Real systemic change can't happen by electing just a President. It will take both a President and Congress to be not just of the same party but rigidly committed to changing the system. We are pretty far away from that at the moment since neither the House or Senate are anywhere near that sort of galvanized state.
Has anything along these lines happen during your lifetime?
Nope. The US system isn't setup for this sort of thing, even less so in an era where a group of overlapping political tribes are constantly pulling against one another. That's not to say its impossible in the future, but the likeliest of scenarios is gradual, incremental change. If the Dems get an amenable President and 60% in both houses then things could happen fairly quickly, although right now we are pretty far off from that.
Thought we were over this reaching out to the Republicans bullshit after 2016.
Biden vs Bernie would be Clinton vs Bernie all over again, as far as divisions in Demand party is concerned. Obama would probably campaign a lot of Biden too which will really open fault lines within the party.
Don't think it will happen with the electoral college system.
Not really, he has great approval rating amongst the deplorables.Is there a chance for Drump getting primaried?
Is there a chance for Drump getting primaried?
Noone in trumpistan would care if he shoots a guy in NYC.If he walks down 5th Avenue and shoots someone.
If he did... When would that startIs there a chance for Drump getting primaried?
Is there a chance for Drump getting primaried?
Nope. The US system isn't setup for this sort of thing, even less so in an era where a group of overlapping political tribes are constantly pulling against one another. That's not to say its impossible in the future, but the likeliest of scenarios is gradual, incremental change. If the Dems get an amenable President and 60% in both houses then things could happen fairly quickly, although right now we are pretty far off from that.
Gradual incremental change will never work for us. It’ll only excacerbate the issues while offering short term solutions without fundamentally addressing the issues at hand.
Democrats need to be careful not to run solely as the anti trump. Biden is the most suseptable of all the candidates to fall in to this trap. When trump spouts his bullshit the dem candidates must counter with facts and a clear plan instead of a group hug and collective dick sucking on how we are better than that. They need to fight back and show up so that struggling people in red and purple states pay attention.I probably would have voted for Biden in 2016.
But now he is a no vote for me.
Democrats need to be careful not to run solely as the anti trump. Biden is the most suseptable of all the candidates to fall in to this trap. When trump spouts his bullshit the dem candidates must counter with facts and a clear plan instead of a group hug and collective dick sucking on how we are better than that. They need to fight back and show up so that struggling people in red and purple states pay attention.
If trump goes low just spend the day on media talking about his relationship with the Russian mob. Better yet, find the multiple people that trump has screwed over and turn them in to Joe the plumbers.
Make Flint the issue and not your native American heritage. Bring champions of social democracy from other countries to town halls to talk about the benefits instead of allowing the label to be used as mud to throw at you.
If the Dems allow this guy to even get close to a 2nd term they have utterly failed in their lives and I hope history spits at their cowardice.
Sorry but I hate your friend.So this was a rant posted by a friend on Facebook:
"To all you supporters of Bernie Sanders,
A PSA...
We non-Trump supporters have an abundance of candidates to choose from in the upcoming primary. Each is eminently more qualified than Trump. Each will instill dignity back into the office. Each will bring with them liberal to progressive policies that will steer this country back to one which reflects individuals and groups as humans worthy of respect, equality, and an honest chance at leading successful, healthy lives. I'd be happy to have any of them in the White House and many of them I've been very happy to hear announce.
The only ones I haven't been thrilled with have been those I don't know well or Bernie Sanders, a senator I caucused for last presidential primary.
Why? Because it was his supporters, you or your compatriots, before he even announced he was running, that have been attacking the entire field. feck that. It's hard to get up excitement, let alone support, for someone whose vocal supporters are the worst mix of low-key passive aggressive patriarchy, misogyny, and racism all the while flaunting their and their candidate's progressive values.
I'm struggling to divorce them from him but it is a herculean trial.
Consider this the next time you feel the need to "criticize" another candidate rather than praise Sanders' record and proposals, that someone who was all in on Sanders in 2016 can't even muster an emotion more positive than apathy for him because of the actions and statements of a very vocal branch of adherents.
What can you do to counter them? Counter them. Point out that their tactics and language are divisive. Point out the inaccuracies of their attacks on other candidates (and yes most of the ones I've seen have been inaccurate, and yes, this means you'll probably need to do some research into the record of those candidates but isn't an informed vote what you want to cast?). Bring up their stated policies and platforms for THIS campaign and what you think they can bring to the table and then why you still choose Sanders. This is FAR more persuasive, though it may not be as viscerally satisfying as indulging in our baser instincts as slinging mud.
Let's flood this primary with so much positivity and unification that there is no place for the Russians or the GOP to go for their whisper campaigns and electoral shenanigans.
Let's do better. Let's be better."
I don't agree with the lad that posted this at all btw
I know it's a way out but Sanders Harris and beto seem to be the most likley people to face trump.
Cant help but think that trump would fancy the match up against "crazy" Bernie Sanders rather than the other other two
Beto to the left of Biden? Beto's voting would suggest otherwise surely?If Biden runs it will likely come at the expense of Harris, which would make it a three horse race between (from left to center) Bernie, Beto, and Biden .
Beto to the left of Biden? Beto's voting would suggest otherwise surely?
although not as far left as Sanders.
His voting record is mixed, and rather short. Voting to end an oil export ban that had outlived its usefulness doesn’t make him a closet Republican.Beto to the left of Biden? Beto's voting would suggest otherwise surely?
You really didn't need to even say that. He's not anywhere near as left as Sanders.
Based on what he's both said and done, he's probably to the left of Biden, but not by much. He's essentially one of the most moderate candidates.
I don't think there's much danger of Beto taking votes from Bernie. The only time I'd see that becoming an actual issue is if he starts getting enough votes where he's actually winning. Otherwise he's going to take votes from most other candidates before Bernie.
I definitely think Biden and Beto are running roughly in the same lane. Not necessarily policy wise, but as you say Biden has a strong connection to Obama, which is the image Beto no doubt wants to run on himself.
Klobuchar and Gillibrand are attacked as well and no one is afraid of losing to them.If you want to know who is concerned about taking votes from who then just look at who is attacking who. The bulk of the early attacks on O'Rourke are coming from Sanders and Trump supporters and not from anywhere near the political center.