Any info if Shaw and Sanchez trained? Both got knocks and unlikely to start. I hope they do though !Sanchez Lukaku
Shaw Pogba Lingard Young
Fred
Jones Smalling Lindelöf
deGea
Well you're wrong. "Literally" has been used and accepted as a form of emphasis in this manner for a long time.Not sure you know what “literally” means, makes no sense in this context.
I don't think people are overreacting at all.Is it though?
This is a tough away fixture for anybody in the league. You had a poor performance last week but that's not necessarily a sign that the sky is falling in, we're likely to see a response from you and at home your record against the top six is impressive. You're extremely difficult to break down in these kind of games and will always have that presence on the counter, and like I said I expect to see some of the players really go for it and try to shut up some of the media talk. One bad loss doesn't suddenly make you a terrible team.
I think it's very possible it'll end up 1-0/2-1 to you or something, and people will go 'they Spurs'd it!', when really we would have just lost in a tight game away to the side who finished second last season. Again, I think people are overreacting to one bad performance because they didn't like Mourinho/his style to start with.
… If Spurs have any title ambitions this is a game they should be winning.
It's a game we should be at least getting a point from, but to say we should be winning it or else we have no title ambitions is a bit extreme. City only got a draw away to Wolves.
Spurs have scored Zero Goals and had Zero points at Old Trafford since Potch too over. It's not their game to lose.
I don't think people are overreacting at all.
For me it's not even the Brighton result that that bothers. The signs of a poor season precede it.
If Spurs have any title ambitions this is a game they should be winning.
We don't really have title ambitions .. at least not serious ones, top four will be the realistic aim for the season. Even if you're having a poor season it's still a very tough away game at a ground where few pick up 3 points, and one we've consistently struggled at. A point would be great for us away from home.
How can you not have title ambitions??
By being realistic. We don't have the squad for it, how exactly are we expected to make up that gap on City? Liverpool also spent big this summer, it will be hard to compete.
Of course everybody wants to win the title, but our expectation for the season is top four, so with that being the case I'm not going to be annoyed if we draw at Old Trafford.
If Spurs come for a point, I think they will get it.
The only way I can see United winning this game is if Spurs offer a lot of attacking ambition, allowing for Jose to make use of his counter-attacking strategy that tends to work well against the bigger teams.
The funny thing is I think this is very wrong. Over Mourinho's time here, the times we've scored in big games have been when we were on top and attacking.If Spurs come for a point, I think they will get it.
The only way I can see United winning this game is if Spurs offer a lot of attacking ambition, allowing for Jose to make use of his counter-attacking strategy that tends to work well against the bigger teams.
Not all of us model our English Usage on Jamie RedknappWell you're wrong. "Literally" has been used and accepted as a form of emphasis in this manner for a long time.
I would take out Rashford and put Sanchez in there. Left back is much of muchness from either team. Possibly Matic would get in there too but otherwise, not a lot to argue.
Over Mourinho's time here, the times we've scored in big games have been when we were on top and attacking.
Out results have come when we have gone for it for different reasons at certain periods. Either out of necessity or just playing well. Very few times have we gotten joy out of sitting back simply because for a counter attacking team, our counters are not very good.
- Chelsea. We blew them away in the 2-0 game by being very aggressive. 2-1. We came back strongly in the second half, putting them under pressure after going behind.
- City. Similar to the 2-1 game against Chelsea.
- Spurs. 1-0 game was a drab affair with both team playing crap. 2-1 game was similar the Chelsea game. Tried to soak pressure, concede then change approach.
- Liverpool. Scored two early goals and sat back but pressed high in the first ten minutes.
- Arsenal.blew them away by being ultra aggressive and one of the few times we've pressed very high.
Yep pretty much what I'd do. I'd like to say Martial if he played like he did in his first season or first half of last season, but unlikely.Davies is a good left back. If Matic and Son are available I'd have them both in over Dembele/Rashford, then have Sanchez just behind Kane?
I can't see us Changing our approach, even for a few games. A manager like Mourinho, with all his experience is going to live and die by his ideas.That's a well written summary.
I wonder if Carrick/McKenna suggest that we go more attacking, for a series of 5 or so games, just to see if we get better results?
When Giggs was with LVG, I felt that Giggs did not offer ideas to LVG, which were implemented. In otherwords, we were not seeing the attacking style of play which Giggs had used under Fergie for 20+ years.
In the same way, I am seeing that Carrick/McKenna don't appear to have made any change to our style of play.
We need 2 midfielders behind pogba or they will dominate us there.
3-1 to United and for us to go on a run
If Spurs win. United will already be 6 points behind Spurs, Liverpool & Chelsea
Combined with the negative feeling around the club, think Mourinho may be sacked?
Wouldn't completely shock me. But hopefully a non issue
I went for us to win 1-0 on the caf score predictor. Now expect us to lose because I swear every single time, I predict us to win on the caf predictor, we always lose/draw. We just never seem to win!
Here's hoping for the jinx to end tomorrow once and for all!
Craig Pawson