Before the Inter match you weren't saying we were a much better team than them, you were saying it was quite close.
Now you're changing that as an argument for Zlatan, which is silly.
United are a much better football team, they play better football, are more adventurous and have better attackers. Inter are a good side, they got a fright in the first game but in the 2nd half it was even and in the 2nd leg it was fairly even.
United are a better side but it's still close. United are a better footballing side though, no doubt.
and what about the fact he has never scored in a knockout round in the CL?
Circumstance, injury, teams, luck.
Many factors, maybe i'm just making excuses for him because he's one of my favourite players but i don't think it's to do with him being a big time bottler. For a start he played for Ajax who werent very likely to do great things. At Juve i can't remember who he played against apart from Liverpool, the ultimate euro spoilers. He was badly out of form that season due to his bulk. He was made to do alot of gym work but he over did it and wasn't as athletic which is a part of his game.
Then the inter game against Liverpool i thought he did alright, missed a chance but created their best chances, Inter had 10 men for about 120 mins of a 180 min tie, not ideal.
Then United, the best defence in europe, he hit the bar and generally played well in the 2nd leg, he was unlucky. I wouldnt fault Ibrahimovic for Inter not being good enough in europe.