Charlie Foley
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,385
What about her chance of winning tomorrow, that's the important one.
What about her chance of winning tomorrow, that's the important one.
It's not likely he'll win, but to dismiss his chances altogether would be foolish. He's able to galvanise his supporter base alot more than Hillary can, and let's be honest, many progressives are voting for her reluctantly, if at all. This sort of apathy and complaceny is always dangerous, especially if Brexit is anything to go by.It's a lot closer than it should be, you're right. But it still is a cake walk for the dems, it's nowhere near close. There is no indication at all that there is any danger of Trump winning bar a complete surprise that nobody has seen coming.
Perhaps, but Bernie has way less skeletons in his closet then Hillary; not to mention he would have run circles around Trump in the debates.
It's not likely he'll win, but to dismiss his chances altogether would be foolish. He's able to galvanise his supporter base alot more than Hillary can, and let's be honest, many progressives are voting for her reluctantly, if at all. This sort of apathy and complaceny is always dangerous, especially if Brexit is anything to go by.
And for those who said Clinton's run a substance-free campaign
Maybe 'don't let him win' is just about the only thing that can cut through the bullshit?
A random video I stumbled upon:
It's a very well made video but filled with alot of hyperbolic nonsense. She talks passionately about protecting children and those vulnerable in society, yet unsurprisingly no mention of how she defended a child rapist in the 70s.
A random video I stumbled upon:
The Democratic convention itself wasn't much better. They set the tone, aided/forced by Trump, and the media, again, aided/forced by Trump, has followed.
Did Trump out perform the polls in the primaries ?
Cheers. That's a relief.Nope. Underperformed if anything.
His largest base of support, non-college white men, while a formidable voting bloc as a whole, isn't exactly known for their participation rate.
The Democratic convention itself wasn't much better. They set the tone, aided/forced by Trump, and the media, again, aided/forced by Trump, has followed.
This makes no sense. They set the tone because Donald made them. So...Donald set the tone. The republicans set their stall out in the train wreck they called a primary. Compare that to the democratic primary.
This isn't entirely directed at you but...This "they're as bad as each other" nonsense has to stop. A kid getting C-s isn't the same as a kid failing right across the board. It's just an excuse for people so they don't have to learn more, or educate themselves about politics.
So would losing NC sink him regardless of the other swings, same as Florida? I can't run the numbers just yet...
No words.
Lol.
Donald Trump isn't pulling the DNC's strings. As @InfiniteBoredom pointed out, they probably focus-grouped this and found that Clinton v Trump is better if they focus on his personality rather than her policies.
Contrast the speeches by Bernie and maybe Warren on one side and everyone else, but especially the much-praised stuff from Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama on the other. There is a strong case to be made against Trump's promised economic policies. But Hillary does better when focusing on his persona.
North Carolina, Florida and Nevada are still blue in their latest forecasting. And Hillary can lose all three of them (quite unlikely IMO) and still win the election as long as she wins New Hampshire (+2.9 at the moment).538 is raising chances for Dump while everybody else is doing the opposite. I am slightly nervous.
They are crunching in new polls, that were not available when I made that post.North Carolina, Florida and Nevada are still blue in their latest forecasting. And Hillary can lose all three of them (quite unlikely IMO) and still win the election as long as she wins New Hampshire (+2.9 at the moment).