Maybe a dumb question but that's a good thing, isn't it? Besides his age, the main criticism regarding Biden was his support of Israel so Trump doubling down on that support should alienate the same people I expect
The trouble for Biden was that all those voters upset at the US's unstinting support of Israel are on the left side of the political spectrum, so would never vote for Trump anyway, Trump's side love Israel!Maybe a dumb question but that's a good thing, isn't it? Besides his age, the main criticism regarding Biden was his support of Israel so Trump doubling down on that support should alienate the same people I expect
Just being too old to run. Like Biden.
On the other hand maybe he wants to complete his own hattrick. Losing 3 elections in a row.
Honestly, I wouldn't mind, if he run again in 2028. First it means he will lose 2024 and secondly it will be even more fun as he will be even more unhinged.
You surely meant egomaniac.
It gets A LOT worse. She also handed Trump a cheque for $100 MILLION DOLLARS and after presenting him with the cheque she gave a speech urging Trump to annex the West Bank and to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state.
How is that legal? Literally buying the President in front of the world.
It's also massively hypocritical (shock, horror) because back in 2016 Trump attacked Marco Rubio for accepting donations from the same family and said Rubio would just become an Adleson pet.
I too am a hypocrite for staying at The Palazzo. Those suites are to die for though!
That's not a high bar to clear considering he owns nothing anymore.Sheldon doesn't own it anymore so you're safe.
The trouble for Biden was that all those voters upset at the US's unstinting support of Israel are on the left side of the political spectrum, so would never vote for Trump anyway, Trump's side love Israel!
Is it not an average of Washington Post conducted polls?How is their "polling average" calculated? Date range and does it include the junk like Rasmussen?
How is their "polling average" calculated? Date range and does it include the junk like Rasmussen?
And is about to be labelled a Commie
And is about to be labelled a Commie
And is about to be labelled a Commie
Trump has already started that. She's already getting hit by libs like Catherine Rampell on "price controls", which will only get amplified by Republicans. Never mind that none of these policies will ever happen since most involve support from Congress.
And? Whats the big worry? Republicans has been calling every democrat communist since Obama.
They are not serious people, if backing things child tax credits is "scary"(its actually popular with people), then i don't know what we are doing here.
How are the "commie" attacks on Walz working out for them, btw? Oh, when pointed out what he actually did, his approval rating went up, isn't it odd?
It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food. Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk.
At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat. (There’s a reason narrower “price gouging” laws that exist in some U.S. states are rarely invoked.) At worst, it might accidentally raise prices.
I'm somehow confused now. Over the last days all the networks are reporting that Harris took over the lead in most swing states except in Arizona.
If these figures are true, then Trump will still win the election despite all the negativity and feck ups of the last days.
What's actually true?
These not serious people currently run the House of Representatvives and will likley be running the Senate next year, one of them used to be the President, labels do matter sometimes, ask Bernie Sanders how being labeled a Commie helped end his bid to become PresidemtAnd? Whats the big worry? Republicans has been calling every democrat communist since Obama.
They are not serious people, if backing things child tax credits is "scary"(its actually popular with people), then i don't know what we are doing here.
How are the "commie" attacks on Walz working out for them, btw? Oh, when pointed out what he actually did, his approval rating went up, isn't it odd?
Hard to say. I am not sure if this is the same Wapo/ABC service that is the #2 rated pollster on FiveThirtyEight or another service. If you look at Silver's polls he looks at in various states, the results aren't particularly far off from this.
https://www.natesilver.net/p/where-harris-has-improved-the-most
Hard to say. I am not sure if this is the same Wapo/ABC service that is the #2 rated pollster on FiveThirtyEight or another service. If you look at Silver's polls he looks at in various states, the results aren't particularly far off from this.
https://www.natesilver.net/p/where-harris-has-improved-the-most
And is about to be labelled a Commie
I'll just never understand how the last week of Trump and Vance has seen them close in polls. It's been an absolute disaster. And yet.
Maybe. I just can't fathom the human beings that look st what those two people said over the past 10 days or so and fall on Trump's side.Its more so because Harris' energy is leveling out which is allowing Trump to regroup and make a bit of a comeback, especially after she starts announcing policies he can criticize.
Not really. It’s just a poll. Nothing changed from last week to this week that, in a statistical sense, would help Trump. Next week she could be up 3% again, even before the full impact of the DNC.Its more so because Harris' energy is leveling out which is allowing Trump to regroup and make a bit of a comeback, especially after she starts announcing policies he can criticize.
Maybe. I just can't fathom the human beings that look st what those two people said over the past 10 days or so and fall on Trump's side.
Honestly I'm rattled, felt like Harris' momentum would easily last through August. Especially with Trump self immolating. But America gonna America I guess.
Why should she need that big a gap?The amount of momentum she generated in the first few weeks definitely wasn't sustainable at such an intense level. If anything, she can continue to do well by way of the DNC convention next week and possibly in her debate against Trump. Beyond that, she is going to have to get back on the trail with Walz, for the remaining 2.5 months and go all in on the 7 or 8 swing states.
Her job is to sustain about a 4 point national lead and go into voting with 2-3 point leads in the key swing states. Trump has a pretty simple job of going negative on Harris and bringing her unfavorables up going into voting, which will suppress her turnout and help him win. He outperformed expectations in both of the two previous elections, so the Dems would be wise to not pretend they are going to win without a massive fight.
#electoralcollegeWhy should she need that big a gap?
I’m talking about the swing state gaps.#electoralcollege
Why should she need that big a gap?
It’s just noise, the Fox poll for instance is +/-4.5 MoE so it’s anywhere from Harris +4 to Trump +5. Realistically nothing has changed, if you get Monmouth +5 for her you will inevitably get something like this to balance it out.I'll just never understand how the last week of Trump and Vance has seen them close in polls. It's been an absolute disaster. And yet.