- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 11,783
- Supports
- Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
Avram
Ffs, put that in a spoiler, some of us enjoy the horse race
I get you man, you’re looking for someone with coherent ideas, where else would you look other then the source of great oratory and clear concise ideas for the future like this:
In 2020:I'd take a 17th place finish for a Harris romp tomorrow.
I'm not really sure but I think it could be to be honest. 'Overall Trump ended up doing an average amount of harm for a US president' is far from an unheard of take. Then it's just some 'better the devil you know' shit. I could buy those are the real opinions of our guy here.
Nah… not when the evidence is smacking you in the face at how bad your opinion is… it’s like people backing Ten Hag even though he was done.Someone dares to go against the tide here, explaining to us their sincerely held reasoning, and they just get laughed out of the echo chamber.
A moment to reflect upon perhaps.
The election is highly entertaining, but anyone that can't see that the two parties in the US are two cheeks of the same arse is kidding themselves.
There's no turning that country around.
When one of the candidates for the last three elections is a known rapist, pedo, lifelong friend of Jeremy Epstein, etc, etc, etc... Its a very reasonable way to choose isn't it? Saves time thinking about other considerations.I get what she means, but it is kind of a weird way to pick a President.
Would you pick your hairdresser, plumber or accountant in the same way?
The whole post is being laughed at because it is full of lies and makes no sense. All the post does is slag of Harris without a single reason for voting Trump other than she isn't Harris. It fails to mention a single Trump policy that the poster is voting for. Harris is not giving the impression she is leadership material, WTF is Trump giving an impression of? It deserves to be laughed at.
Nah… not when the evidence is smacking you in the face at how bad your opinion is… it’s like people backing Ten Hag even though he was done.
I don't think it's absurd. Neither are going to do anything about the crisis in the Middle East, neither are going to do anything about the huge societal issues domestically. Both are too self-serving.The democrats are a million miles away from being particularly good but it’s absurd to suggest both parties are as bad as each other.
Is the domestic argument true though? Don't the Republicans constantly try to block things?I don't think it's absurd. Neither are going to do anything about the crisis in the Middle East, neither are going to do anything about the huge societal issues domestically. Both are too self-serving.
Harris landside incoming
What lies are you talking about? There are barely any claims there, mostly personal impressions.
It's a dishonest headline, his lawyers confessed it court that it was basically a scam and the 'winners' are pre vetted campaign stooges to influence people to vote a certain way. So since the winners aren't randomly chosen, that wasn't a sweepstake and hence not in violation of PA gambling laws.
No-one really knows.PA decides it, doesn't it?
I don't think it's absurd. Neither are going to do anything about the crisis in the Middle East, neither are going to do anything about the huge societal issues domestically. Both are too self-serving.
Is this NH or MD? Hard to believe that it would be this big of a gap in NH.
I don't think it's absurd. Neither are going to do anything about the crisis in the Middle East, neither are going to do anything about the huge societal issues domestically. Both are too self-serving.
Harris is not giving an impression she’s leadership material. And this guy thinks Trump is compared to her?
The Trump term wasn’t as apocalyptic as first feared, try telling that to every one who lost a family member because he mismanaged Covid.
The prospect of her scares me more than Trump. Really?
Impressions or not, the post is full of shite.
The lawsuit was about whether they violated PA gambling laws. If you want to nail him on campaign violation stuff you have to bring a different suit.Is it not a violation of electoral law?
Surely you can’t try to influence voting by pretending to put a million dollars up for grabs to those who vote the way you want?
I know, but these are Maryland and California numbers… unbelievable poll, but I can’t see this happening.Its New Hampshire. The landside is coming
The lawsuit was about whether they violated PA gambling laws. If you want to nail him on campaign violation stuff you have to bring a different suit.
I am questioning why he thinks she isn’t leadership material but a madman who told people to drink bleach is?Are you claiming that Fener does think Harris is leadership material, but is lying and pretending the opposite? Instead of the infinitely more likely explanation of someone simply disagreeing with you about her ability to lead?
This thread is so nuts.
I am questioning why he thinks she isn’t leadership material but a madman who told people to drink bleach is?
He put a whole post of not voting for Harris then failed to list a single reason as to why he is voting for Trump. Perhaps he can come back and answer the questions but I suspect he is just a WUM.
I literally listed the lies in my post. Do you think the Trump term was not apocalyptic as first feared? I’m responding but you seem to be ignoring what I’m saying.No, you're not questioning, you called someone out as a liar, yet seem totally incapable of explaining why or how.
Did you lie about lying?
One is looking to give oil companies carte blanche and pull the US out of the Paris Agreement
One is more likely to let Putin have his way and embolden Russia’s creeping imperialism.
One is in bed with people who are tied to the Heritage Foundation’s project which… I can’t even summarize the horrors that would ensue if that were implemented.
The Dems are shit but this false equivalence nonsense is absolute idiocy.