Red Dreams
Full Member
Can't see Arizona going Blue.
think the assumption is the Latino vote turning out in force against Trump.
Can't see Arizona going Blue.
It's really not that much of a stretch, check out this on 538 - http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-swing-the-election/
I moved white (college) to 50/50 from 56%GOP, white (non-college) to 56%GOP from 62% GOP, hispanic to 80%DEM from 71%DEM, asian to 73%DEM from 67%DEM. Got to 451. There's decent arguments to be made that Trump would have aliened/put off/disgusted that number in each demographic to make it viable. In fact perhaps the most optimistic thing about it would be Hillary getting the same turnout and support that Obama got with african-americans. But inheriting his ground game and campaign staff like Jim Messina, it's also certainly within reason.
Maybe I just have too much faith in americans.
Can't see Arizona going Blue.
Hillary will not engender as high a turn out as Obama did imo, which will undercut the perceived Dem landslide. Also, if Trump wins the nomination, he will quickly do a U-turn on his aggressive policies to unlock some of the independent voters.
It's really not that much of a stretch, check out this on 538 - http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-swing-the-election/
I moved white (college) to 50/50 from 56%GOP, white (non-college) to 56%GOP from 62% GOP, hispanic to 80%DEM from 71%DEM, asian to 73%DEM from 67%DEM. Got to 451. There's decent arguments to be made that Trump would have aliened/put off/disgusted that number in each demographic to make it viable. In fact perhaps the most optimistic thing about it would be Hillary getting the same turnout and support that Obama got with african-americans. But inheriting his ground game and campaign staff like Jim Messina, it's also certainly within reason.
Maybe I just have too much faith in americans.
playing devil's advocate. what about voters turning out to vote against Trump?
Pivot to the centre is pretty much undoable with Trump, he's doubled down too often. Hillary could struggle on turnout particularly if it looks a done deal beforehand, but I think that's even more likely to depress GOP turnout except with the hardcore base, whereas Hillary could use his hateability to get people to the polls.Hillary will not engender as high a turn out as Obama did imo, which will undercut the perceived Dem landslide. Also, if Trump wins the nomination, he will quickly do a U-turn on his aggressive policies to unlock some of the independent voters.
Among the GOP base I'd agree, but I can't imagine there'd be many of them that would go from an Obama 2012 voter to a Trump 2016 voter, whereas I could certainly imagine a fair few that went Romney in 2012 not wanting to get behind Trump. I tried halving the change to 3% though and compensated with 3% extra college voters for the Dems and it was back up to 448. It's a fairly blunt estimate but it does show this wouldn't take huge unreasonable switches.His greatest support is white non-college, you can switch all the other groups around but I think it would be unrealistic to reduce Trump's proportion from them.
Yup and let's also not forget that other group he tends to alienate - women, who make up most of the electorate.agree Ubik. Also lets not discount the growing Muslim vote. They will never forget or forgive what he said.
Cruz is doing very well - cloaking his nutty right wing views and coming across as a normal GOP kinda guy, while simultaneously avoiding criticizing Trump. Mind you, if Cruz gets too close to Trump in the polls, Donald will hit him hard.
Cruz is doing very well - cloaking his nutty right wing views and coming across as a normal GOP kinda guy, while simultaneously avoiding criticizing Trump. Mind you, if Cruz gets too close to Trump in the polls, Donald will hit him hard.
I have decided to postpone my trip to Israel and to schedule my meeting with @Netanyahu at a later date after I become President of the U.S.
So, you went to 'Merica for PhD? How it is going on?I don't remember for sure but I think Cruz has high unfavourables, and a lot of people saying "will never vote for" him too (not as bad as Trump though).
IMO Rubio remains their best shot. But Cruz becoming president would scare me the most. Trump is unrealistic, and also, he may not cut science budgets, but I'm sure Cruz will, and Rubio probably will too. Right now I have funding but I fear what will happen if they get in (and I have to hunt for profs with funding since mine ends in 2017). On the other hand, I look middle-eastern enough, so that's a reason to not want Trump...
New NYT/CBS News poll GOP national -
Trump 35%
Cruz 16
Carson 13
Rubio 9
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...-solidifies-his-lead-but-leaves-many-nervous/
The fact that Jeb "prove you're a Christian" Bush is what counts as normal, says a lot about the GOP.Their 'normal' candidate was supposed to be Jeb Bush. Now even Rubio is fading. This is going to be hilarious.
I think that his bro' getting re-elected says a lot for GOP and America.The fact that Jeb "prove you're a Christian" Bush is what counts as normal, says a lot about the GOP.
I think that his bro' getting re-elected says a lot for GOP and America.
The fact that Jeb "prove you're a Christian" Bush is what counts as normal, says a lot about the GOP.
Haven't seen any media coverage on the Democrats recently.
Haven't seen any media coverage on the Democrats recently.
The fact that Jeb "prove you're a Christian" Bush is what counts as normal, says a lot about the GOP.
You'd imagine it'll backfire on him at some point
“most of the black scientists in this country do not come from the most advanced schools” and added that black students do better in a “slower track.”
Scalia also said students of color are being “pushed into schools that are too advanced for them” due to race conscious affirmative action policies.