Red Dreams
Full Member
I don't keep up too much. Is Clinton beating Bush by a moderate margin still seen as the most likely of the possible scenarios?
She will be by early next year. Bush is so weak.
I don't keep up too much. Is Clinton beating Bush by a moderate margin still seen as the most likely of the possible scenarios?
I don't keep up too much. Is Clinton beating Bush by a moderate margin still seen as the most likely of the possible scenarios?
Chafee's debate summarized:
The real game starts in Feb next year. Last batch of emails out by then and its primaries season in full swing. I'm actually wondering if Hillary has the balls (figuratively) to pick Sanders as a running mate. She will probably play it safe by the end and pick Webb but a Hillary-Bernie ticket paying off can give the Dems Congress as well as the Presidency.
Hillary is never ever going to pick Sanders as a VP - there is more chance of her picking someone from the Republican party...
why is corporate media allowed to be a campaign contributer . cnn us vs cnn int
Wouldn't be surprised if Biden now announces he won't stand, Hillary seems to have this under control.
Does Castro really have the experience though? I'm still thinking it'll be someone like Kaine.Biden wont stand. And Hillary will probably pick Castro as VP.
Clinton has played this really well, she sounds like an electable version of Sanders.
My favorite is Chafee, he reminds me of that guy who accidentally got interviewed on the bbc as an expert.
What do you make of his previous votes on gun laws?Thought Sanders did really well. His authenticity and voting record appeal to a lot of young people that are tired of politics as usual. Tough to get the nomination over Hillary but he will bring out many people that didn't vote last time around.
Bernie's supporters getting salty , citing online polls as proof he won the debate .
I think he didn't hurt himself, but that exchange on gun control took a lot of wind out of his sails. Didn't seem to defend himself well at all, whereas Clinton has all the experience in the world in those scenarios
Dude's from Vermont. What do you expect?What do you make of his previous votes on gun laws?
Does Castro really have the experience though? I'm still thinking it'll be someone like Kaine.
I thought they came out of it pretty even.(...)
Castro will win her 2016, but the Dems will lose 2020 as a result.True. Think she will go for a hispanic though. To offset Rubio who looks nailed on for VP at least.
Coming out even is not good enough for him. He is still miles behind and those debates won´t change that.
As much as I despise her, I do agree that Hillary comes across as the most 'presidential' when standing up there next to some of those clowns. On a personal level, I find Bernie to be much more compelling but I think America will find him too much of a nutty professor type. That and his self-proclaimed socialist tag won't fly with most Americans.
That'd be the "block of granite" Chafee.The other 3 fellas up there are stocking filler. We'll barely remember their names by the time the next election rolls round. I've forgotten the poor fella on the far end already.
I know there's a campaign to portray Clinton as untrustworthy because she flip flops on her opinions, but I don't trust her because she just seems so insincere. Everything she says is trying to be a soundbite and that horrible condescending smile just ruins her credibility. You'd think that with all her resources, and all her experience in campaigning, she would have people working on her style and demeanour to come across as more genuine. If that's the best they can come up with then what must she really be like?
Are we here to amuse you? This and your pizza post make me very sad.I kind of want to see Trump in power. He'd feck the country up so badly it'd give the rest of the world a proper laugh.
She's always been one who polarizes opinions. Generally speaking, I think she's sincere on a lot of domestic issues, like women' rights, child hood education, paid leave etc... But a hawk on foreign policies, a female W, if you like. It's hard to marry the two stances together so she'll never come off authentic to a liberal audience.
My distrust isn't even based on her views or policies. She could be reading out last nights baseball results and I'd still want to check ESPN afterwards.
She's pretty middle of the road in her views and policies, which is fine IMO. I simply find her to be disingenuous. A true politician. That and under her facade, she's a raging bitch.She's always been one who polarizes opinions. Generally speaking, I think she's sincere on a lot of domestic issues, like women' rights, child hood education, paid leave etc... But a hawk on foreign policies, a female W, if you like. It's hard to marry the two stances together so she'll never come off authentic to a liberal audience.
That and under her facade, she's a raging bitch.
40 years in politics tend to sap all the personality out of you. Didn't help either that she was brought up in a conservative household.