Yes I have.
Regarding the state of the team that Moyes left, we spent the bare minimum under both LVG and Mourinho to keep us relevant. Chelsea and City were already having a pretty good team that needed few adjustments once Fergie left. We on the other hand had a squad full of old players retiring and deadwood.
The squad Moyes left witnessed Rio, Vidic, Evra, Giggs leaving or retiring, Scholes already retired, Rooney was starting his decline, Carrick was aging and RVP was back to his injures. Almost all players that Fergie was depending on were aging, declining or retiring. Away from these the squad was full of deadwood.
Thus we spent the bare minimum to cover for all these weaknesses everywhere. Like seriously, what were you expecting ? Of course having Cleverly, Carrick and Anderson as your choices in midfield would have pushed you to sign 2-3 midfielders to keep it any relevant. What's the achievement in this ? Same for the attack and almost all areas of the pitch.
That can't be said for Chelsea or City for example who kept their backbone through these years and never looked like they need a complete overhaul like we looked like after Moyes left. They looked like they needed this and this in such positions and they'll be sorted. We on the other hand had a complete mess and were forced to spend otherwise we would have been turned to the new Everton thanks to the squad Moyes left.
So nah I stand by my words, we spent but spent the bare minimum to keep us relevant among the top 6 teams.