Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,740
If the biggest thing you can shout about from you home league is your club has a good ownership model, speaks volumes about the interest.

we get it there is a lot of green eyes on what the premier league has become, carry on.
 

hellhunter

Eurofighter
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
18,281
Location
Stuttgart, Germany
Supports
Karlsruher SC
Well, I wasn't on this forum when that takeover happened, but this isn't the point here anyway. The point is that lots and lots of people here on this forum werent't shy to offer their opinions about the owners of other clubs, and you know that.
There are also a lot of opinionated people about a potential Qatar takeover, to be fair. Feels like a lot just accepted the inevitable, that doesn't mean they welcome it
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,581
To be fair you were here about 18 months ago when we were stopping games in protest of the Glazers?
Or every season where we pay interest, they take dividends, etc.
Or when they even took dividends in covid season …
Now they are acting as if they joined the forum just a few weeks or months ago :lol:
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,879
Location
Manchester
To be fair you were here about 18 months ago when we were stopping games in protest of the Glazers?
There are also a lot of opinionated people about a potential Qatar takeover, to be fair. Feels like a lot just accepted the inevitable, that doesn't mean they welcome it
Or every season where we pay interest, they take dividends, etc.
Or when they even took dividends in covid season …
Now they are acting as if they joined the forum just a few weeks or months ago :lol:
correct
 

Adebisi's Hat

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
796
Location
Out Wesht
Supports
who do you feckin think ?
I agree with Dove, where were Amnesty when the Saudis took over Newcstle etc etc ? I even heard that fecking Greenpeace are on growling about Sir Jim. There is great publicity mileage to being linked with Utd in any way, so i expect plenty more bluffers to come out of the woodwork to give their opinion.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...chester-united-jim-ratcliffe-glazers-26038425

For me Amnesty and Greenpeace can bugger off back to Davos with their globalist agendas.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
6,604
At this point I no longer care, US consortium or ME state, just give me owners who won't force our manager to sign Burnley strikers on loan or make him pick between a forward, a midfielder and a defender and instead give him all three.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
36,028
At this point I no longer care, US consortium or ME state, just give me owners who won't force our manager to sign Burnley strikers on loan or make him pick between a forward, a midfielder and a defender and instead give him all three.
I can't get on board with US consortium because of Glazer flashbacks,just cannot separate the two things in my eyes,now you have Ratcliffe getting JP Morgan involved with buying this club AGAIN
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,354
Location
Ireland
Bloomberg article about Radcliffe was updated to say the banks prepared to back the offer with bonds and loans and are willing to cover the value of United’s debt.
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,630
I agree with Dove, where were Amnesty when the Saudis took over Newcstle etc etc ? I even heard that fecking Greenpeace are on growling about Sir Jim. There is great publicity mileage to being linked with Utd in any way, so i expect plenty more bluffers to come out of the woodwork to give their opinion.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...chester-united-jim-ratcliffe-glazers-26038425

For me Amnesty and Greenpeace can bugger off back to Davos with their globalist agendas.
fecking hell, a takeover hasn't even happened and we've got people on here slagging off Amnesty International and Greenpeace because all that matters is that United might sign Mbappe.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,879
Location
Manchester
Bloomberg article about Radcliffe was updated to say the banks prepared to back the offer with bonds and loans and are willing to cover the value of United’s debt.
Excellent

So debt will be cleared whichever owners e we end to (seems very likely)
 

Adebisi's Hat

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
796
Location
Out Wesht
Supports
who do you feckin think ?
fecking hell, a takeover hasn't even happened and we've got people on here slagging off Amnesty International and Greenpeace because all that matters is that United might sign Mbappe.
Mbappe can bugger off too........ :lol:
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
36,028
If he wants to make people feel confident about him running things then it needs an article outlining his plans for infrastructure and stadium changes. Like we have seen from Qatari's in Mike Keegan's articles
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,991
Location
France
I agree with Dove, where were Amnesty when the Saudis took over Newcstle etc etc ? I even heard that fecking Greenpeace are on growling about Sir Jim;

https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...chester-united-jim-ratcliffe-glazers-26038425

For me Amnesty and Greenpeace can bugger off back to Davos with their globalist agendas.
Amnesty International communicated about United? The only thing I see is someone having a look at their report about Qatar, they have a report about pretty much all countries and none of them sound positive because by definition Amnesty International focuses on what countries do wrong.

As an example this is the UK and here you have a good student in Sweden. One of the issue with AI reports isn't the content or AI but the fact that people try to weaponize them out of context.
 

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
36,218
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
fecking hell, a takeover hasn't even happened and we've got people on here slagging off Amnesty International and Greenpeace because all that matters is that United might sign Mbappe.
Amnesty International communicated about United? The only thing I see is someone having a look at their report about Qatar, they have a report about pretty much all countries and none of them sound positive because by definition Amnesty International focuses on what countries do wrong.

As an example this is the UK and here you have a good student in Sweden. One of the issue with AI reports isn't the content or AI but the fact that people try to weaponize them out of context.
It's gonna be a very strange period.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,528
Amnesty International communicated about United? The only thing I see is someone having a look at their report about Qatar, they have a report about pretty much all countries and none of them sound positive because by definition Amnesty International focuses on what countries do wrong.

As an example this is the UK and here you have a good student in Sweden. One of the issue with AI reports isn't the content or AI but the fact that people try to weaponize them out of context.

Been on sky as well as other news outlets Amnesty international, wake up call for premier league and FA fit and proper owners test etc...
 

711

Amadinho is the goat
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,539
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
Bloomberg article about Radcliffe was updated to say the banks prepared to back the offer with bonds and loans and are willing to cover the value of United’s debt.
Excellent
So debt will be cleared whichever owners e we end to (seems very likely)
But bonds and loans need to be repaid, so wouldn't that just be a case of rescheduling the debt rather than paying it off, or have I misunderstood?
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,816
Location
Blitztown
Why exactly are we seemingly supporting the tax dodging, pro-fracking, Brexiteer?

The man pushed through Brexit and promptly moved to Monaco.

He’s just a different flavour of Cnut.
 

Kinsella

Copy & Paste Merchant
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
2,954
The club has its identity set in stone. It is one of the biggest sporting institutions in the world. Having an owner from the ME changes nothing.
It obviously changes something if so many fans feel that way.
 
Last edited:

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,991
Location
France
Why exactly are we seemingly supporting the tax dodging, pro-fracking, Brexiteer?

The man pushed through Brexit and promptly moved to Monaco.

He’s just a different flavour of Cnut.
Read that again and realize where you went wrong. :lol:
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,968
At this point I no longer care, US consortium or ME state, just give me owners who won't force our manager to sign Burnley strikers on loan or make him pick between a forward, a midfielder and a defender and instead give him all three.
Lord give me strength……..
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,879
Location
Manchester
So Ineos would want extra dividends to repay 'their' debt. United would still be paying for it. Ineos want to make money, not give it away.
Is that what it says or are you assume?

Clearlake are in 800m of debt to fund Chelsea and look at them
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,354
Location
Ireland
So Ineos would want extra dividends to repay 'their' debt. United would still be paying for it. Ineos want to make money, not give it away.
INEOS currently have north or €6b in debt I believe. Debt isn’t inherently bad for companies like these.
 

thebelfastboy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
879
Location
Belfast
There is a significant and important distinction in how these bids would be financed:

Qatar will basically have the money to hand to enable the purchase which means they won't be tied to any debt/interest repayments and will be happy for a return in the long run having increased the value of the club.

SJR on the other hand is approaching JP, Sachs etc to confirm that they will finance the bid. This in effect will most likely lump absolutely incredible amounts of debt on the club that will need to be repaid.

It will be like the Glazer takeover on steroids.
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,354
Location
Ireland
There is a significant and important distinction in how these bids would be financed:

Qatar will basically have the money to hand to enable the purchase which means they won't be tied to any debt/interest repayments and will be happy for a return in the long run having increased the value of the club.

SJR on the other hand is approaching JP, Sachs etc to confirm that they will finance the bid. This in effect will most likely lump absolutely incredible amounts of debt on the club that will need to be repaid.

It will be like the Glazer takeover on steroids.
That’s absolutely not what’s happening with Radcliffe :lol:
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,665
Location
...
I personally just don't care too much about who the owners are. Owners of football clubs have become such big topics, back in the day I barely knew who owned who. I never even really cared much about the Glazers. I know what a Glazer is and I know that I've always been told that I'm supposed to hate them, so kinda have, but not with any real conviction I must say. I can't say I've ever been massively offended at the fact that they 'take dividends' or whatever - they own the fecking football club I was never outraged at them 'taking money out of it'. Ultimately, from my own perspective of just giving a shit about the football, I've seen us spend a lot of money, I've seen us all celebrate many a transfer 'victory' over in the transfer forum, often for record fees. If asked to write a theses, I'd probably paint them badly, but in reality, I barely give a shit. I just want us to be able to have the necessary money to compete in and around the top of the game, after that - I have no interest in who owns the club if I'm being honest with myself. I'm aware that Villa currently have minted owners but I couldn't tell you who they were or the first thing about them.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
36,028
There is a significant and important distinction in how these bids would be financed:

Qatar will basically have the money to hand to enable the purchase which means they won't be tied to any debt/interest repayments and will be happy for a return in the long run having increased the value of the club.

SJR on the other hand is approaching JP, Sachs etc to confirm that they will finance the bid. This in effect will most likely lump absolutely incredible amounts of debt on the club that will need to be repaid.

It will be like the Glazer takeover on steroids.
Anything that makes us liable for a debt should be an absolute no-no after all the Glazer shite
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Why exactly are we seemingly supporting the tax dodging, pro-fracking, Brexiteer?

The man pushed through Brexit and promptly moved to Monaco.

He’s just a different flavour of Cnut.
Find me a billionaire who isn't. The. Find me one who isn't who wants to buy a football club that is worth 7bn.

Hint: You won't be able to.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,638
Location
left wing
There is a significant and important distinction in how these bids would be financed:

Qatar will basically have the money to hand to enable the purchase which means they won't be tied to any debt/interest repayments and will be happy for a return in the long run having increased the value of the club.

SJR on the other hand is approaching JP, Sachs etc to confirm that they will finance the bid. This in effect will most likely lump absolutely incredible amounts of debt on the club that will need to be repaid.

It will be like the Glazer takeover on steroids.
You are going to need to provide a source for this wild accusation! Where has it been written than Ineos plan to load United's balance sheet with debt? Please say you haven't just made this up...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.