Holy feck! Democrats winning at Rasmussen, I never thought that I will see this day coming.
Now all we need is United to be the preferred team in Liverpool.
Of course she does-that is like shooting fish in a barrel!
And this one is identical to mine.
Imma just leave this right here:
http://truthfeed.com/breaking-bombs...desta-brothers-to-child-abduction-case/34348/
Imma just leave this right here:
http://truthfeed.com/breaking-bombs...desta-brothers-to-child-abduction-case/34348/
this story is developing and there is not yet confirmation yet that these reports are 100% accurate
this changes EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!1111111111111!!!!!!!!!!111
Let's not forget. Tim Kaine has never lost an election - ever.
Honestly why?Imma just leave this right here:
http://truthfeed.com/breaking-bombs...desta-brothers-to-child-abduction-case/34348/
Honestly why?
It would be pretty great if she just carried on Obama's policies with regard to foreign policy. They're definitely not perfect (you can criticise a lot of them), but in a pragmatic world I think it's going to be difficult to get any better.Sadly no talk of foreign interventions.
It would be pretty great if she just carried on Obama's policies with regard to foreign policy. They're definitely not perfect (you can criticise a lot of them), but in a pragmatic world I think it's going to be difficult to get any better.
I didn't even get that far!No shit
Sadly no talk of foreign interventions.
Would also be great to see her try and sort out the Palestinian/Israeli issue once and for all. A two state solution has to come about.
I'm not banking on it. I think there will be a more hawkish tone, but you never know. I've said it before, but Clinton can change her views 180 degrees very quickly. She's masterful at gauging public opinion and responding to it. Her record definitely shows that (race issues, gay marriage, Iraq). So it is possible. We'll see.Fat chance.
It would be pretty great if she just carried on Obama's policies with regard to foreign policy. They're definitely not perfect (you can criticise a lot of them), but in a pragmatic world I think it's going to be difficult to get any better.
Would also be great to see her try and sort out the Palestinian/Israeli issue once and for all. A two state solution has to come about.
Fat chance.
I know all this, but she also said that to an Israeli audience. I know of her support for AIPAC, and, more broadly speaking, Israel in general. But, as President things change quite a bit. She'll be forced into seeking resolution and responding to public opinion from both home and abroad.Again, even less likely. She's vehemently pro-Israel there's no chance she'll concede anything to the Palestinians if it upsets her lobbyists. I mean she even suggested rigging the Palestinian elections to make sure someone they want wins
Banter (actually: just intrigued to see how/what the sides are doing in their last ditch efforts to pick up more votes/turn the undecideds, etc).Honestly why?
Would also be great to see her try and sort out the Palestinian/Israeli issue once and for all. A two state solution has to come about.
Now, that's just wishful thinking. Far more capable people have tried and failed.Would also be great to see her try and sort out the Palestinian/Israeli issue once and for all. A two state solution has to come about.
I'm not banking on it. I think there will be a more hawkish tone, but you never know. I've said it before, but Clinton can change her views 180 degrees very quickly. She's masterful at gauging public opinion and responding to it. Her record definitely shows that (race issues, gay marriage, Iraq). So it is possible. We'll see.
Israel needs to stop building settlements, the Palestinians need to accept that certain demands just won't be met. It's possible and will happen when both people have had enough.That conflict will be not be resolved hundreds of years after we're both long gone