Anderson | 2013/14 Performances (on loan at Fiorentina)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
To be fair, he had the amount of potential he did due to his own hard work. It's not like he was just born with an amazing amount of talent.
No but some are born with more than others. He clearly has natural talent. Take Roy Keane for instance. He did not have much natural talent. He was still playing in Ireland at 19. He did what he did in his career from hard work alone. Countless hours carrying up and down kegs to build up his legs, etc. Anderson really just has absolutely no work ethic. It's disappointing.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
Perhaps but I'd imagine he's not the hardest worker there is either. Happy-go-lucky which helps when you're injured a lot but he didn't seem very determined or he wouldn't have been overweight so much.
If you are injured, surely it's your job to keep fit regardless? As a professional footballer, when injured you obviously can't play ball as usual. But there is nothing stopping you hitting the gym and eating right to keep yourself in shape. Some injuries prevent all training but they don't happen too often. You can still eat properly regardless. I think if you are being paid a fortune and it's your job, there is no excuse not to keep yourself in shape.
 

Brightonian

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
14,168
Location
Juanderlust
The fact that we kept him for so long does make me feel oddly better about his departure. It's been frustrating at times, and I know a lot of people will say that we should have got rid sooner, but at least this way I feel like the club has thoroughly fulfilled its own responsibilities. There's nothing knee-jerk or short-termist about the decision. We bought a young player, he had trouble with injuries and with adapting to the team, but we gave him as long as any club could reasonably be expected to give before deciding that it was time to move him on.

It's like a much less extreme version of giving Moyes another year (which is something I'm glad we didn't do, just to be clear.) Yes, it irked at the time and it's probably cost us in a number of ways, but I think it says something good about the club that we stuck with Anderson for so long. It's the opposite of the City approach of buying a player one summer, trying them out, and replacing them with another one the very next summer if they're not an immediate success.
 

shaggy

Prefers blue over red, loathed by Spurs fans
Joined
Jun 16, 2011
Messages
14,936
Location
Man United fan
The fact that we kept him for so long does make me feel oddly better about his departure. It's been frustrating at times, and I know a lot of people will say that we should have got rid sooner, but at least this way I feel like the club has thoroughly fulfilled its own responsibilities. There's nothing knee-jerk or short-termist about the decision. We bought a young player, he had trouble with injuries and with adapting to the team, but we gave him as long as any club could reasonably be expected to give before deciding that it was time to move him on.

It's like a much less extreme version of giving Moyes another year (which is something I'm glad we didn't do, just to be clear.) Yes, it irked at the time and it's probably cost us in a number of ways, but I think it says something good about the club that we stuck with Anderson for so long. It's the opposite of the City approach of buying a player one summer, trying them out, and replacing them with another one the very next summer if they're not an immediate success.
More likely nobody would buy him.
 

Brightonian

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
14,168
Location
Juanderlust
More likely nobody would buy him.
:lol: Well there's that too. Although there've never really been rumours of us putting him on the market. Because after all, there's always someone who'll buy anyone. It's not as if we're the sort of club who cares about getting good money for our rejects.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,964
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
The fact that we kept him for so long does make me feel oddly better about his departure. It's been frustrating at times, and I know a lot of people will say that we should have got rid sooner, but at least this way I feel like the club has thoroughly fulfilled its own responsibilities. There's nothing knee-jerk or short-termist about the decision. We bought a young player, he had trouble with injuries and with adapting to the team, but we gave him as long as any club could reasonably be expected to give before deciding that it was time to move him on.

It's like a much less extreme version of giving Moyes another year (which is something I'm glad we didn't do, just to be clear.) Yes, it irked at the time and it's probably cost us in a number of ways, but I think it says something good about the club that we stuck with Anderson for so long. It's the opposite of the City approach of buying a player one summer, trying them out, and replacing them with another one the very next summer if they're not an immediate success.
Agreed. Likewise Chelsea, selling Matic and buying him back again.
 

Will Absolute

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
7,982
Location
Southern Ireland
The fact that we kept him for so long does make me feel oddly better about his departure. It's been frustrating at times, and I know a lot of people will say that we should have got rid sooner, but at least this way I feel like the club has thoroughly fulfilled its own responsibilities. There's nothing knee-jerk or short-termist about the decision. We bought a young player, he had trouble with injuries and with adapting to the team, but we gave him as long as any club could reasonably be expected to give before deciding that it was time to move him on.

It's like a much less extreme version of giving Moyes another year (which is something I'm glad we didn't do, just to be clear.) Yes, it irked at the time and it's probably cost us in a number of ways, but I think it says something good about the club that we stuck with Anderson for so long. It's the opposite of the City approach of buying a player one summer, trying them out, and replacing them with another one the very next summer if they're not an immediate success.
In fairness, even though I had high hopes when he came and he remained one of my favourite players, and I was always happy to see him on the pitch, I think Fergie stuck with Ando a little too long. :smirk:
 

ravelston

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
2,624
Location
Boston - the one in the States
In fairness, even though I had high hopes when he came and he remained one of my favourite players, and I was always happy to see him on the pitch, I think Fergie stuck with Ando a little too long. :smirk:
Feel the same way. Just wonder if he might be a van Gaal type of player (if he could be motivated to do the work). Good touch, quick, carries the ball well.
 

Brightonian

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
14,168
Location
Juanderlust
Feel the same way. Just wonder if he might be a van Gaal type of player (if he could be motivated to do the work). Good touch, quick, carries the ball well.
But he's gone so badly downhill over the last couple of seasons you could very easily buy someone just as good at those things without even spending that much money. Van Gaal or not, I think he's definitely gone this time.

In fairness, even though I had high hopes when he came and he remained one of my favourite players, and I was always happy to see him on the pitch, I think Fergie stuck with Ando a little too long. :smirk:
Yeah you're definitely right, but as I say I prefer too much patience with players to too little.
 

Nucks

RT History Department
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
4,462
To be fair, he had the amount of potential he did due to his own hard work. It's not like he was just born with an amazing amount of talent.
Actually, you're probably completely wrong on this point. Often times the most naturally talented athletes wash out. It's not a stretch to understand why. They are always just better than anyone else when they are coming up in the youth leagues. This natural talent continues. They don't have to work at it any more than to show up to practice and games.

Eventually they reach a level where just coasting on natural talent isn't enough. The problem then is they are young men and have never had the work ethic required to maximize their performance instilled in them. It's difficult to develop this out of the blue.

Hard work beats talent when talent refuses to work hard. One of my favourite sayings and it is absolutely true.
 

gormless

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
8,580
Location
comfortable and settled in my rut
Actually, you're probably completely wrong on this point. Often times the most naturally talented athletes wash out. It's not a stretch to understand why. They are always just better than anyone else when they are coming up in the youth leagues. This natural talent continues. They don't have to work at it any more than to show up to practice and games.

Eventually they reach a level where just coasting on natural talent isn't enough. The problem then is they are young men and have never had the work ethic required to maximize their performance instilled in them. It's difficult to develop this out of the blue.

Hard work beats talent when talent refuses to work hard. One of my favourite sayings and it is absolutely true.

Define natural talent though. He wasn't born a good footballer. At some point, even if at a very early age, he worked harder than his peers to be better than them at that point in time. I concede your point if you mean simple genetics, e.g. Rooney being stronger than other people age 16 due to his natural build
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,669
Location
Hope, We Lose
Well strength at a young age and speed were two of the things that made Anderson stand out at Gremio/Porto
 

Snowjoe

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,362
Location
Lake Athabasca
Supports
Cheltenham Town
I reckon we offer him £1000p/w to just joke around and keep morale up in the dressing room and take photos on instagram.
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,663
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
If you are injured, surely it's your job to keep fit regardless? As a professional footballer, when injured you obviously can't play ball as usual. But there is nothing stopping you hitting the gym and eating right to keep yourself in shape. Some injuries prevent all training but they don't happen too often. You can still eat properly regardless. I think if you are being paid a fortune and it's your job, there is no excuse not to keep yourself in shape.
That's sort of my point. I don't know how he would have turned out if he wasn't always injured but I imagine his growth wouldn't have been massive (pun not intended) because he doesn't seem to have the professional attitude for it. At the risk of sounding stereotypical, it's very Brazilian of him. Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Robinho and many more are the same way.
 

mic.m

likes to be nude when popping out baked brownies
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
3,857
Location
land of milfs and honeys
I have no sympathy for him. I don't care about his personality. It's clear that it wasn't just injuries that held him back. Fergie indulged him for far too long.
 

simonhch

Horrible boss
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
14,919
Location
Seventh Heaven
Supports
Urban Combat Preparedness
Deserves one more chance at United. I think next season could really be his year under Van Gaal.

Bite?
 

Distracted Steward

Full Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2014
Messages
1,405
Location
Texas
Definitely wasn't rash to loan him out and start the process to move him on. I know he had his struggles with injury, but we can all say he just didn't do his part. If he couldn't force his way into the midfield at this ebb, when would he ever? Time to go. Shame, though. He had the makings of a much, much better player than he turned out to be.
 
Last edited:

Lu Tze

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2012
Messages
3,296
No player has ever had so many chances and done so little with them. Get. Rid.
 

pascell

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
14,459
Location
Sir Alex Ferguson Stand
I can't think of anything he has improved on over the 7 years at the club. Sadly, this is the way it goes for some players. I'm pretty sure he'll be part of the clear out.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,665
What now for Ando? Seems Fiorentina aren't keen on buying him - and who can blame them? His injury problems seemingly won't go away and he's hardly started for them.

Can't help but feeling sorry for the poor bastard.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,287
Location
Not Moskva
What now for Ando? Seems Fiorentina aren't keen on buying him - and who can blame them? His injury problems seemingly won't go away and he's hardly started for them.

Can't help but feeling sorry for the poor bastard.
When does his contract run out? Surely United won't have him back for season no. 8. Give him away on a free to some lesser side in Brazil or Portugal? Possibly pound for pound the worst signing of the Fergie era, although that judgement is with the benefit of hindsight as he was regarded as hugely promising as a teenager.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,964
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
When does his contract run out? Surely United won't have him back for season no. 8. Give him away on a free to some lesser side in Brazil or Portugal? Possibly pound for pound the worst signing of the Fergie era, although that judgement is with the benefit of hindsight as he was regarded as hugely promising as a teenager.
He'd be right up there. The actual fee is much higher than you'd think too. Someone once posted a link to the end of year accounts of the club we signed him from and it was way higher than the fee reported by most UK papers.
 

AngeloHenriquez

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
13,647
Location
Location Location
Supports
Stevenage
He'd be right up there. The actual fee is much higher than you'd think too. Someone once posted a link to the end of year accounts of the club we signed him from and it was way higher than the fee reported by most UK papers.
I thought we paid a fee for Ando & 1 Other (Nani I think), so haven't seen it split out, what figures are said to have been paid for Ando alone?
 

KiD MoYeS

Good Craig got his c'nuppins
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
33,164
Location
Love is Blind
Anderson was something like €30 million, wasn't he?

Anyway, he most certainly doesn't deserve another chance. Sell.
 

Stookie

Nurse bell end
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
9,160
Location
West Yorkshire
Please don't let this excuse of a footballer grace a United shirt again. Like one of those turds that will not flush away.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,912
Porto released the fee, it was €30m, Nani was €14m or something.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,287
Location
Not Moskva
Anderson was something like €30 million, wasn't he?

Anyway, he most certainly doesn't deserve another chance. Sell.
I have seen a similar figure. I suppose it was slightly less in sterling terms back in 2007 but it is still shocking. The Fabregas song, the argument that he had all the skills in his locker to become a top class CM....Now he'd be lucky to get an offer from PL basement dwellers.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,964
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Porto released the fee, it was €30m, Nani was €14m or something.
From memory Anderson was > 30m and Nani was in the mid 20s. Both fees in €.

They were hyped up as replacements for Giggs and Scholes, with fees that reflect those expectations. The fact they're so far below the level of the players they were intended to replace is one of the main reasons we're in such a pickle right now.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,581
I clearly remember it as £ 14 million for Nani and £ 17 million for Anderson (+ the big story was that Mendes pocketed 3 million).
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,287
Location
Not Moskva
From memory Anderson was > 30m and Nani was in the mid 20s. Both fees in €.

They were hyped up as replacements for Giggs and Scholes, with fees that reflect those expectations. The fact they're so far below the level of the players they were intended to replace is one of the main reasons we're in such a pickle right now.
It probably deserves a separate thread but the only big money signing of a young player that has definitely worked since 2007 is David de Gea. Jones might still come good (as might Smalling if you regard his signing as big money) but both still have a lot to prove and are currently a long way short of the men they are replacing. In fact, factoring in Berbatov, Hargreaves, Young and Fellaini, it's a pretty grim picture. RVP gave one great season before sinking into the Moyes morass last year (he may come again/stay fit next year), Kagawa has underwhelmed in his 2 years here, whatever the mitigating factors, while Mata should come good (we hope) after a difficult start. All in all, maybe our late, unlamented manager did have a point when he described the scouting system as not fit for purpose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.