- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,225
Turtleface is correct about the public option. It would quickly end private health insurance.
Turtleface is correct about the public option. It would quickly end private health insurance.
He did say that it would because it's cheaper though.
Right. He's basically admitted that the government plan would be cheaper which in effect would mean the insurance industry would go away.
But private health insurance still exists in Europe, Canada and Australia and Japan. It won't go away but will just be much reduced and focused on niches that aren't as efficient in massive health systems (for instance things like MRIs will still have a big market for paying customers that don't want to wait and I'm sure the selfish in Congress will figure out a way to keep their luxury private health insurance that is subsidized by the taxpayers.
Of course but Public option isn't seen like that in the USA. They see that as the government selling insurance plans which of course would mean the majority would go yo them for a cheaper option. What the disingenuous feck doesn't admit is that UHC would give it to everyone for free with no insurance needed at all and that people who could afford it would pay for private care. The only trouble is you can guarantee private insurance would go insane so ironically would be unfair to those that chose it. But the point still stands that his one sided, selfish opinion is still the one that counts the most.
How does it work in the UK (I think you are UK) or any other European country you are familiar with?
What about for MRIs? For instance I wasn't thinking about private insurance in every case but just paying out of pocket for an MRI that is done within days as opposed to waiting months?
Honestly I don't know. I've had 5 MRI's in 4 years and 2 were scheduled and yes there was a bit of a wait, but it wasn't urgent so I wasn't bothered. I can't comment on private as I haven't got it. What I can say though is the UK is a bad example to use atm as the Tories are doing their best to destroy the NHS (and many other things like the Police Force) because they want to eventually have the same insurance system the US has because they don't want us all to have access to healthcare when they could be making money from it at the same time as they hate the fact poor people benefit without contributing towards it.
That's a bit depressing to be honest. I remember about 10 years ago reading a breakdown on some forum that broke things down and concluded that Australia would be a much better model for the US to follow than UK (and I think he mentioned a few other European countries like France as well)
Biden is Trump lite.
When the debates start, people's eyes will be opened.
How often have we heard about 12 years being critical for Climate Change. Yet this guy is cavalier about it all.
If that's Sanders' approach then it wont move the needle at all. He needs to stick to policy differences instead of churlish class warfare stuff.
Climate Change is serious as is health Care.
Those and other policies are what Bernie is running on.
It is my opinion about Biden being Trump lite. Think many would agree.
I doubt many would agree since Biden is broadly viewed as the guy who could actually rid us of Trump. He's obviously not a progressive by any stretch but to label him as Trump light is obviously well off the mark when you consider what Trump brings to the table.
The fact he is obviously not mental like Trump is unimportant.
He will do little to advance any Democratic causes.
He wont rock the boat for sure.
EDIT:
Importantly he does not believe in anything.
But the outcome was Trump and the Republicans wining every level of government in 2016, right ?I'd imagine his policies will be roughly in the same ball park as Obama's, which received fairly broad support in the 8 years preceding Trump.
But the outcome was Trump, right ?
I'd imagine his policies will be roughly in the same ball park as Obama's, which received fairly broad support in the 8 years preceding Trump.
I completely disagree(Inequality went up under Obama, The democratic party lost all electoral gains it made in 2008 part from the presidency, the Flint mess etc) with that but lets say you are correct then Obama policies were completely useless at changing the state of the country. If a few individuals can change the outcome of the politics of the most powerful country then what the hell was Obama doing for 8 years ?He wasn't an outcome of Obama, he was an outcome of a perfect storm of stupidity from a variety of disparate sources ranging from Clinton, to the rise of the Tea Party, to Comey, to Russian influence etc.
I completely disagree(Inequality went up under Obama, The democratic party lost all electoral gains it made in 2008 part from the presidency, the Flint mess etc) with that but lets say you are correct then Obama policies were completely useless at changing the state of the country. If a few individuals can change the outcome of the politics of the most powerful country then what the hell was Obama doing for 8 years ?
Although I think your view is the majority view held by democratic voters. That Trump popped up out of well rather large air and isn't the result of decades of awful policy. Which sucks because as someone who lives in a country which free healthcare, its pretty dam great.
FDR took over near the top of the spike in 1933
By 1941 (end of his second term) inequality was in a serious downward trend, well below pre-FDR levels. For reference, Obama-era numbers don't improve from where this graph cuts off.
I want to see a Trump/Putin 2020 sign.
Agree.It's going to take longer term structural policy changes across multiple administrations (at least) to accomplish that.
Agree.
The worrying thing is both party core voting base have no actual intension of fixing this, let alone the high up figures in the parties. The dem leadership race this year really comes down to - Do You Want 08 Nostalgia Or A Chance At Healthcare ? While there is lot of time left, its worrying for any longer term change that Biden is polling so high and someone like Warren is almost getting nothing.
And the rest of american is left every four years with two choices that don't improve the current situation at all. Its bleak.
Sanders currently leads Biden among 18-29 year old voters, by an impressive 41% to 11%. However, Sanders’ support weakens with age: 30-49 year olds only break for Sanders 29% to 26%, as compared to 50-64 year olds who break for Biden 42% to 19%. Among those over 65, Biden has a strong lead, beating Sanders 52% to 7%.
Fox News viewers are more likely to back Sen. Bernie Sanders than people who tend to watch MSNBC, according to a new Morning Consult poll.
The poll found that 22% of Fox News viewers who also identified as potential Democratic primary voters back Sanders compared to just 13% of MSNBC viewers.
Sanders was an outlier in this regard, as every other 2020 Democratic included in the poll had more support among MSNBC viewers than those who tend to watch Fox News.
The only candidate with more support among Fox News viewers than Sanders was Joe Biden (42%), but the former vice president also had more support among MSNBC viewers overall (44%).