I find this situation embarrassing for United and Van Gaal. We bought the most expensive player in premier league history and just after one season of mix performances we decided that we might want to sell him. It was not like he was in the bottom half of our worst player last season, in fact he was arguable one of our top three performers. Di Maria has already showed the fans the quality he is capable of and I believe if Van Gaal utilizes him better than he did towards the end of season, he will be the type of player that can help us challenge for the title.
Nevertheless, if we do sell him we will lose a quality player. However, like I said earlier, he might be quality but if he can not adopt Van Gaal philosophy then it is better we let him go. It is a case of building a team around Di Maria play style or Van Gaal philosophy and it appears that we are going for the latter.
What's embarrasing about this? We can recoup a record fee after the terrible season he had, if anything from business perspective it'd represent a good deal for United. Imagine buying a luxury car, say BMW, for £50k then it turns out that it has a Yugo quality engine, Dacia quality interior and at the moment it doesn't even run. Then someone comes up and offers you £50k back.