Bernardo Silva possibly?Who did he get instead of Mbappe?
Bernardo Silva possibly?Who did he get instead of Mbappe?
Could be, didn't get one Monaco gem so took another.Bernardo Silva possibly?
There are plenty of reasons to mock City, but I don't think this is one of them. Every club does the "we didn't want him anyway" briefing when they know they're beaten (see us after Griezmann pulled out of the deal in the summer). On the other hand, this is great news; seems like he's almost certainly ours now.The good old "we didn't want him anyway" City briefing, to save face.
Knobhead club.
Where will Malcolm play? In the middle?
I would take him for free or a small fee.No thanks.
Is it contract renewal time again? I always thought contract renewals would be once in two years. Now it seems it happens every 6 months.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
feck offTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If he takes a free transfer then why not, but it does not make financial sense to get him for 100 million euros.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Nice if him to tell AS that, but we don't need him, I am sure PSG or the Americans will love him though.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Even Pep wouldn't play that team. I meant you should know he prefers more midfielders and attackers with play maker ability own pure forward. Sanchez is the most creative yet he was not all that at Barcelona under Pep. Lukaku and Ronaldo would drive Pep nut trying to employ his team. Martial is up to debate as personal opinion differs. IMO Martial ain't moving that well off ball for Pep liking, something Pep is rumored to critical about Aguero when Pep took over.I would take him for free or a small fee.
A Ronaldo Lukaku Sanchez Attack would be frightening
Matic Pogba
Sanchez Martial
Lukaku Ronaldo
We would obviously be destroyed on the counter as the team is unbalanced, it looks more like a team Guardiola would put out.
Not that it's going to happen, Ronaldo will be linked with us as long as he's still playing.
For the Fee, Wages, Signing On Bonus and his recent decline, It would be a terrible deal for us.I’d still take him. Preposterous to turn him down.
Can't even do it in a pub league anymore, hard pass.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
100% this. Ship has sailed long time ago.No thanks.
Not this againTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Great to see this reaction. Exactly. I hope I don’t live to regret this, but noMost obvious 'I want a contract extension' ever. Sorry Ronnie, but we've moved on.
That’s an absolutely shocking nickname they’ve got for him. It’s like the ones Trump has made up for his enemies like Sloppy Steve Bannon or Crooked Hillary Clinton.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
?That’s an absolutely shocking nickname they’ve got for him. It’s like the ones Trump has made up for his enemies like Sloppy Steve Bannon or Crooked Hillary Clinton.
“Cristiano Quiere Irse”. I don’t know how they get away with it.
I think it's because of how it sounds phonetically
As long as he doesn't age suddenly... come on in.No thanks.
City accepting defeat? Oh no, they take moral high ground
Even if it goes on for another day, it's been what a 4 day saga? It's barely any time at all. So many nervous nelly's on here.If everything had been agreed with everyone then I don't know why it's taking so long to announce it, this could rumble on for another day or so I reckon with City coming back in and upping their offer, on the back of one bad result.
Don’t want. We need to continue building towards future, with players willing to work hard and play for the team. With CR7, it will always be the team playing for him. RM is in trouble with an ageing and increasingly ineffective BBC on very expensive and long term contracts, I hope we don’t bail them out.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date