Oh dear. Raoul does not like me.
EDIT:
No need to shout now.
If you knew Fontaine you would know it was very much needed
Oh dear. Raoul does not like me.
EDIT:
No need to shout now.
If you knew Fontaine you would know it was very much needed
This is pretty much exactly what you told us would happen with Trump.
There may be a difference in possibilities, though. I have a hunch a right wing populist government can run on ideological fuel in a way a left wing one can't. I'd expect someone like Sanders to be more dependent on tangible results and improvements, while someone like Trump can still feed his base with symbolic crowd-pleasers while messing up. The latter can easier be achieved without political compromises that limit one's agenda, because practical failure isn't as much of a show stopper.That's one way to see it. Seemingly the Biden view, "once Trump is gone everything will go back to normal."
Another way to see it might be that there is a growing trend of people being bored to death and disillusioned with standard liberal politics, and as a result there is an increased polarization by which more radical, extremist politics can hope to succeed.
There may be a difference in possibilities, though. I have a hunch a right wing populist government can run on ideological fuel in a way a left wing one can't. I'd expect someone like Sanders to be more dependent on tangible results and improvements, while someone like Trump can still feed his base with symbolic crowd-pleasers while messing up. The latter can easier be achieved without political compromises that limit one's agenda, because practical failure isn't as much of a show stopper.
Apart from my general dislike of populism, that's one of the reasons why I'm hugely sceptical about the recent enthusiasm for LW populism. Although I readily admit I haven't paid closer attention to the political concepts involved so far.
He needs to be crushed asap, even fecking Tom Perez might see the risk of him.
if he wants his party to sruvive medium-term, i think he should look into itHe is leading everyone by a country mile, so I doubt Perez would be interested in hurting his leading contender.
Its almost like hes trying to lose
Its almost like hes trying to lose
He probably thinks he’s going to get Democrat votes regardless because he’s not Trump so he might as well target the Libertarians and moderate Conservative Republicans who would settle for a right wing democrat to get Trump out of their party.
He probably thinks he’s going to get Democrat votes regardless because he’s not Trump so he might as well target the Libertarians and moderate Conservative Republicans who would settle for a right wing democrat to get Trump out of their party.
Digging up quotes from 40 years ago is proof he is trying to lose ?
More like proof he is going to win
He probably thinks he’s going to get Democrat votes regardless because he’s not Trump so he might as well target the Libertarians and moderate Conservative Republicans who would settle for a right wing democrat to get Trump out of their party.
He probably thinks he’s going to get Democrat votes regardless because he’s not Trump so he might as well target the Libertarians and moderate Conservative Republicans who would settle for a right wing democrat to get Trump out of their party.
Digging up quotes from 40 years ago is proof he is trying to lose ?
More like proof he is going to win
But he's saying the exact same things now he was same 40 years ago. His ideology and outlook hasn't changed.
He'll probably win but he'll struggle to achieve much as President because he fundamentally doesn't seem to understand how power works and how the Republican Party operate.
His 2024 campaign will be for access to affordable cancer cures
There may be a difference in possibilities, though. I have a hunch a right wing populist government can run on ideological fuel in a way a left wing one can't. I'd expect someone like Sanders to be more dependent on tangible results and improvements, while someone like Trump can still feed his base with symbolic crowd-pleasers while messing up. The latter can easier be achieved without political compromises that limit one's agenda, because practical failure isn't as much of a show stopper.
Apart from my general dislike of populism, that's one of the reasons why I'm hugely sceptical about the recent enthusiasm for LW populism. Although I readily admit I haven't paid closer attention to the political concepts involved so far.