Man-United
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2003
- Messages
- 16,281
We should have signed him last year..
It's a good post with some interesting points - you might try tackling some of them instead of just being snotty.
What does Ronaldo have to do with this?
Answer my question seriously, what does Ronaldo have to do with this?Ronaldo has everything to do with everything on this forum, havent you noticed?
Answer my question seriously, what does Ronaldo have to do with this?
Henry keeps fluffing them one on one chances where he curls them now
He made an outstanding pass to Messi yesterday for his goal.The angle was difficult but he pulled it off perfectly
nice location, ROnaldo No.9. Nesta has been brilliant when i've seen him this season. Well all bar one game where he was awful...
anyway, Robinho is heartless. He doesnt give a shit about it. He picks and choses when to turn up which is a shame because ability wise he is right up there.
Henry is finished, i fully expect that to happen with Iniesta wide for a bit. for me Pedro and Bojan are better options that Henry now and if you look at the team they put out, the strongest team they can it doesnt include Henry any more.
Iniesta, Ibrahimovic, Messi
Kieta, Xavi
Busquets/Toure
He's still of use to Barca though, regardless of how much he's declined, because he offers something in behind which is sorely lacking a lot of the time without him(and Eto'o).
Ibrahimovic might've brought another dimension but at the same time they've lost one. They've not added to their play they've just changed it.
He's still of use to Barca though, regardless of how much he's declined, because he offers something in behind which is sorely lacking a lot of the time without him(and Eto'o).
Ibrahimovic might've brought another dimension but at the same time they've lost one. They've not added to their play they've just changed it.
An appalling record corrected you mean?
I thought the tone on here was: "Good player, never scores in an important game or last 16 of the CL, so he can't be that good."
Now he did.
I think it was more "Fantastic player, but hasnt scored in 16 games in the champions league final stages, so despite his talent its hard to pick him as the best striker in the world. Because you know... The champions league final 16 matches are kind of important and as a striker goalscoring is your burden"
He scored today, doesnt matter how it went in. But 1 in 17 sounds better than 0 in 16. Now he just needs to keep it up.
I could dig up posts myself I think, but can't be bothered.
There were several on here basing their opinion on Zlatan purely on the fact that he hadn't scored in the final 16 of the CL. Or atleast they gave that impression.
I could dig up posts myself I think, but can't be bothered.
There were several on here basing their opinion on Zlatan purely on the fact that he hadn't scored in the final 16 of the CL. Or atleast they gave that impression.
It certainly was. Expect those guilty of it to try and deny it though.I thought the tone on here was: "Good player, never scores in an important game or last 16 of the CL, so he can't be that good."
Now he did.