the way Rashford has been deployed this seasons im shocked he scored 5 goals, between large spells on the bench playing in rolls that he isnt good at and when he finaly got played in his position that suits him he was playing in a team not allowed to attack
"Not allowed to attack"? You do realize we were set up to counter? The exact role in which Morata has excelled! Fact is Rashford missed a boatload of chances across the season. His decision-making tends to get poorer when he has more time to decide - this is a flaw no top forward can be allowed to have and one he desperately needs to iron out. This is why his instinctive finishes are great, but you struggle to find the carefully crafted goals in his repertoire. "Between large spells on the bench" like the way Morata had, you mean? "roles he isn't good at" like playing on the wings the way Morata has done in the past? Let's face facts!
I dont see him as world class i see him as the potential to been, to be a top striker, you obviously don't think this so of course your going to look at the situation diffrently.
and come of it you bring in a 70 million pound striker of course thats going to limit a young players playing time, and players need miniutes to progress, they dont just get to mid 20's and be the finished article without player regular football.
ronaldo was massively inconsistent at 18, fans pundits where all calling for him to be replaced and untited had to replace beckham properly..... fergie stuck with him and got the reward.
Nobody was calling for Ronaldo to be dropped; if anything, Fergie restricted his time to the point where we were all screaming for him to be played more! He was not inconsistent as much as his decision-making on the final ball was poor; but this was sorted fairly quickly (remember, he wasn't with us long before winning the Balon d'Or! Crucially, also, it was a different time. We were in a decent spell and were not crying out for immediate success the way we are now. Oh and yes, let's please not compare Rashford with Ronaldo. Even in his worst displays it was obvious that Ronaldo was a star and potentially one of the best in the world. Rashford has (so far) done nothing to show he's anywhere close to that category itself, let alone Ronaldo's level. So no, I don't buy this argument.
for me Morata is a decent striker, currently better then rashford, but is he good enough to be the number one choice striker for a team that wants long term wants to compete for champions leagues, i mean 70 million ish for a guy i think u'd struggle to count in the top 5 strikers in the league, never mind Europe, who has never held down a starting spot........ not to mention risking the career of brightest young striker we have had at the club in over a decade, who has the potentiol if he is managed correctly and applyes himself to be a top striker..... for me that doesn't seem worth it.
That would take us back to around 2006 and the times of young Rooney, Ronaldo and even Tevez. I trust you're not comparing Rashford with those. After those, we've struggled for decent strikers and it's therefore no great achievement to be in the category of the best young strikers after that time. Frankly, we need success (at least progress)
this season and Rashford would not guarantee that. Nor would Martial (after the last season, he's lucky to stay). Morata is a massive upgrade on both. Would I prefer someone else? Yeah, well, in an ideal world, I'd ask for Ronaldo, Messi, Griezmann and Modric. But the fact is, I'm not David Moyes and don't live in an echo chamber. Morata may not be among the top 5 players on the planet, but crucially,
he is among the top 5 forwards known to be available this summer. If you'd rather have the Glazers and the club sit on a boatload of cash while we limp to sixth again while patting yourself on the back for "being patient" with Rashford and Martial, well, all I can say is that I have a different set of hopes and ambitions for the club and a different way of looking at money, viz.
"Money is only worth it if you use it well".