cpresc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2016
- Messages
- 918
Imagine when osimhem is there instead of him
With Sancho back, Antony back and Garnacho earning more and more trust, Rashford should be our main striker with the others rotating the wings. Weghorst should be what he was loaned to do, plan B and rotate to rest where possible.
And this does make me think, could Rashford be our "number 9" going into next season? And our big signing is another wide forward style player? Is that why we wanted Gakpo? And then sign a back up/rotation option for Rashford upfront? Certainly feels there are more wide forward style attackers than out and out strikers available.
Yeah, that's what I said. A back up/rotation for Rashford. Good shout on Sesko.Even if we ran with Rashford at striker, we'd need to buy another "understudy" type (Sesko possibly). But the only wide forwards I'd want to buy in that case are Mbappe or Kvara. Not sure anyone else is the required level (although I admit I have a soft spot for Mitoma )
But he really might be the least talented forward we've ever had. He's so painfully off the pace.
To the casual observer he seems completely useless. But when you look up close...
...he's completely useless at everything but pressing, holding up play and basic passes. Which is sometimes quite handy. Also he's not injured, 37 or a narcissist.
Agreed yeah, that's why I like him and it's not his fault he's not the quality we need.
You can have players clearly not good enough, like him, but if they are giving it everything they have then you shouldn't get angry at him.
Agreed yeah, that's why I like him and it's not his fault he's not the quality we need.
You can have players clearly not good enough, like him, but if they are giving it everything they have then you shouldn't get angry at him.
You can be fairly angry at the fact we were so mismanaged over the last 'insert years here' that we had to sign him.
Anyway we have a few wingers back now so hopefully he becomes a bench / rotation option which was the intention anyway.
Yeah course but that's not his fault. It's the cnut owners. It's actually ridiculous that we ended up in a position of having to sign him, we've basically been signing stopgap strikers for years. And Weghorst isn't even good enough to be a stopgap.
I think tonight should be the final straw in terms of him starting every game. He's doing his best but he's so far off the standard it's comical. Ten Hag taking him off at HT instead of the usual thing with managers where they wait until the 60th minute was great, too many managers let a game drift.
We never ‘had’ to sign Ten Hag. We found ourselves in a position of needing a short term striker, and we signed Weghorst because our manager fancied him. Which is a poor decision from Ten Hag. But we were not in a position where we ‘had to sign Wout Weghorst’. It was a choice, likely made by the manager.
We never ‘had’ to sign Ten Hag. We found ourselves in a position of needing a short term striker, and we signed Weghorst because our manager fancied him. Which is a poor decision from Ten Hag. But we were not in a position where we ‘had to sign Wout Weghorst’. It was a choice, likely made by the manager.
What was the alternative?
We needed a striker and we had feck all money.
What would you suggest we did?
Sign a better footballer than Wout Weghorst.
Of all the stop gaps mentioned - Morata, Dembele, Memphis, Thuram, Aboubakar - Weghorst is comfortably worse than all of them. And that’s off the top of my head, Weghorst wasn’t even ‘available’, we went to great lengths to get him out of an existing loan. If we were willing to be that creative, I’m certain we could have found a better player. The main problem was in the fact that Ten Hag actually seemed to rate Weghorst.
Sign a better footballer than Wout Weghorst.
Of all the stop gaps mentioned - Morata, Dembele, Memphis, Thuram, Aboubakar - Weghorst is comfortably worse than all of them. And that’s off the top of my head, Weghorst wasn’t even ‘available’, we went to great lengths to get him out of an existing loan. If we were willing to be that creative, I’m certain we could have found a better player. The main problem was in the fact that Ten Hag actually seemed to rate Weghorst.
Ok so it''s the fantasy football angle.
You think we could have got any of them players with no money?
Ok so it''s the fantasy football angle.
No. I suspect we’d have paid, like we did for the striker we did get.
£2.6m for Morata or Marcus Thuram for a 6 month loan?
You think that was doable?
On the spectrum of free loans to £9m for Joao fecking Felix - then yes, although naturally, I can’t tell you what the loan fee would have been. Obviously. However, these are the names we were linked to, presumably because they were available in the short term for less than £10m.
I really don't think we'd have got Morata or Marcus Thuram on a 6 month loan for £2m.
Being linked to them means nothing, we get linked with everyone.
Sign a better footballer than Wout Weghorst.
Of all the stop gaps mentioned - Morata, Dembele, Memphis, Thuram, Aboubakar - Weghorst is comfortably worse than all of them. And that’s off the top of my head, Weghorst wasn’t even ‘available’, we went to great lengths to get him out of an existing loan. If we were willing to be that creative, I’m certain we could have found a better player. The main problem was in the fact that Ten Hag actually seemed to rate Weghorst.
Based on what ? Also what makes you think those clubs would have allowed the player to leave them midseason as they're all important for them or that the player himself would have wanted to come unlike ? Strange view IMHONo. I suspect we’d have paid, like we did for the striker we did get.