2024 U.S. Elections | Thread Closed

Status
Not open for further replies.
How much of a factor does Kamala and previously Hilary being a woman played in the way the two elections went?

Maybe some, but the main issues were unrelated

Hillary Clinton was negligent towards the rust belt

Kamala Harris is tarred by the 'Biden economy'
 
She essentially copied Joe's policies and practices; so why were they less inclined to vote for her?
they weren't? he quit in july with months of polls showing him down as much or more in all the states she lost, and he was also losing virginia and NH in some polls (where she has clung on). his approval rating has been sub-40% in all polls including exit polls after the election.

if you're comparing to 2020: covid and trump's handling of it was a big issue, raising questions about his competence, people had disliked having to hear about politics all the time, biden was the most generic politician imaginable, and would presumably fix those issues. in this election, the issues were different - no covid, it was about inflation and immigration. people want to see immigrants in camps, and they want cheaper burgers. they remembered the low inflation and tough rhetoric and actions of trump against migrants, and punished harris (and the biden admin she was part of) for the opposite.
 
And how would they have arrived at Newsom or Shapiro? Who would have chosen the candidate?

Harris was the incumbent VP, and it made sense given the timeline after Biden’s horrendous debate performance. She also had access to the funds raised at that point, which other candidates wouldn’t have had.

98% of the problem was Biden being a stubborn old git, who refused to recognize that he should step back and allow for a primary process. When he didn’t he drastically decreased the chances of a Democrat president.
Those were names that whirled around no? After they chose her the funds raised were a lot more than what Biden had at the time.

Harris was unpopular at the time and it was Hillary all over again only worse. She tried to alienate from Biden as far as she could (which made sense, but not made sense choosing her...).

It was a bit like giving it to Giggsy till the end of the season.

You are right naturally that had Biden stepped earlier they could've chosen a lot better candidate, but still Harris was a huge own goal. I mean Trump winning the popular vote is crazy. Dems made a huge mistake for going with Hillary to Bernie and now it's again one of the worst candidates in their history.
 
She essentially copied Joe's policies and practices; so why were they less inclined to vote for her?
Because Biden has been doing a shite job for the past 4 years? Let’s not pretend the outcome would’ve been different if he was still running.
 
Well, The Undertaker and Kane tombstoned Beyonce and Taylor Swift
 
To be fair, while I agree there is always a degree of hysteria around him, I'm not sure a lot of foreign policy stuff necessarily shows itself straight away. Arguably policies enacted by any individual may end up taking a few years to show their effect.

Domestic policy wise,I can't help but feel he was a disaster, will be a disaster again and his rhetoric is scary.

It’s definitely counterintuitive the way some of our biggest fears about Trump were destabilising the Middle East and emboldening of Putin, only for all of the above to happen with Biden in charge. So maybe you’re onto something about foreign policy causing long delayed aftershocks? I don’t know enough about this stuff to know if that’s true or not.

The only comfort I have this morning is that it feels like everything that could go wrong already has gone wrong, which takes the edge off any acute fears. I do feel very very sad about the consequences for the environment though. That seems to me by far the biggest downside of a Trump victory.
 
No, it's quite clear. Ditch the liberal social justice nonsense and put a handsome white man in his early 50s who can speak confidently and forcefully on economy as a candidate. People voted for Biden because he represented stability, Harris would have been the first female multi racial president- she represents instability and people do not want that.

Trump shows you that you do not lose the "black and latino vote" by being white and racist - he did remarkably well with both groups. Identity politics doesn't seem to be very effective at all among the people who actually vote.

compared to hillary, kamala barely campaigned on her gender. didn't talk much about "first ___". lost even worse. i don't think this was an idpol campaign. this was a promise-nothing, do-nothing, move-to-the-right campaign. premised on the assumption that people want quiet and normalcy above all else, and wanted to see a united political class. didn't want loud politics 24*7. it was the campaign that worked for labour in 2024 - crucially, labour as an opposition party taking on 14-year incumbency in a faltering economy.

it turns out people were willing to have loud partisan politics if immigrants are rounded up and if prices get lowered, because those priorities are higher.
 
Well I'm looking forward to Trumps tariffs hitting the MAGA cultists in the pocket. I'm sure they will just blame the Mexicans but at least they got to own the libs right?
 
This thread is an echo chamber

Anyone raising anything about Trump would be shot down

The signs is all there. People just refused to see it

People had too much faith in the likes of Selzer and Ralston who were supposed to be the "experts" in their states. When the "experts" like Slezer were saying Harris would win Iowa by 3 which would replicate into a landside win for Harris, people just started to think it was game over for Trump.
 
Well I'm looking forward to Trumps tariffs hitting the MAGA cultists in the pocket. I'm sure they will just blame the Mexicans but at least they got to own the libs right?
Oh there'll be plenty of Schadenfreude to go round regarding the MAGA crowd once they realise their livelihoods will be in the shitter. But like you said, they'll believe the strawman of immigration being the cause of their problems, that ghoul Murdoch will be working overtime to ensure that remains the message.
 
I think the honour of waking up Joe and giving him the news should be given to Bibi.
 
Well I'm looking forward to Trumps tariffs hitting the MAGA cultists in the pocket. I'm sure they will just blame the Mexicans but at least they got to own the libs right?

The libs owned the libs.
 
The Dems never actually raise to the occasion imho. They're not even countering the lies and rhetorics. Just kept on playing the they go low we go high bullshit and speaks high valerian about policy and other mumbo jumbo while having no clear policy that you can say it's thanks to them.

Trump speaks boorish but he speaks everyday language. Lock her up, Ima build that wall, as grotesque as it sounds to you that resonates with more voters than "unity and healing"

They dont want healing, the dont want unity, the want to win and watch the other party burn.
I agree but it’s hard to have a serious conversation about policy. Any progressive policy will need some form of investment (tax) and as soon as that word is mentioned every body loses their minds. When you’ve got billionaires, millionaires and even people on good wages, who won’t be impacted by said tax rise, complaining that it’s unfair, what chance have you got.
 
It seems like Trump is winning the popular vote by a considerable margin too. Didn't even Hillary beat him in the popular vote?

Utter lunatic country.
 
Given the repeated failures to poll Donald Trump's electoral results, at this point we have to consider that he's more popular than he appears to be.
I think what we missed is the intensity and its emotional proximity. A lot of people who aren't political junkies or hyper tuned in news consumers will look at his fans and maybe feel a bit annoyed with how loud they are, but they will think at the same time that Trump can't be that bad if he can inspire such adoration and devotion and people, and they are doubly incentivised to think so if those MAGAs are their family, friends, work colleagues etc. So while they dislike him on a personal level and can be polled as such, when push comes to shove that doesn't disqualify him for them. If 10 people around you are constantly saying the deep state was responsible for J6, Trump is being targeted with lawfare etc, how likely is it that you will research it carefully, instead of shrugging it off or buy into the bs? That dynamic showed up in a lot of voter panels, but we don't want to acknowledge it because it is deeply disturbing that what we consider fatal character flaws simply are not to others.
 
People had too much faith in the likes of Selzer and Ralston who were supposed to be the "experts" in their states. When the "experts" like Slezer were saying Harris would win Iowa by 3 which would replicate into a landside win for Harris, people just started to think it was game over for Trump.
Who expected Selzer's poll to be gigantically wrong though.
 
they weren't? he quit in july with months of polls showing him down as much or more in all the states she lost, and he was also losing virginia and NH in some polls (where she has clung on). his approval rating has been sub-40% in all polls including exit polls after the election.

if you're comparing to 2020: covid and trump's handling of it was a big issue, raising questions about his competence, people had disliked having to hear about politics all the time, biden was the most generic politician imaginable, and would presumably fix those issues. in this election, the issues were different - no covid, it was about inflation and immigration. people want to see immigrants in camps, and they want cheaper burgers. they remembered the low inflation and tough rhetoric and actions of trump against migrants, and punished harris (and the biden admin she was part of) for the opposite.

This seems like a very accurate take to me.
 
I do feel very very sad about the consequences for the environment though. That seems to me by far the biggest downside of a Trump victory.
I could not agree more, why more people, especially in the States do not care about this is beyond me. The evidence for climate disaster is so clear and now we have a denier in control for the next 4 years, 4 years that could be the most crucial ever for our planet.
 
I agree but it’s hard to have a serious conversation about policy. Any progressive policy will need some form of investment (tax) and as soon as that word is mentioned every body loses their minds. When you’ve got billionaires, millionaires and even people on good wages, who won’t be impacted by said tax rise, complaining that it’s unfair, what chance have you got.
CF the response to inheritance tax on wealthy farmers here. Most people just aren't very bright. Something the likes of trump appreciate and play to. Instead we'll have months of dems inquisition where the idea that they need to take the maga crowd more seriously, treat them as grown ups etc will be raised. When it's fact it's the opposite.
 
Those were names that whirled around no? After they chose her the funds raised were a lot more than what Biden had at the time.
Yeah, but I still haven't heard how the Democrat apparatus was supposed to choose one over the other at the time. I honestly don't know. I guess Biden maybe could have handpicked one, but that would have seemed like a betrayal of Harris and very odd.
 
Not the news I was hoping to wake up to earlier, far from it...

But America is a very big country and Trump has been elected fair and square.

He must now be held to account from day one, and his inauguration will come around quickly.
 
Yikes… Americans really seem to enjoy being the laughing stock of the world don’t they.
A lot of them will soon laugh at our expense.

The world's going to be the first victim of this car crash of an election.
 
in happier news, i expect my pension and shares portfolio to get a nice boost.
 
Not his biggest fan, far from it, but wish him a speedy inauguration.
 
I can’t believe he is going to win the popular vote too :lol:

Was at least fun reading this thread this morning and seeing the moment everyone’s hopes evaporate, I guess.

We are truly in the worst timeline.
 
If it’s a surprise, then I’m sorry, but it’s from not paying enough attention. Not actually talking to people and picking their brain. There’s a certain level of chauvinism and ignorance to make a sweeping claim that x, y, and z people of color vote against their interests as if to say they don’t have any agency. Gotta do better than that.

This is all true and I would extend this to most of those who vote for Trump. It’s a clear misunderstanding from the Democrats of what nearly half the country wants or cares about.
 
It’s weird. Reading this thread, you’d think people had been doing something much more consequential than posting their lay opinions on the current events section of a football forum. I hadn’t realised the Caf held such an elevated position of political power on the world stage.
 
The death of expertise and the sheer power of perception and vibes. A sad state of affairs but it is what it is.
 
We know the Iowa poll was ridiculous, how off was Selzer in the other swing states?
She's only doing Iowa but it was thought that the same trends would be observed in swing states.
 
Not the news I was hoping to wake up to earlier, far from it...

But America is a very big country and Trump has been elected fair and square.

He must now be held to account from day one, and his inauguration will come around quickly.
Yep he's been overwhelmingly elected, they need to own this for the next 4 years, they chose him.
 
NATO is a 32 member strong organisation. I can tell you there are contingencies in place if USA did decide to pull out but I can also tell you with absolute certainty that it is more likely for the US Army chief of staff to strangle Trump in the situation room with his bare hands and no one trying to stop him rather than USA pulling out of NATO.

I doubt that the US will leave NATO. Whether it will properly support an invasion with active military intervention is a different thing altogether. All I can say is that from what I heard from top quality military people is that Europe is not in shape for a war.
 
a spell of inflation that mostly subsided a year ago is not comparable to 9/11 and war frenzy, especially in a state so tied to new york city. bush ended 2001 at 90% approval.
Trump had a worse approval rating than Harris when the votes were cast yesterday. People voted for Trump not because they liked him, but because they thought he would be better for some reason. Those reasons are what we need to think about. My number one culprit is the economy and inflation. The west is so used to low inflation that when inflation that resembles emerging market happens, they are traumatised.
Inflation has subsided but prices are still way above the benchmark people have in their head, which is when Trump was there.
The fact that he was running again made it an easy comparison to make.
 
It seems like Trump is winning the popular vote by a considerable margin too. Didn't even Hillary beat him in the popular vote?

Utter lunatic country.
She beat him by 2.5m votes. Seems like Trump will beat Harris by 5m+ votes which nobody had predicted. He's probably not going to beat his 74m votes from 2020, but Kamala is going to land so massively below Biden's 81m.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.