biden isn’t doing as strong as some here feel.
https://eu.azcentral.com/story/news...ar-a-shadow-of-his-2020-campaign/73133526007/
Arizona GOP is still in bad shape, it seems.
I'm unsure of the logic here, they seem to be under the impression that they will be immune from Trump or somehow believe this is exacting revenge for Biden's Israel policy? These are exactly the type of protestors Trump wanted to shoot.
Have sections of the left seemingly talked themselves into "well if Trump is elected at least our ideological war is more pure?"
I'm unsure of the logic here, they seem to be under the impression that they will be immune from Trump or somehow believe this is exacting revenge for Biden's Israel policy? These are exactly the type of protestors Trump wanted to shoot.
Have sections of the left seemingly talked themselves into "well if Trump is elected at least our ideological war is more pure?"
The situation for the palestinians can get worse with trump in the sense of destruction and killing because israel is doing what they please and biden is giving them what they want to bomb the shit out of them. With trump the only thing that would change is that instead of seeing tweets like: " Biden doesnt pick the phone to netanyahu and is very very very mad holding his breath", Trump would laugh at palestinian faces. But the death and destruction will be the same
They will change hypocresy for humilliation
Sure, but I'm not so much talking about the policy they are protesting. I'm more focused on what they are actually trying to get across here. They are essentially saying "haha you're supporting Biden, and we won't vote for him, so enjoy Trump ". Basically trying to "shame" democrats. But do these people really believe that they will be able to protest Trump's Israel policy with a Trump admin that has no one in place to stop his orders or talk him down?
I guess what i'm confused about is that are trying to shame others with the fear of Trump, but this dude will either be straight up shot at protests or in prison for terrorism offences under any Trump admin. It's like he's trying to shame others with his own pending oppression.
I'm unsure of the logic here, they seem to be under the impression that they will be immune from Trump or somehow believe this is exacting revenge for Biden's Israel policy? These are exactly the type of protestors Trump wanted to shoot.
Have sections of the left seemingly talked themselves into "well if Trump is elected at least our ideological war is more pure?"
Sure, but I'm not so much talking about the policy they are protesting. I'm more focused on what they are actually trying to get across here. They are essentially saying "haha you're supporting Biden, and we won't vote for him, so enjoy Trump ". Basically trying to "shame" democrats. But do these people really believe that they will be able to protest Trump's Israel policy with a Trump admin that has no one in place to stop his orders or talk him down?
I guess what i'm confused about is that are trying to shame others with the fear of Trump, but this dude will either be straight up shot at protests or in prison for terrorism offences under any Trump admin. It's like he's trying to shame others with his own pending oppression.
In 2020, there were Americans arrested by unidentified masked agents who were put in unidentified cars and taken to unknown locations. Protesters were pepper sprayed at Lafayette Square so that Trump could take a photo with the Bible upside down.Were many people shot at protests or imprisoned under terrorism offences when protesting under the last Trump presidency?
No, but he did ask his defense secretary if he could bring in the army and shoot protesters in the legs. The DefSec was not MAGA enough to say “sure”, but I have the feeling the next one would not be so constitutionally curious.Were many people shot at protests or imprisoned under terrorism offences when protesting under the last Trump presidency?
I'm unsure of the logic here, they seem to be under the impression that they will be immune from Trump or somehow believe this is exacting revenge for Biden's Israel policy? These are exactly the type of protestors Trump wanted to shoot.
Have sections of the left seemingly talked themselves into "well if Trump is elected at least our ideological war is more pure?"
I'm unsure of the logic here, they seem to be under the impression that they will be immune from Trump or somehow believe this is exacting revenge for Biden's Israel policy? These are exactly the type of protestors Trump wanted to shoot.
Have sections of the left seemingly talked themselves into "well if Trump is elected at least our ideological war is more pure?"