Joga_Bonito
Full Member
That's perfectly fine, but then all that you have is you own subjective impression which has been shown time and again, and in numerous ways, to be fundamentally flawed.Those stats don't tell you much. I see a very limited player and I call it that way. Don't need stat percentages to tell me whether he's good or bad.
Without something to ground that impression in reality (such as statistics or logic), your opinion is no more valid or worthy of consideration than my impression that Gibson is the best player in history.
How are you going to show that I am wrong without reference to any statistics or argument?