Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
Not sure if serious...Who worked together at Inter?
Not sure if serious...Who worked together at Inter?
Wallace and Gromit.Who worked together at Inter?
It is though, signing any player is a gamble the risk increases the older the player is and doubly so if they have never played in England before, theres no guarantee he would be a success at United if we did sign him.
I assume we all hope he is great if we do sign him, but it's silly to claim this transfer carries no risk.
Shevchenko was arguably the worlds best striker when he moved to England at 29 and he flopped, if that can happen to a player like him in his 20's then it can happen with any player. Yes even Ibrahimovic.
Really thought this whole "they've never played together" thing was a WUMChecked at transfermarkt because I wasn't sure and just overread that column
Still just one year and pretty irrelevant in my opinion. Would be a huge mistake by United.
It's not pretty irrelevant when Zlatan is waxing lyrical about Mourinho in his autobiography though.Checked at transfermarkt because I wasn't sure and just overread that column
Still just one year and pretty irrelevant in my opinion. Would be a huge mistake by United.
Checked at transfermarkt because I wasn't sure and just overread that column
Still just one year and pretty irrelevant in my opinion. Would be a huge mistake by United.
Rashford.You've hit the nail on the head there.
The more I think about it, the more I don't want us to pursue him, especially on the ridiculous wages mentioned. He'd give us one season at a push. I'd much rather we spent big on a young, pacy, powerful forward who will give us many years.
Why huge mistake?
Wages?
We sign him on free?
Physical decline?
Don't score enough goals?
His ego?
Attitude?
Honestly. Please help me out. What part is a bad deal for United?
We've got two of them. Zlatan would be the perfect stop gap whilst they continue to develop.You've hit the nail on the head there.
The more I think about it, the more I don't want us to pursue him, especially on the ridiculous wages mentioned. He'd give us one season at a push. I'd much rather we spent big on a young, pacy, powerful forward who will give us many years.
Try telling that to ZlatanStill just one year and pretty irrelevant in my opinion.
Why huge mistake?
Wages?
We sign him on free?
Physical decline?
Don't score enough goals?
His ego?
Attitude?
Honestly. Please help me out. What part is a bad deal for United?
Falcao - coming off the back of an ACL injury with serious question marks over his ability to return to form
Ibrahimovic - coming off the back of a 51 goal season.
Yea, totally the same.
Maybe the Falcao comparison is not great but the Shevchenko one @stevoc made above is better.
At 35 in an insane team without the slightest of competition in the League. At this age, a career can end in month. Some here really are desperate to have a "Hurr, we are United!"-feeling again...
I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.At 35 in an insane team without the slightest of competition in the League. At this age, a career can end in month. Some here really are desperate to have a "Hurr, we are United!"-feeling again...
Having said that I am increasingly enthusiastic about this transfer. I dont think its risk free by any means, and in fact I think it will make a much smaller impact than many people seem to expect. But I think he'll score enough goals to justify the move, and his presence in the dressing room will be positive.
Having said that I am increasingly enthusiastic about this transfer. I dont think its risk free by any means, and in fact I think it will make a much smaller impact than many people seem to expect. But I think he'll score enough goals to justify the move, and his presence in the dressing room will be positive.
It is low risk, you are right.I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.
It's a very low risk deal, there's no transfer fee involved and it's for one year. If he does arrive and it doesn't work out then oh well, it was worth a shot. If he comes and scores 30 goals in all competitions then awesome.
It's a no brainer.
Rashford.
We've got two of them. Zlatan would be the perfect stop gap whilst they continue to develop.
Don't read it then.
He's a gamble because of his age and that fact he's never played in the PL. It's too easy to underestimate how hard it is to adjust to the league and at very nearly 35 he's left it too late.
How on earth is signing a 35 year old with no PL experience not in some part a gamble? Of course it is.
Mourinho and Ibra have never worked together...
It is low risk, you are right.
What risk there is come from 1) very high wages, meaning this will not be an insignificant outlay, even if there is no transfer fee. And 2) When you have a new player with a big reputation coming from a foreign league, you persevere with them for quite a while, even if they struggle for form at first. We saw that with Falcao, when he started playing and wasnt great, we stuck with him longer than we should. He was a passenger and it was detrimental to the team. If memory serves, Chelsea had a similar experience with Shevchenko - it stands to reason. This is why in some ways getting a player in his peak years and proven in the league would be lower risk.
But yeah, I am in favour of this overall.
Lukaku would probably cost something like £50-60m with how transfer fees are going and the TV money now in the league, Everton can and will demand far more than he's worth, plus there's the fact that he's 23 so will be in the way of Rashford and Martial more long term and to be honest he's good but I don't think he's good enough.Good point. If we're considering Martial to be more of a wide forward than a true striker and expecting Rashford to take time to develop, why not someone like Lukaku? He'll cost more, sure, but he'll give us more bang for our buck.
I just don't think this Zlatan transfer will be as successful as we hope it to be. Will he play the majority of our games, especially if we're competing on 3-4 fronts? Can he stay injury-free at 35? Sure he's a big, strong forward but does he have the legs to run in behind? He's scored a zillion goals in the French league, but as we found out with Memphis, that is by no means a marker of how well he'll do here.
Happy to be proved wrong, and I'll be pleased if we signed him but I won't be jumping from the rooftops.
This is weird...
I don't see a reason why, if we were actually favourites, this hasn't been tied down as yet.. Or at least reported to be close.
He is a free agent so literally an agreement alone is enough. It seems a very simple deal and shouldn't take too long to execute. Presumably zlatan and us would want it to be done sooner too, so with no Confo before the euro announcement, I think we are not favourites.
I don't see a reason why, if we were actually favourites, this hasn't been tied down as yet.. Or at least reported to be close.
He is a free agent so literally an agreement alone is enough. It seems a very simple deal and shouldn't take too long to execute. Presumably zlatan and us would want it to be done sooner too, so with no Confo before the euro announcement, I think we are not favourites.
I don't see a reason why, if we were actually favourites, this hasn't been tied down as yet.. Or at least reported to be close.
He is a free agent so literally an agreement alone is enough. It seems a very simple deal and shouldn't take too long to execute. Presumably zlatan and us would want it to be done sooner too, so with no Confo before the euro announcement, I think we are not favourites.
Sick of seeing this. How on earth is it a gamble? He's one of the top 5 strikers in the world, on a free transfer.
Probably waiting for the Mourinho announcement to settle before we embark on yet another high-profile signing media frenzy. Or maybe we don't want to officially acknowledge that negotiations has taken place before LvG was sacked (even if it's obvious that it has).
Possibly because Mourinho is barely on the job yet.
Why haven't the actual favourites signed him yet?