Well that's fair. I am probably just tired of Rasmus getting blamed for everything. You even have people now claiming he is the reason for Rashfords dip in form.
He was.
You said it right - he is a striker who runs the channels.
So how does that effect the inverted forwards?
Everyone blames the inverted forwards for not creating chances for Hojlund but hardly anyone talks about Hojlunds ability to bring other players in to play especially from out wide.
He is shit at it & it 100% effected Rashford that he had to play more with Hojlund (as you said a running the channel striker) than say Martial who plays different to Hojlund in many ways. Better hold up play, better first touch, better with his back to goal, can play very good passes and through balls to other forwards - Rasmus showed none of these things in comparison to Martial.
It's not just a one way thing. Rashford was shit for Hojlund but Hojlund was just as shit for Rashford.
And so far as history goes, Rashford's the better player so I'm more likely to blame Hojlund not getting the best out of Rashford than Rashford not getting the best out of Hojlund.