This is so over the top that's it's essentially farce.
I take it you disagree then.
This is so over the top that's it's essentially farce.
Warren can win over soccer moms, brilliant! The issue is that Warren can't win over or help organise the one group of people she needs to ''make capitalism work for everyone'' - the american working class. Without this group meaningful reforms are impossible, so it's going to be a wasted 4 years.Warren's views on foreign policy and her ability to generally take a more pragmatic approach instead of constantly harping about the "millionaires, billionaires, and zillionaires".. will actually help her tap into Dems who view Sanders as too old, too ranty, and too anti-capitalist. There are a ton of independents up for grabs who would be amenable to Warren's message of making capitalism work for everyone, as opposed to feeling like they are promoting socialism in America, which is what Sanders is synonymous with. Also, there's no one in the field has the degree of policy depth that Warren has, which will (imo) set her apart during and after the debates next month.
Warren can win over soccer moms, brilliant! The issue is that Warren can't win over or help organise the one group of people she needs to ''make capitalism work for everyone'' - the american working class. Without this group meaningful reforms are impossible, so it's going to be a wasted 4 years.
The so called working class aren't politically monolithic and vote on only one issue. Trump lulled many of them over to the GOP last cycle, so its fair to say they come from a fairly disparate set of political views and can vote for literally anyone who speaks to each individual voter's needs. In this sense, Warren and Sanders are generally in the same category. Anti-corporation, anti-corruption, reduced defense, pro-climate change policies, anti-Nafta 2.0, pro-union, rebuilding the middle class etc etc. There is very little between them that your average voter would look at and say that they are voting for one over the other.
I take it you disagree then.
Trump lulled some stupid old white workers, the story of 2016 is Clinton failing to get working class people to vote for her. The turnout in 2016 was awful and shouldn't be used a representation of really anything.The so called working class aren't politically monolithic and vote on only one issue. Trump lulled many of them over to the GOP last cycle, so its fair to say they come from a fairly disparate set of political views and can vote for literally anyone who speaks to each individual voter's needs.
Universal Healthcare ?In this sense, Warren and Sanders are generally in the same category. Anti-corporation, anti-corruption, reduced defense, pro-climate change policies, anti-Nafta 2.0, pro-union, rebuilding the middle class etc etc. There is very little between them that your average voter would look at and say that they are voting for one over the other.
Trump lulled some stupid old white workers, the story of 2016 is Clinton failing to get working class people to vote for her. The turnout in 2016 was awful and shouldn't be used a representation of really anything.
Universal Healthcare ?
But all this is beside the point. Again Warren thinks you can get reforms without the need of working class pressure. So when her plans fail due the republicans and dems not moving she is fecked, she hasn't got any alternative answer to get reforms.
No because Sander believes the way you push forward policy is through working class movements/protests(Bernie literally says this at his rallies). Would this work who knows but it is a actual alternative. Warren doesn't have this.Same can be applied to Sanders as well as anyone else. The GOP will likely still control the Senate so most policies would get blocked.
No because Sander believes the way you push forward policy is through working class movements/protests(Bernie literally says this at his rallies). Would this work who knows but it is a actual alternative. Warren doesn't have this.
@Raoul the so called cult of Bernie is not necessarily a bad thing. Should he win the presidency, it could a actually be good that he has a lot of passionate followers who are likely to stay engaged and get into the ears of their local reps.
it's highly likely that Sanders would diverge from what he is running on once he gets into office. Presidents almost always run on a form aspirational idealism only to quickly moderate to pragmatism once they are in office. They are introduced to information and intelligence that forces them to drift towards more conservative policies than what they ran on and Sanders would almost surely disappoint his flock by doing the same..
At this is where the movement would come in. Sander has said he would go to the state of Senators(Including Democrats)who are stopping medicare for all.That's fine but you can't "push forward policy" without the US Senate cooperating, and until the Dems reclaim the Senate with enough left leaning Senators who actually buy into Sanders style politics, there will be no movement. Medicare for all, Green New Deal, all the other aspirational policies will be dead in the water.
This is pretty much exactly what you told us would happen with Trump.
At this is where the movement would come in. Sander has said he would go to the state of Senators(Including Democrats)who are stopping medicare for all.
Just today Sanders was marching with workers
There could be mass strike to force through policies like medicare for all and a green new deal. Yes this is all pie in the sky stuff but its more than Warren has.
Trump is clearly an outlier in just about every way imaginable.
That's one way to see it. Seemingly the Biden view, "once Trump is gone everything will go back to normal."
Another way to see it might be that there is a growing trend of people being bored to death and disillusioned with standard liberal politics, and as a result there is an increased polarization by which more radical, extremist politics can hope to succeed.
If that were true then I would imagine it would be reflected in the polling during this year's primaries. The fact that so many people are banking on Biden suggests they want to return to some degree of normalcy over the sort of systemic change that the likes of Sanders are pushing. If on the other hand, either of Sanders or Warren win then it would be a sign that the country is moving more in that direction.
It's June 2019, long way to go. I'll be shocked if Biden is President in 2021. Then again, I'll be surprised if Trump isn't.
It's June 2019, long way to go. I'll be shocked if Biden is President in 2021. Then again, I'll be surprised if Trump isn't.
That's one way to see it. Seemingly the Biden view, "once Trump is gone everything will go back to normal."
Another way to see it might be that there is a growing trend of people being bored to death and disillusioned with standard liberal politics, and as a result there is an increased polarization by which more radical, extremist politics can hope to succeed.
Forget Biden, he’ll be out of it. Focus on others.Bernie is simply addressing the main concerns of people.
Universal Health Care and Climate Change.
I suppose you can call those who want these fundamental things cultist followers. pretty lame actually.
And bringing up the age old capitalism and Socialism words is worse. Newsflash. Those who are concerned about such things are the braindeads who were never going to vote for him anyway.
How do you think Capitalism has been treating people?
Yeah right. And the proven alternative who can 'win'??
Joe Biden
Lets examine his two major policy roll outs.
Climate Change.
His advisers simply plagiarized others and came up with a time line that defeats the purpose of implementing such a policy.
The critical time line is 12 years. Not 50. Talk about slamming the barn door shut after the horses have bolted.
Or Biden knows he is going to croak it and does not give a shit.
Hyde Amendment.
You could not make it up.
After decades supporting it he suddenly has a err Epiphany. woo hoo.
Now he is all concerned about Roe v Wade.
Now his 'cultist' corporate overlords may think this will convince people.
I doubt though that people who have some critical thinking will buy it.
ahhh. peleasee.
Must try harder.
I've already answered this.You'd still need control of the legislative bodies to move policy, and as we've seen, McConnell controls that for now and could care less if certain groups are demonstrating.
Forget Biden, he’ll be out of it. Focus on others.
I believe the large field is a DNC strategy to distract. Otherwise people will be focused on the huge differences between Bernie and Biden.
I hope Warren is not being used by the DNC to dilute Bernie support. Remember Nina Turner attacking her last cycle.
It very much feels like Bernie or Bust to me.
One way to see if the others are mere fodder is see if they will attack Biden for his obvious hypocrisy.
The crooked corporatist DNC are plotting to ruin it again are they ? Remarkable how they've managed to recruit so many people to run just to thwart Bernie.
Just when you thought Fontaine was no longer with us...
I believe the large field is a DNC strategy to distract. Otherwise people will be focused on the huge differences between Bernie and Biden.
I hope Warren is not being used by the DNC to dilute Bernie support. Remember Nina Turner attacking her last cycle.
It very much feels like Bernie or Bust to me.
One way to see if the others are mere fodder is see if they will attack Biden for his obvious hypocrisy.
who is Fontaine ?
A GOOD POSTER BUT A DIFFICULT PERSONALITY