Alexis Sanchez | Done deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tapori

Full Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
2,397
Location
Manchester - South Side
Just a thought, with us being branded laughing stocks in the market largely for the last 5 years (remember fellaini deadline day farce and herrera secret agent stuff) signing Pogba, Matic, Lukaku, and (touch wood(ward)) Sanchez, the question is when are pundits/journos going to acknowledge the clubs obvious intent and overhauling of our transfer policy? They hate it. They hate it because they thought we were done. They thought we had had our fair share and now it was someone else's turn and now they're all devastated because it's clear we are going nowhere. If this transfer happens it will be a complete eye opener and will just go to show that sometimes having a blank cheque doesn't matter. Sometimes players will choose the badge. They all hate it and it makes me love it even more
This.
 

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,915
Location
Melbz
At 30m this is a bargain. Buying a player of this level with more years on the contract would be 100m+. Really smart business to recruit a great player in a position we need (assuming he will play RW mostly) at that price and leaving us with more funds for our summer plans. Also, having an experienced and proven top level forward I think will help take the pressure of younger guys like Martial, Lukaku, Rashford etc. Scuppering City's move for him is nice too :D
 

Tapori

Full Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
2,397
Location
Manchester - South Side
Perfectly put. Rashford is at best a bench player. I would almost consider him to be/ reach Pedro's level when he was at Barcelona and he had Messi, Sanchez, David Villa start ahead of him. He will have very good games but he will go missing in a lot of them. His decision making is really poor. There are times when Lukaku should have had an easy tap in and Rashford has chosen to dribble more than required or taken a shot which heads to the stands. His biggest asset is his pace. He really needs to step up if he wants to be picked.
No way; Rashford in his short time has shown guile, his form like any young player is up-and-down. This idea that he's simply a speed merchant and always will be is an insult to Mourinho and him. He needs time to develop and we'll\be better for it.
 

Fridge chutney

Do your best.
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
9,044
Below is being widely reported. Someone should tweet it to Ballague, before pointing out that Sanchez snubbed Pep, Money, all for "childhood dreams".

Alexis Sanchez 'dreamed' about playing for Man United when he was younger, according to his Chile team-mate
 

Betson

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
2,322
What's happened in the last 9 hours? City pull out?
Anybody willing to sum it up?
Seemingly the press have it that City are out and will now look elsewhere and Sanchez will join us within the next 48 hours.

But in this business nothing is certain until it is signed and sealed , but looking good.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
131,093
Location
Hollywood CA
Seemingly the press have it that City are out and will now look elsewhere and Sanchez will join us with the next 48 hours.

But in this business nothing is certain until it is signed and sealed , but looking good.
I'm guessing we will hear something definitive by end of day tomorrow. Wenger suggested within 48 hours so that makes sense.
 

Get In Scholesy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
4,073
Location
The Plains of Nineveh
Just a thought, with us being branded laughing stocks in the market largely for the last 5 years (remember fellaini deadline day farce and herrera secret agent stuff) signing Pogba, Matic, Lukaku, and (touch wood(ward)) Sanchez, the question is when are pundits/journos going to acknowledge the clubs obvious intent and overhauling of our transfer policy? They hate it. They hate it because they thought we were done. They thought we had had our fair share and now it was someone else's turn and now they're all devastated because it's clear we are going nowhere. If this transfer happens it will be a complete eye opener and will just go to show that sometimes having a blank cheque doesn't matter. Sometimes players will choose the badge. They all hate it and it makes me love it even more

I truly enjoyed reading this post. We really see how hated we are, even during our mediocrity. It’s kind of enjoyable.
 

Swift Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2017
Messages
882
The real question is whether we'll finally play a more fluid front 3. No way Sanchez is being brought to supply crosses for Lukaku or hug the touchline.

I see worries about where Rashford will play but if this signing makes Jose rethink our tactics, then Martial and Rashford could finally be played closer to goal
No, we wont play a fluid front 3 because we are much more stronger playing more traditional forward- who likes to bury the goal rather than "interchanging" and exciting the crowd only to send the ball into the stands. Sanchez will most likely play behind lukaku.

You mentioned crosses to Lukaku and hugging the touchline as something we should not do. That is one thing our team is missing, a winger who hugs the touchline and stretches the opponents and sends dangerous crosses in. That is one reason why Young has flourished so much recently. Sanchez is different style of player than line hugging winger, and would not provide those attributes but somebody in the squad should do that more regularly(maybe fullbacks).

I think Rashford and Martial need extra competition to make a step up. Surely, they have progressed a lot from last season, but having Sanchez will help them grow as well as provide more competition which is good for us. They both are very direct players and when we are missing Pogba in the games, we are lacking in creativity, which Sanchez will provide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Penna

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,221
The incompetence of Arsenal is staggering. They could have sold him for big money last summer and reinvested that money on someone else who'd had have the time to settle in the club. Instead they're losing a top player in January while things are going wrong for them on the pitch.

I'd be fuming if I were an Arsenal fan.
 

spwd

likes: servals, breasts, rylan clark and zooey
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
8,965
Location
Lyecestershyre
Just a thought, with us being branded laughing stocks in the market largely for the last 5 years (remember fellaini deadline day farce and herrera secret agent stuff) signing Pogba, Matic, Lukaku, and (touch wood(ward)) Sanchez, the question is when are pundits/journos going to acknowledge the clubs obvious intent and overhauling of our transfer policy? They hate it. They hate it because they thought we were done. They thought we had had our fair share and now it was someone else's turn and now they're all devastated because it's clear we are going nowhere. If this transfer happens it will be a complete eye opener and will just go to show that sometimes having a blank cheque doesn't matter. Sometimes players will choose the badge. They all hate it and it makes me love it even more
Well said bud, well said!
 

Karlkim SK

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
65
No, we wont play a fluid front 3 because we are much more stronger playing more traditional forward- who likes to bury the goal rather than "interchanging" and exciting the crowd only to send the ball into the stands. Sanchez will most likely play behind lukaku.

You mentioned crosses to Lukaku and hugging the touchline as something we should not do. That is one thing our team is missing, a winger who hugs the touchline and stretches the opponents and sends dangerous crosses in. That is one reason why Young has flourished so much recently. Sanchez is different style of player than line hugging winger, and would not provide those attributes but somebody in the squad should do that more regularly(maybe fullbacks).

I think Rashford and Martial need extra competition to make a step up. Surely, they have progressed a lot from last season, but having Sanchez will help them grow as well as provide more competition which is good for us. They both are very direct players and when we are missing Pogba in the games, we are lacking in creativity, which Sanchez will provide.
I think that is why I like us getting Sanchez as he can play either LW, No. 10, or RW. He is strong and fast and can run/press a lot. He can also hold the ball which should free up Lukaku to score more goals.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,835
If this happens, it'll mean that we won't go after Bale etc in the summer which will only mean money saved for us. Also Sanchez doesn't have a WC to go this summer, he can have a nice pre season rest.
 

Scholsey2004

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
3,611
it depends on where we are going from, assuming we sign Dybala/Griezmann who will play on right wings and behind a striker or new CM to partner with Pogba and Matic in 433, Ozil looks like he'll sign for us in summer. Ozil is more effective on the right than he'd be on left in 433 and.

in 4-2-3-1 with Dybala/Griezmann, Mhki, Mata, Ozil and Sanchez can play as RW.

Dybala/Griezmann, Mhki, Ozil, Mata, Sanchez and Lingard can play as SS/ACM.

Rashford, Martial, Lingard and Sanchez can play on left.

Considering Lukaku may be untouchable so Rashford, Martial and Sanchez would be a replacement for Lukaku as 9 strikers if needed rest or injured.

Martial, Rashford, Lukaku, Dybala, Griezmann and Sanchez can play as a striker/false 9.

That would increase a depth of our attacking option in the squad, stronger and more competition for a position.
Not convinced we'll be after griezmann any more, especially if we get sanchez. Dybala maybe but you could argue if we got Sanchez and ozil then we don't need another top attacker and at this point its very possible we will get both.
 

tekkers3

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
225

bleedred

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
5,825
Location
404
The incompetence of Arsenal is staggering. They could have sold him for big money last summer and reinvested that money on someone else who'd had have the time to settle in the club. Instead they're losing a top player in January while things are going wrong for them on the pitch.

I'd be fuming if I were an Arsenal fan.
They are. But it’s been constantly happening, they have been selling their best players for years now.
 

The Don

Metrosexual Candy Shagger
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
12,908
Location
Dayman, ahhhahhhahh, fighter of the nightman
If this happens, it'll mean that we won't go after Bale etc in the summer which will only mean money saved for us. Also Sanchez doesn't have a WC to go this summer, he can have a nice pre season rest.
That's a fair point. Going after the likes of Bale/Dybala/Griezmann etc. is gonna cost upwards of 100m. Money that can be well spent on other areas of the squad.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,640
Di Marzio broke yet another amazing story with this, the guy is a transfer legend.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,835
That's a fair point. Going after the likes of Bale/Dybala/Griezmann etc. is gonna cost upwards of 100m. Money that can be well spent on other areas of the squad.
Yup. I imagine the likes of Bale/Dybala etc wouldn't take any less wages than Sanchez so that's completely negated. The fees here is likely to around 30m ish which is 1/3rd of what it'll take to land Bale/Dybala/Griezmann. The only thing possibly we're paying extra is signing on fee but that's a very minimal difference.
 

Scholsey2004

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
3,611
The incompetence of Arsenal is staggering. They could have sold him for big money last summer and reinvested that money on someone else who'd had have the time to settle in the club. Instead they're losing a top player in January while things are going wrong for them on the pitch.

I'd be fuming if I were an Arsenal fan.
They could easily lose ozil in the same way as well. Ramsey's contract runs out at the end of next season.
 

BarstoolProphet

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,758
If this happens, it'll mean that we won't go after Bale etc in the summer which will only mean money saved for us. Also Sanchez doesn't have a WC to go this summer, he can have a nice pre season rest.
This. Using Rawkonomics the net spend for this transfer is actually -£50m considering we would have spunked £80m on Bale in the summer and he would have been injured until 2083 anyway. Well done Woody!
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
The incompetence of Arsenal is staggering. They could have sold him for big money last summer and reinvested that money on someone else who'd had have the time to settle in the club. Instead they're losing a top player in January while things are going wrong for them on the pitch.

I'd be fuming if I were an Arsenal fan.
The only reason I can think of is if they sold last summer they had to spend much more due to fan's demand. Now it's only months away till the contract end and they ain'tdoing well, so recoup some money and get cheaper replacements (compare the money for quality player like Alexis and Ozil in normal circumstance) is better than losing them for nothing. Not very convincing reason but I think they can dupe part of the fan base.
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,842
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Another thing he'll add to the side is that willingness to take the ball under pressure. Pogba is pretty much the only player we have at the moment that is confident with opposition in and around him.
 

prateik

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
42,272
Comparing Di Marzio to Ballbag :lol:
Di Marzio is probably the closest to a sure thing.. The ones more reliable would probably be BBC(not the gossip section), who dont usually break stories... or the clubs website.
 

GM K

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
4,601
For the first time, I actually agree with the salty bastard.

I would explode if our manager sold our best players to a PL rival time after time like that.
But it happens really.

Mata to United.
Matic to United
Cech to Arsenal
RVP to United
Sterling to City
Torres to Chelsea
Cole to Chelsea
Galas to Arsenal
Etc.

I think it's not a big deal if the conditions are right. And rather than lose good players abroad, top teams should be a bit more open to doing business in the EPL, again, if the conditions are right.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,101
No, we wont play a fluid front 3 because we are much more stronger playing more traditional forward- who likes to bury the goal rather than "interchanging" and exciting the crowd only to send the ball into the stands. Sanchez will most likely play behind lukaku.

You mentioned crosses to Lukaku and hugging the touchline as something we should not do. That is one thing our team is missing, a winger who hugs the touchline and stretches the opponents and sends dangerous crosses in. That is one reason why Young has flourished so much recently. Sanchez is different style of player than line hugging winger, and would not provide those attributes but somebody in the squad should do that more regularly(maybe fullbacks).

I think Rashford and Martial need extra competition to make a step up. Surely, they have progressed a lot from last season, but having Sanchez will help them grow as well as provide more competition which is good for us. They both are very direct players and when we are missing Pogba in the games, we are lacking in creativity, which Sanchez will provide.
Obviously I'm not the manager but I don't think playing a traditional forward system should be a long term strength if Lukaku is said forward. Imo our style of play has needed an overhaul for a while but the smart reason for sticking with it was it supposedly played to the strengths of Lukaku and also that we didn't have the quality of players to make it work.

Actually hadn't considered the possibility that we keep our current system and play Sanchez behind the striker. Felt bringing Martial closer to Sanchez and Lukaku in a front 3 would benefit our attacking play. A front three doesn't need positional interchanging by the way. Depends on the manager's styleAlso agree that we need width to stretch play but that should be the jobs of the fullbacks.

Another reason for an overhaul is that we don't have any pure wingers at the club so why continue to use a system that plugs square pegs in round holes.

Our current setup crams a ton of inefficiencies eg Martial/Rashford (wide forwards) playing as wide midfielders, Pogba (advanced playmaking midfielder playing as a deep playmaker), Lukaku (technically limited poacher being used as targetman). Signing Sanchez should represent an opportunity to fix it. Would be stubbornness not to at least explore other options
 

M4nu4Life

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
425
If we sign him does he play on the right or as a number 10??

Ideally on the right until we sign a new winger.
 

Mr Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
4,030
Location
Australia
At 30m this is a bargain. Buying a player of this level with more years on the contract would be 100m+. Really smart business to recruit a great player in a position we need (assuming he will play RW mostly) at that price and leaving us with more funds for our summer plans. Also, having an experienced and proven top level forward I think will help take the pressure of younger guys like Martial, Lukaku, Rashford etc. Scuppering City's move for him is nice too :D
I agree, this will be a dream signing if it goes through. Sanchez is comfortably among the 5 or 6 players best players in the league, and we have beaten a main rival to his signature. To get him for 30 mil on top of that is fantastic business.

Added to that, he's that talismanic attacking player we've been crying out for. If we'd signed him at the start of the season I honestly believe we'd be nipping at City's heals right now, a couple of points behind them at worst.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
Di Marzio has been wrong so many times, tho. There's no difference between him or some other fraud like Balague.
:wenger:

Di Marzio when he was wrong, his info still held some ground: a player can have many offer and you can't know for certain what the player think. Sometimes, they can just change their mind at last minute (Paul Gascoigne snubbed SAF for example). All info regarding the contact between all the parties, Di Marzio clearly has reliable source.

Ballbag on the other just made thing up on the go, and pass it as fact. Anyone familiar with his bs can see he change his tune on same subject all the time according to his own agenda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.