Raw
Full Member
Wasn't that supposed to be something he wore around his waist to help in his back recovery? I mean look how square it is in the first image.Oh he did.
Who ate all Depay's?
Wasn't that supposed to be something he wore around his waist to help in his back recovery? I mean look how square it is in the first image.Oh he did.
Who ate all Depay's?
Best to stay away from signing players who've had bad injuries, we might end up with another Hargreaves. Paying people to turn up and cheer the team on a training is a waste of funds.If fit and on form he'd provide an entirely new dimension to that inside left channel Fellaini is currently occupying. However he's lost a lot of the bounce and dynamism since his injury. Back injuries are notoriously hard to heal so may be he'll be back to his best soon. For 15 mil, we could do a lot worse.
Best to stay away from signing players who've had bad injuries, we might end up with another Hargreaves. Paying people to turn up and cheer the team on a training is a waste of funds.
Best to stay away from signing players who've had bad injuries, we might end up with another Hargreaves. Paying people to turn up and cheer the team on a training is a waste of funds.
Or (from a glass half full perspective) - we might end up with another Van Nistelrooy whose transfer was delayed because he was sidelined for a whole season with injury at PSV Eindhoven ? Anyway, I don't understand why Gundogan is being written off completely. Back injuries require a longer rehabilitation period and he is progressing well. The fee being quoted could be a bargain if we can get him up to full form. There's always a sense of risk involved with transfers. You could buy a player with spotless fitness and he could tear his ACL in the first pre-season game rendering all prognostications obsolete.
Or (from a glass half full perspective) - we might end up with another Van Nistelrooy whose transfer was delayed because he was sidelined for a whole season with injury at PSV Eindhoven ? Anyway, I don't understand why Gundogan is being written off completely. Back injuries require a longer rehabilitation period and he is progressing well. The fee being quoted could be a bargain if we can get him up to full form. There's always a sense of risk involved with transfers. You could buy a player with spotless fitness and he could tear his ACL in the first pre-season game rendering all prognostications obsolete.
True. But van Nistelrooy was an exception to the rule wasn't he. Rio never seemed to fully recover from his back injury. Maybe let someone else have him, take Hummels all day long though,
Rafa said:In terms of back injuries, worth remembering that John Terry (who's just had a thread started about his amazing ability to play so much football, aged 34) had serious problems with his back just a few years back.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/6215445.stm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...erve-problem-rule-Chelsea-captain-months.html
I also thought the medication he was on caused some bloating, makes a lot of sense.Wasn't that supposed to be something he wore around his waist to help in his back recovery? I mean look how square it is in the first image.
I was gonna quote the post and tag you. I'm 50/50 on Gundogan, 2 years ago he was a dream signing, now there is a large element of risk.
Dream signing 2 years ago alright man, but would he have come to United & would Dortmund have sold him? I think not, is my opinion man. Far too many top teams were drooling over him then & we've lost out on so many players in the past because of Real & Barca too.
This is a massive chance to sign him & one we shouldnt turn down. He just needs a good rest during the summer & then a full pre-season. He's only 24, so he's plenty of years left in him to shine like he did before his back problems became unbearable..
Kicker is reliable when it comes to Bayern, right?
I would have loved him back then, too.
While he was still with Nuremberg, he said we are a dream club to go to. Apparently we were scouting him back then. Obviously it doesn't mean much, but I always felt that he is genuinely interested in joining us unlike others.
Reliable regarding most clubs in Germany. There were bettter in the past though.
Hargreaves, Falcao, Owen, almost Vermaelen.
Pretty poor examples. Hargreaves was one yeah, but he was amazing in his first season and the reason he ended up being a crock was due to him playing on when he should not of.
Owen was free, and well worthy of a sub role that he was brought in for.
Falcao was one of the best strikers in the world, and he's come here on a loan. Worth the risk imho.
Dream signing 2 years ago alright man, but would he have come to United & would Dortmund have sold him? I think not, is my opinion man. Far too many top teams were drooling over him then & we've lost out on so many players in the past because of Real & Barca too.
This is a massive chance to sign him & one we shouldnt turn down. He just needs a good rest during the summer & then a full pre-season. He's only 24, so he's plenty of years left in him to shine like he did before his back problems became unbearable..
I would have loved him back then, too.
Has he lost all that weight he put on?
Just wondering, if say LvG also bought one of Schneiderlin/Kondogbia/Krychowiak to be a more pure DM with Gundogan as the replacement for Carrick's ability to dictate a game, would you be more inclined to take the chance on him?
Kagawa standing around watching others play. Plus ca change...He's still got a bit but here's an image from the weekend.
Hasn't he played like he has 'lead in his boots' this season?
Just wondering, if say LvG also bought one of Schneiderlin/Kondogbia/Krychowiak to be a more pure DM with Gundogan as the replacement for Carrick's ability to dictate a game, would you be more inclined to take the chance on him?
That's the key for me..I don't think he will be the only signing in midfield if we get him...surely a more combative enforcer will be bought in to protect the back four and mop up...we have apparently been scouting Sporting a lot again this season..I know Nani is there but talk of Carvahlo being watched..?
We definitely need a strong and mobile presence in the middle of the park to play in Carricks position, I think the dictation of the game is Gundogan main strength, his long and short passing are equal to Carricks for sure so two players to equal all Carricks qualities will probably be needed with the added bonus of power and pace which Carrick lacks.
It's definitely a two man job I think, and we have lacked enough physical presence in midfield quite some time. I don't know about Carvalho, he seemed to have been more of a Moyes target, but judging by the prices quoted we could get this midfield up to scratch for close to £50M for Gundogan and Schneiderlin.
There are so many posts in this thread from posters comparing Gundogan to players with knee or other leg injuries, which are completely incomparable.In terms of back injuries, worth remembering that John Terry (who's just had a thread started about his amazing ability to play so much football, aged 34) had serious problems with his back just a few years back.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/6215445.stm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...erve-problem-rule-Chelsea-captain-months.html
It would say Kicker is reliable for all german clubs.Kicker is reliable when it comes to Bayern, right?
Do people realize that the crock has played more than Herrera, Blind or Carrick this season?
Schneiderlin would be my preference but he seems Arsenal bound according to most reports.
Real quality player who has very similar qualities to Carricks whereas he always seems to be in the right place to intercept and sweep up, think he also has more of a tackle in him than Carrick although not necessarily a complete DM. I think the tenacity of Herrera and these two would give enough bite in the middle when defending and also offer a hell of a lot going forward and keeping the ball.
It would say Kicker is reliable for all german clubs.
the reason he was out for a year was because of his "back" right? no recurrence of that injury since or what? just asking.
I always like to think we could win any transfer battle for a non South American or Iberian player you are probably right, and Real Madrid did seem to be going for him after he played so well against them, but his back injury halted things.
My biggest concern is if he is our only CM buy. I think we need another great passer in midfield who can control a game, Gundogan can fit that bill but has a question mark over whether the dynamic side of his game will return to succeed in a league as physically demanding as the PL. However I just don't want anything to block us getting in a more athletic and physical option as well, I think we have all seen how important a Matic type of CM is in this league.
No. He is not injury prone either. Sometimes missed a match - but nothing really serious...
He missed 4 matches this season after his injury because he still had fitness deficits - and 3 single matches since then because of things like the flu etc.
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/ilkay-gundogan/verletzungen/spieler/53622
There are so many posts in this thread from posters comparing Gundogan to players with knee or other leg injuries, which are completely incomparable.
I had an operation to solve a nerve problem (sciatica) back in December, and my surgeon kept referring to Terry as an example that if all went well, I should be able to get back to playing football no problem. I told him about Gundogan who seemed to have a vaguely similar problem (although Gundogan always referred to it as 'nerve inflammation') and how he'd been struggling to find a solution, despite being able to afford the best medical advice money can buy.
He said that ultimately, the nerve pain that we all experienced is down to something pressing on the nerve. I think this was a slipped disc in all 3 cases, where the fluid that 'slips' out, isn't consumed (for want of a better word) by the body. Once that fluid is successfully removed, there is no reason you will suffer from the pain/injury again. I was told by the surgeon and 2 physio's since, that there isn't an increased chance of the injury recurring once it's fully healed. I see no reason why it would be different with Gundogan or Terry.
Terry's recovery was very quick if I remember correctly, as his operation was clearly particularly successful. Gundogan's was messy and they struggled to remove all of the fluid. From what I've read (which is quite a lot as I was interested in Gundogan's case and it's similarities to my own problems) the surgeons like to give it a reasonable amount of time after each operation, before considering the next step. That was part the reason for Gundogan's lengthy lay off, as he needed multiple operations to completely solve his problem.
Lastly for those who keep bringing up his weight - You have to know that this nerve pain is unlike any other injury. It makes ALL movement painful. It's very difficult to find any form of exercise that isn't painful, which was clearly a problem for Gundogan. Personally I found the only exercise I could do was breaststroke (every other stroke hurt) and even then only for maybe 30mins. He obviously has a stocky build, so struggled with his weight. Again, this was no doubt another reason why he was out for so long, as he must have spent sometime behind closed doors losing weight and building up basic fitness.
TL;DR - Physically there is no reason for him not to get back to his best.