I couldn't agreee more. I think we were short sighted. I think Fergie was helped in ways not often discussed when the class of 92 were at his disposal. We should of seen it coming and just owned the prem eara..unfortunately that wasn't too be me I've sat and watched you dominate English football for most of my adult life.
I do feel that Rawkites (and they annoy me as well) are slated by your fan base for their sense of entitlement. If you can't see that in your fan base then your short sighted. Your not what you were and you've made 2 terrible managerial appointments. You've backed that up with the obvious appointment..is he what he was..I'm not so sure...
Yep you may win the league..you may stuff us 0-3 tomorrow but he amount of people on here that seem to think because of who you are and the coin you have that it's a given...all of a sudden your us..massive team with loads of history..back amongst the rest.
Hard work isn't it
I wouldn't deny we have a sense of entitlement, in fact I think its essential to the club. I actually think Moyes and Van Gaal did too much to destroy the aura of the club, and I think its wise of Mourinho to get the players and fans thinking of what happened before the last three years. Players and supporters of Man Utd should understand what the club demands.
As I said, what happened to yours is your self-confidence drained away. You got too accustomed to losing and too used to doubting yourselves. It became okay to draw at Anfield, whereas in your pomp you lot won at home and drew away. That's just how Liverpool did it. Getting a result at Anfield, which I'd like to add was a bit of a United speciality even when you lot were
really Liverpool, was a nightmare for most teams. They'd look at yours touching the 'This is Anfield' sign and be defeated in the tunnel.
Somewhere in the mid 90s that 'This is Anfield' mentality died. Yours saw what United were doing and it started making you doubt yourselves. A debate began among your ex-player pundits about the Liverpool way, which is partly why there was so much hope for the Spice Boys because they were seen as the last embers of a dying light. As soon as that Evans/Houllier joint manager stuff started they could tell it was over.
You can't fake that 'This is Anfield' stuff or United's 'Believe' Fergie time attitude. That's why I said that Spice Boys stuff still struck me as white suited bravado. I never felt, even from that group of players, even with Fowler at his best, that they really believed before a game that they
had to win. Yeah, they always wanted to win, but there was always a sense that expectations had been lowered. It was okay to draw. It was okay to lose valiantly, to put in a good performance, to show they were back on the right track. On the contrary when you lot were you lot, you expected to win, and your players knew you had to win. Liverpool won games. That was just the way of thinking. They could score through Rush and then play back passes all game. Didn't matter. Liverpool won games. Playing nice football and losing wasn't enough.
That's what I have hated most about the Moyes and Van Gaal eras. Talking about 'making it hard for Newcastle', talking about 'fans expectations being too high'. When players hear that it affects their thinking. On some level words like 'transition' become excuses for not winning, and the longer that goes on the less anyone remembers what expecting to win was actually like.
Jose's salvaged that situation before: At Porto, at Inter, at Madrid (Chelsea was different cos they'd never really won anything before him, so they couldn't forget how to win). I trust him to do it now. Although I admit, if he doesn't manage to fix it then we're in a bit of a bind, because the last two managers almost totally wrecked our winning mentality. Moyes talking about aspiring to City's level FFS...