He'd replace Carrick's passing and playmaking but not his defensive contribution. We need another midfielder for that, like Vidal or Schneiderlin.
It's not gone forever though I wouldn't say... He was never amazing defensively, but like Herrera, always put in a good solid shift. Now he's not quite as mobile but that's all part of his recovery I think, wouldn't be surprised to see him back to how he was before his injury next season, and if so, his defensive work would be fine. It's just that while he can be a Carrick replacement in some aspects, we'd still need a proper defensive player next to him. He'd provide Carrick's passing range, creativity, add more energy and runs going forward and better/quicker link up play alongside Herrera and some much needed depth, but we'd need like Vidal at the box to box position if we want Gundogan to be the holding midfielder, otherwise he'll probably be next to Herrera with another one behind them.The general consensus seems to be that his defensive contribution has regressed to almost nothing, since the injury. As its taken his mobility away, and he's less inclined to get 'stuck in'.
The general consensus seems to be that his defensive contribution has regressed to almost nothing, since the injury. As its taken his mobility away, and he's less inclined to get 'stuck in'.
No, that is actually not the point. Gündogan isn´t a defensive liability.
Gündogan never played in the “carrick” role. He played alongside a classic DM/destroyer as mobile focal point of the team. He connected (defense), midfield and attack and he is able to contribute in all those areas. Using him as defensive anchor would seriously hamper him and doesn’t fit his natural game.
For all people who didn´t watch him frequently: The comparison with Modric (or with Schweinsteiger) is fairly helpful to understand his skill-set.
Could Modric anchor a midfield? He could probably do a decent job in this role; maybe not on the highest level but it wouldn´t be a disaster.
Should be play in this role? No. Modric can do so much more and restricting his movement/the space where we can play would be stupid. He is precisely the kind of player you want alongside a more defensive player to give your team great balance/control.
It's not gone forever though I wouldn't say... He was never amazing defensively, but like Herrera, always put in a good solid shift. Now he's not quite as mobile but that's all part of his recovery I think, wouldn't be surprised to see him back to how he was before his injury next season, and if so, his defensive work would be fine. It's just that while he can be a Carrick replacement in some aspects, we'd still need a proper defensive player next to him. He'd provide Carrick's passing range, creativity, add more energy and runs going forward and better/quicker link up play alongside Herrera and some much needed depth, but we'd need like Vidal at the box to box position if we want Gundogan to be the holding midfielder, otherwise he'll probably be next to Herrera with another one behind them.
The general consensus of people who dont even know that he isnt a DM/holding midfielder?
Overall his contribution has regress to “very little” since the injury (except for a few games after coming back, where he played well). If any top club goes after him it’s not because of what he did this year, but because of what he potentially could do in good form.
No, that is actually not the point. Gündogan isn´t a defensive liability.
Gündogan never played in the “carrick” role. He played alongside a classic DM/destroyer as mobile focal point of the team. He connected (defense), midfield and attack and he is able to contribute in all those areas. Using him as defensive anchor would seriously hamper him and doesn’t fit his natural game.
For all people who didn´t watch him frequently: The comparison with Modric (or with Schweinsteiger) is fairly helpful to understand his skill-set.
Could Modric anchor a midfield? He could probably do a decent job in this role; maybe not on the highest level but it wouldn´t be a disaster.
Should be play in this role? No. Modric can do so much more and restricting his movement/the space where we can play would be stupid. He is precisely the kind of player you want alongside a more defensive player to give your team great balance/control.
Scholes, Pirlo and Schweinsteiger all started in attacking positions before dropping deeper into midfield. In the case of Scholes, it was partly due to him losing some mobility, which seems to be the same concern that's currently hanging over Gundogan.
Defensive positioning is something that most players pick up with experience, particularly intelligent ones. The Gundogan of 2 years ago may have been wasted as a DM, but his current incarnation may be better suited to the role. LvG has already successfully changed the instincts of Herrera at United, and let's not forget what he did to Schweinsteiger as well.
Lots of conjecture in this post, I know.
Sounds like Vidal.We need someone for the Carrick position. Oh and while we're at it we need a DM, a Keane replacement, and a "midfield enforcer".
We need someone for the Carrick position. Oh and while we're at it we need a DM, a Keane replacement, and a "midfield enforcer".
Sounds like Vidal.
I'm sorry about that. I went full muppet mode on Vidal last summer and have yet to recoverIt was tongue and cheek. But yeah, i'd take Vidal in a heartbeat.
yeah, that's it and I also believe that we should aim for different kind of player let alone we won't find very similar players of Carrick's mould. Not sure if Gundogan is what we need but there are several posibilities how to set up midfield three. I guess one of the attributes LVG wants his midfielder to have is physical strength, which is why I quite doubt we are in for Gundogan. Countless times were playing with Fellaini and Rooney in midfield for that reason..I think we're getting a bit too hung up on the "Carrick position." With different players, the system will change, especially the dynamic of the midfield 3. The Carrick role is a single pivot at the base of the midfield. Gundogan can easily be one of a double pivot in something that approaches a 4-2-3-1.
What is it about a kolportierten agreement with Manchester United? Gündogan asks back laughing: "I would have it but probably know first, right?" And the rumors of a transfer to FC Barcelona commented the midfielder calmly: "This is a great club, but there is certainly still one or the other association, which is great too.." Especially as the Catalans in the summer nor the Transfer Ban subject, a change so at the earliest in January 2016 and would be possible. Currently Gündogan has spoken in its commitment with any club.
I think that was when he said something along the lines of "If a deal was agreed I would think that I would know about it"
When asked about the rumoured move to United, he's laughing and asks back "Shouldn't I be the first one to know about it?". He's basically saying that there's nothing true about the rumours that a deal with United is already agreed on.
Ah, ok. Thanks for the translationWhen asked about the rumoured move to United, he's laughing and asks back "Shouldn't I be the first one to know about it?". He's basically saying that there's nothing true about the rumours that a deal with United is already agreed on.
The whole article isn't worth discussing in my opinion. He says that he could see himself staying for the final year of his contract in Dortmund, rules out a move to Wolfsburg and says everything else is possible. So nothing new, even if we believe that he isn't lying (like countless other players in his situation did before).
We had this last week only to be denied by all sources.Sunday Times are saying according to club sources a deal is in place to for Gundogan to join us.
We can have both in a midfield three ahead of Carrick(or his replacement).This guy isn't a Carrick replacement. If he comes in Herrera is being shifted around or is in direct competition. At his best a better player than Herrera but right now he isn't.
Years ago would have loved him but now not too sure.
This guy isn't a Carrick replacement. If he comes in Herrera is being shifted around or is in direct competition. At his best a better player than Herrera but right now he isn't.
Years ago would have loved him but now not too sure.
But a deal wasn't in place for Depay so denying was accurate as there wasn't a deal until his hand was forced. Dortmund are a different kettle of fish. There is no relationship with them as there is with PSV so I don't think they are desperate to sell him.Of course the club will deny it if a deal is already in place. LVG himself said finish all the games first then we can talk about transfers. He was forced on Depay because of PSG
This guy isn't a Carrick replacement. If he comes in Herrera is being shifted around or is in direct competition. At his best a better player than Herrera but right now he isn't.
Years ago would have loved him but now not too sure.