MrMarcello
In a well-ordered universe...
Can we just take a moment and caption what the black guy next to him is thinking right then?
"Not much longer and I get my $500 for being here."
Can we just take a moment and caption what the black guy next to him is thinking right then?
Forget the obstructionists. He started his first term with a solid senate majority. But he couldn't make it count.
You mean he started with a senate AND house majority, passed Obamacare, pissed off conservatives and lost the house in a low-turnout midterm election. Ever since then he has not been able to get a single significant initiative through Congress.
I just think Obama could have done lot more. Don't get me wrong, he is a great leader but as a politician he had a lot to learn during his first term.
I just think Obama could have done lot more. Don't get me wrong, he is a great leader but as a politician he had a lot to learn during his first term.
He had filibuster-proof majority in Senate for 3 months, and a third of House Dems were blue dog Democrats recruited by Howard Dean's famed 50 state strategy who weren't afraid to vote against him to save their seats (which they eventually lost in the 2010 midterm anyway)
Throw the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression into the mix and he didn't have a lot of political capital to work with anymore.
He knew the circumstances under which he was taking office. This isn't to take credit away from what he has accomplished. But he was a bit too arrogant in his approach/strategy which in turn caused the political paralysis during the later part of his term.
"Not much longer and I get my $500 for being here."
Sitting there, right beyond Donald at his rally. Apparently they´re buddies. You might remember Mark the veteran Florida congressman from his many visits on Bill O´reilly show on Fox: "Mark Foley is the co-chairman of the House Missing and Exploited Children Caucus. He's been on this program many times on FOX News Channel, often talking about protecting the kids."
Here´s Mark Foley caught texting 16 year old congressional male pages: "how's my favorite young stud doing did you spank it this weekend where did you unload it cute butt bouncing in the air."
I do think he makes a fair point, actually. It's obviously not just that, as there are many more factors at play, but going for lesser evils on a consistent basis can end up alienating large portions of a voter-base and lead to long-term division.
Look at the Labour party. Their switch to a more moderate approach under Blair was immensely successful for a sustained period...yet they now appear to be on the brink of collapse because the membership vastly prefers a perceived anti-establishment option who isn't what typically would win an election or be expected of a major party, but appeals to voters. Many feel the moderate option is still better, yet the party membership is no longer willing to tolerate the things they believe the party have done fundamentally wrong for the sake of a greater chance of government.
Likewise, someone such as Farage largely built UKIP's support by capitalising on disillusioned Tories at first who felt like the party was doing nothing on the issue of Europe. Those who switched from Tory to UKIP in 2015 probably knew they were risking a Labour alternative who wouldn't give them a referendum...yet still did it anyway. Farage then further built support for Brexit by capitalising upon Labour disillusionment of a different kind to Corbyn supporters in the north.
The Dems have arguably been lucky this time due to the fact that their opponent is so abhorrent and incompetent and within an extremely divided and outdated party. But with a more competent opposition next time? It's perfectly possible the Republicans could one day capitalise on frustrations within the Dems (such as those of Sanders supporters) if they become a lot more widespread and mainstream in years to come. Not that it's an immediate pressing issue, but I'm not sure it's one that should be dismissed at hand.
I just think Obama could have done lot more. Don't get me wrong, he is a great leader but as a politician he had a lot to learn during his first term.
He knew the circumstances under which he was taking office. This isn't to take credit away from what he has accomplished. But he was a bit too arrogant in his approach/strategy which in turn caused the political paralysis during the later part of his term.
The whole idea of the USA was an ideal. A country that made people that wanted to gain wealth from hard work be an owner and a family that was independent. That's were the 2nd ammendment comes from. A people that can defend themselves against a tyrannical government .
That is an America I can say feck yeah. Theres a lot of people that can't be bothered to even vote.
Me personally I'm not one. This country took! In and has done me well . I do get the issues
I just think Obama could have done lot more. Don't get me wrong, he is a great leader but as a politician he had a lot to learn during his first term.
Now non of this would really matter, if politicians would do a decent job. Lets face it, most people don´t care about democracy or really anything as long as government can deliver favorable policy outcomes.
Really? That's a slippery slope you are getting on. If not democracy, what else? Communism? Benevolent dictatorship? Maybe it doesn't work well and frustrates the hell out of me...but still I can't think of anything better as alternative.
The important point to note is that any mode of governance is just a tool. It depends on people on how to use it. Blaming the government when it's the same people who elected it is just going around in circles.
As I said before, solution would be to implement a None of the Above option in ballots to avoid having to mandatorily choose between the two.
The political paralysis took place because of Republican obstructionism, including GOP members who questioned his birth certificate and heckled him during State of the Union speeches. His only mistake was spending the first two years attempting to work with them, which they cynically used to waste time until they could erode his popularity and regain control of Congress in 2010, which led to 6 years of unprecedented obstructionism on nearly every policy.
I miss the days when Bernie was running vs Hillary and everybody was talking sense about Hillary and her true colors.
Now, because the opposite candidate is a man child, some are trying to make Hillary look like a nobel prize candidate, when she is exactly the same shit as republicans.
People forget way too easily, and is manipulated by the media even easier. The establishment celebrates.
just a little reminder... although it will be ignored and forgotten.
Bernie is gone and isn't coming back. There are only two viable candidates left and its really pointless to look backward as if doing so will change the reality of the present.
I miss the days when Bernie was running vs Hillary and everybody was talking sense about Hillary and her true colors.
Now, because the opposite candidate is a man child, some are trying to make Hillary look like a nobel prize candidate, when she is exactly the same shit as republicans.
People forget way too easily, and is manipulated by the media even easier. The establishment celebrates.
just a little reminder... although it will be ignored and forgotten.
I can't believe that this needs to be stated daily.
Just had an USCIS officer come to my office for a spot check on my visa extension. I'm on L1-A. Client scheduled an interview in a meeting room and the interview went fine and he wanted to visit my desk as well. Had Manchester United scarfs and photos and he said 'football?' He also wanted a copy of my paystub, so I had to access adp site for a print out. While I was taking printouts, he saw bookmarks for the USCIS green card process in Chrome and asked me if I'm applying.
I told him that I haven't taken the final decision and it will depend one way or another on the election results in November. If he's a republican and he's kicking me out, at least I'm going out in protest
Isn't there some changes in your visa/tax status if you apply? I remember reading something like that while filing last year.
Really? That's a slippery slope you are getting on. If not democracy, what else? Communism? Benevolent dictatorship? Maybe it doesn't work well and frustrates the hell out of me...but still I can't think of anything better as alternative.
The important point to note is that any mode of governance is just a tool. It depends on people on how to use it. Blaming the government when it's the same people who elected it is just going around in circles.
As I said before, solution would be to implement a None of the Above option in ballots to avoid having to mandatorily choose between the two.
Really? That's a slippery slope you are getting on. If not democracy, what else? Communism? Benevolent dictatorship? Maybe it doesn't work well and frustrates the hell out of me...but still I can't think of anything better as alternative.
The important point to note is that any mode of governance is just a tool. It depends on people on how to use it. Blaming the government when it's the same people who elected it is just going around in circles.
As I said before, solution would be to implement a None of the Above option in ballots to avoid having to mandatorily choose between the two.
I ment what marcelofalcon said. As long as the economy is doing fine, few people complain about government overreach or bad governance. Just look at China or turkey, but the same is true in our countries.
There is no easy solution; you can't stop the electorate from making dumb choices. What we need is a more enlightened democratic culture.
Aye. I'll volunteer, if need be.
My point isn't that China has a superior system. Of course not. Still the people support the party (to some extend) despite all the repression as long as they continue to enjoy enough yoy%gdp growth. If the US economy would take a nosedive in the next 70 days, trump would have a reasonable shot at winning despite his horror show. The Arab spring was (not exclusively, but to some extend) triggered by economic problems. My point is: most people can accept a lot of things as long as they are doing alright.Awful examples. I've lived in China and will say hands down, I pity all of them. The government is big on 'Ignorance is bliss' and the local populace has little or no knowledge on global events. Social media is banned, no freedom of any kind and absolutely no check on government. Yes, economically it is big...but without freedom, it just becomes a rich prison.
Agree with that, though!
There's a famous quote about this but I can't place it right nowMy point is: most people can accept a lot of things as long as they are doing alright.
This GE election cycle has left me disgusted with the entire system and public as a whole.
This blonde woman on CNN should be (insert word of choice) for agreeing with Trump that Pres Obama is the founder of ISIS, especially immediately AFTER a retired General had just explained to the panel exactly how ISIS began (he obviously has actual knowledge and isn't just some ideologue). This is exactly why I refuse to debate persons and comment on social media posts. Most persons are too far up their own ass to entertain a differing opinion (especially when facts support the opposing view). This GE election cycle has left me disgusted with the entire system and public as a whole.
They can never stay on topic. Talking about tax returns, having a bit of back and forth, and the Trump side resorts to "what's in those emails?" It's always pivot to red herrings.