2016 US Presidential Elections | Trump Wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a lot closer than it should be, you're right. But it still is a cake walk for the dems, it's nowhere near close. There is no indication at all that there is any danger of Trump winning bar a complete surprise that nobody has seen coming.
It's not likely he'll win, but to dismiss his chances altogether would be foolish. He's able to galvanise his supporter base alot more than Hillary can, and let's be honest, many progressives are voting for her reluctantly, if at all. This sort of apathy and complaceny is always dangerous, especially if Brexit is anything to go by.
 
Perhaps, but Bernie has way less skeletons in his closet then Hillary; not to mention he would have run circles around Trump in the debates.

You presume that the debates would've been about policy. For all we know Trump would've branded Bernie a KGB operative who honeymooned in Moscow.
 
It's not likely he'll win, but to dismiss his chances altogether would be foolish. He's able to galvanise his supporter base alot more than Hillary can, and let's be honest, many progressives are voting for her reluctantly, if at all. This sort of apathy and complaceny is always dangerous, especially if Brexit is anything to go by.

I'm not dismissing his chances altogether, but the statement that you made exaggerated his chances. The dems could only be in danger if his chances to win were likely. If it's not likely that he will win then the dems are not in danger, bar a random surprise that nobody could have predicted coming. The comparisons to Brexit have been debunked over and over, it's not the same.
 
And for those who said Clinton's run a substance-free campaign



Maybe 'don't let him win' is just about the only thing that can cut through the bullshit?
 


Looks good for her...realistically he's got to win those three light blue ones, and even though he's still got a decent chance in them all individually it'd be a surprise at this point if they all go his way.
 
And for those who said Clinton's run a substance-free campaign



Maybe 'don't let him win' is just about the only thing that can cut through the bullshit?


The Democratic convention itself wasn't much better. They set the tone, aided/forced by Trump, and the media, again, aided/forced by Trump, has followed.
 
I want Ohio! Let him lose in a bigger landslide than the Mittens, then we dig up that 'choked like a dog' tweet and throw it at him.
 
It's a very well made video but filled with alot of hyperbolic nonsense. She talks passionately about protecting children and those vulnerable in society, yet unsurprisingly no mention of how she defended a child rapist in the 70s.

And you voted for Sanders? Feck!
 
The Democratic convention itself wasn't much better. They set the tone, aided/forced by Trump, and the media, again, aided/forced by Trump, has followed.

I expressed plenty of misgivings about it at the time, especially on day 4 when it's American exceptionalism porn, but it's clear the networks - at the very least - have no interest in digging into issues, which influenced the Dems' strategy.

There were plenty of examples even back in the primaries. Look at the way Jeb! was ridiculed, or Sanders's biggest line of traction (paid speeches). The Democratic primaries were more issue- driven, but as it unfolded it became more and more about personality and trustworthiness (which isn't to say there were no issue driven motives to arrive at that debate about honesty).
 
The Democratic convention itself wasn't much better. They set the tone, aided/forced by Trump, and the media, again, aided/forced by Trump, has followed.

This makes no sense. They set the tone because Donald made them. So...Donald set the tone. The republicans set their stall out in the train wreck they called a primary. Compare that to the democratic primary.

This isn't entirely directed at you but...This "they're as bad as each other" nonsense has to stop. A kid getting C-s isn't the same as a kid failing right across the board. It's just an excuse for people so they don't have to learn more, or educate themselves about politics.
 
This makes no sense. They set the tone because Donald made them. So...Donald set the tone. The republicans set their stall out in the train wreck they called a primary. Compare that to the democratic primary.

This isn't entirely directed at you but...This "they're as bad as each other" nonsense has to stop. A kid getting C-s isn't the same as a kid failing right across the board. It's just an excuse for people so they don't have to learn more, or educate themselves about politics.

Lol.
Donald Trump isn't pulling the DNC's strings. As @InfiniteBoredom pointed out, they probably focus-grouped this and found that Clinton v Trump is better if they focus on his personality rather than her policies.
Contrast the speeches by Bernie and maybe Warren on one side and everyone else, but especially the much-praised stuff from Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama on the other. There is a strong case to be made against Trump's promised economic policies. But Hillary does better when focusing on his persona.
 
So would losing NC sink him regardless of the other swings, same as Florida? I can't run the numbers just yet...

Losing NC or FL and it is definitely over. He would have to run the table in places like MI, MN, CO, and VA to compensate - all states where he is behind significantly at the moment.
 
Lol.
Donald Trump isn't pulling the DNC's strings. As @InfiniteBoredom pointed out, they probably focus-grouped this and found that Clinton v Trump is better if they focus on his personality rather than her policies.
Contrast the speeches by Bernie and maybe Warren on one side and everyone else, but especially the much-praised stuff from Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama on the other. There is a strong case to be made against Trump's promised economic policies. But Hillary does better when focusing on his persona.

Of course she does-that is like shooting fish in a barrel!
 
538 is raising chances for Dump while everybody else is doing the opposite. I am slightly nervous.
North Carolina, Florida and Nevada are still blue in their latest forecasting. And Hillary can lose all three of them (quite unlikely IMO) and still win the election as long as she wins New Hampshire (+2.9 at the moment).
 
North Carolina, Florida and Nevada are still blue in their latest forecasting. And Hillary can lose all three of them (quite unlikely IMO) and still win the election as long as she wins New Hampshire (+2.9 at the moment).
They are crunching in new polls, that were not available when I made that post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.