Let's give it a rest for the day with the Sanders, Warren etc. stuff?
The orange one is losing to sleepy grandpa. It's 2 pm on a wednesday and i'm dancing to
it's been 78% in favour of Biden so far so it's actually very likely he will make up the ground.I cant see Biden making up enough ground to win PA. There are what, 1.5m votes outstanding? And Trump has a 600k lead. Thats too much, for me.
There are enough potential votes, based on what's been seen. May not be enough, but no reason to rule it out at the moment.I cant see Biden making up enough ground to win PA. There are what, 1.5m votes outstanding? And Trump has a 600k lead. Thats too much, for me.
I cant see Biden making up enough ground to win PA. There are what, 1.5m votes outstanding? And Trump has a 600k lead. Thats too much, for me.
1.4 million. So he needs more than 1 million of them. Tough but doable considering it's all mail-in.I cant see Biden making up enough ground to win PA. There are what, 1.5m votes outstanding? And Trump has a 600k lead. Thats too much, for me.
I agree. Trump got PA in the bag. The Steel industry might be a big factor as to why that is.
it's been 78% in favour of Biden so far so it's actually very likely he will make up the ground.
I cant see Biden making up enough ground to win PA. There are what, 1.5m votes outstanding? And Trump has a 600k lead. Thats too much, for me.
Is this actually likely and based on facts, or is it a dream scenario? Hoping for the first of course, but after the polls misery I don't trust anything at this point.Mail vote has won Wisconsin for biden. Mail vote is likey to win Michigan and Pennsylvania for biden
what is going on in Michigan? it turned red again? wasnt it blue a few minutes ago
i'm watching CNN
With the $500m + in bets on this election, I would have assumed that it would have been worth it to create a more comprehensive model that would take into account the precincts(urban/rural) that still had not sent in their results and the % of absentee votes not registered, assuming this data was available, which is dependent on man power. Not easy, but if the weighing of the variables are correct, it is just a matter of data/lack of data --> data gathering.
I’m feeling the smugness rising within. @Kentonio must be too
It is quite possible that Sanders would have won popular vote, and in big states like California, more Dems would have voted him. But in the end, that does not matter.I think we're setting the bar low here. Remember John Delaney? Or Howard Schultz? They would have won the popular vote by a good amount. I think that was the metric @Siorac was using to dictate enthusiasm, and I can argue that a more left candidate would have picked up a disillusioned voter for every center right voter that was lost to Trump.
That said, the need to align to a more centrist lane is dictated by the EC, and the way the senate races are going, it looks like that approach isn't getting the complete validation it set out to get. I will give 100% credit to Biden for doing what Hillary did not: stump across the Midwest, and engage the left wing of the party.
The 1.4m votes left to count are heavy democrat counties with mail votes (which also lean toward democrat votes). I would not rule PA out for Biden at all.I agree. Trump got PA in the bag. The Steel industry might be a big factor as to why that is.
It will be much needed.
Some generally very sensible posters lost their collective shit on here in the small hours of last night, just because exactly what they had been told was going to happen, happened.
In an ideal world, I'd want people with genuine left-wing beliefs to run the Democratic Party. What I'm not convinced is there's a massive amount of potential voter left, well, anywhere. A turnout approaching 70% is generally about the limit of what you usually see in any country that doesn't have mandatory elections. There's always around 30% of any electorate that can't be bothered to vote. What Biden achieved is, in my opinion, close to the limit.I think we're setting the bar low here. Remember John Delaney? Or Howard Schultz? They would have won the popular vote by a good amount. I think that was the metric @Siorac was using to dictate enthusiasm, and I can argue that a more left candidate would have picked up a disillusioned voter for every center right voter that was lost to Trump.
That said, the need to align to a more centrist lane is dictated by the EC, and the way the senate races are going, it looks like that approach isn't getting the complete validation it set out to get. I will give 100% credit to Biden for doing what Hillary did not: stump across the Midwest, and engage the left wing of the party.
He absolutely does not have PA in the bag
They are mail votes though, he needs something like 72-74% of them to win the state. So far, he has been winning 78% of mail votes.I cant see Biden making up enough ground to win PA. There are what, 1.5m votes outstanding? And Trump has a 600k lead. Thats too much, for me.
The 1.4m votes left to count are heavy democrat counties with mail votes (which also lean toward democrat votes). I would not rule PA out for Biden at all.
Disagree. He's more popular there than some realise he is. Him standing up for US steel won him a lot of voters there.
Anyone that voted for Trump is either a racist/sexist/etc and voted for him for those reasons, or they are not racist/sexist/etc directly themselves but have no problem that Trump is. Those are the only two options...
Why don't they just call it then?
Oh twitter is glorious is right now.
If Biden takes PA, then he almost certainly takes MI too. And well, he actually doesn’t need MI in that scenario.Hope you are right. If Biden takes PA then its difficult to see a route to 270 for Trump.
I'm not even saying Biden will definitely win. Trump could still win it but we don't know that yet.
But Trump absolutely doesn't have PA in the bag, he simply doesn't .
Likely Biden bags Michigan and Wisconsin. PA is in the balance, a heavy number (1.4m) yet to be counted, can Biden catch up from 600k behind? It's possible! A lot of these will be heavily democrat favoured.Is this actually likely and based on facts, or is it a dream scenario? Hoping for the first of course, but after the polls misery I don't trust anything at this point.
I think that he actually may have won Arizona, with the hispanic vote and Michigan or WisconsinIt is quite possible that Sanders would have won popular vote, and in big states like California, more Dems would have voted him. But in the end, that does not matter.
So far, Maine is the only senate race that has gone wrong. N Carolina (despite Dems leading in polls for senate) was hard to be won if Trump won the state (which he was predicted to won based on polls). Thing is, people seem to vote a straight ticket nowadays.
Maine is a bit absurd, no clue what happened there. Collins was supposed to be very unpopular, and Trump attacked her on Twitter just a few days ago. Yet it seems that she walked it.