Fracture90
Full Member
It's unnecessary, just like the part in bold which is just a weird thing to say on a discussion forum about someone you don't know. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't give you the right to call them naive.
For example, I think you're incredibly naive to only blame it on the system (I don't but you get why my saying it is completely pointless and unecessary).
How is someone making assumptions regarding someone on a online forum based on their words, deemed weird?
Are you even sure what are you arguing? You're free to believe whatever you want, but we employ the same system with or without Pogba and I called you naive because you believe City's ability to play without their best players is more down to them having quality replacements (bear in mind Silva is playing way out of position in order to replace KDB) and not to them having a formidable system, considering that they've always played the same way, with or without their besy players.
You could have done that and I wouldn't make any fuss over that, because calling someone naive isn't really enough to get that defensive.