Wout Weghorst image 27

Wout Weghorst Netherlands flag

2022-23 Performances


View full 2022-23 profile

5.0 Season Average Rating
Appearances
31
Goals
2
Assists
2
Yellow cards
2
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ffs we could have loaned Mbappe's leg instead of him. We were linked with everyone.
 
If the only point of him playing is to be mobile we might as well stick anyone who can move about a bit up there.

His only attribute aside from that is that he isn’t Ronaldo. He can’t head, he can’t pass, he’s slow and he doesn’t score.
 
Hmm.. there were occasions where our player could have passed to him and didn't. Maybe they don't trust him that much to finish. I think if Bruno passed to him instead of trying to nutmeg the keeper, Weghorst should have scored though. He was on 1v1 situation with the defender behind him and he usually wins in that kind of situation.
 
He looks to me as though he suits a more direct style of play, he’s certainly tall enough to nod the ball in from crosses like a traditional centre forward.

He is but I think I’ve seen him win one header his entire time here, he often doesn’t even attempt for win headers its infuriating.
 
You wouldn't see a club like Barca or Madrid keep him as a "plan B", neither should we.

Hopefully people stop talking about how much impact he has. He tries hard and presses well, great, but he's fecking atrocious as a footballer. It's not a mystery as to why we instantly started dominating Barca that second half

But you would see Barca bring in Luuk de jong on loan, when they cant afford to get a striker.
Same as us. Make no mistake, we got him on loan because thats all we could afford to do in this position and hes the only one available given Ronaldo had to leave, and martials injury.
 
Sign a better footballer than Wout Weghorst.

Of all the stop gaps mentioned - Morata, Dembele, Memphis, Thuram, Aboubakar - Weghorst is comfortably worse than all of them. And that’s off the top of my head, Weghorst wasn’t even ‘available’, we went to great lengths to get him out of an existing loan. If we were willing to be that creative, I’m certain we could have found a better player. The main problem was in the fact that Ten Hag actually seemed to rate Weghorst.

Is this the Aboubakar who was at Al nassr, where Ronaldo went? And who has joined Besikstas to replace Weghorst and seems to be doing worse at Besiktas than Wout was doing?
 
Last time I saw a player so out of their depth was Felliani against Bayern. This isn't his level, his level is a 6-10 ranked European league
 
I slightly feel for him. This opposition was several levels above his own and it would have been abundantly clear to him yesterday. But then again, he got to play Barca at Camp Nou and Old Trafford and that's something most people of his level don't ever get to experience.

I have said this many times: he has too little in his arsenal to be realistically useful for us as a striker. Most teams are simply not threatened by him at all, he needs to played through on goal to score and then he still might not. He lacks acceleration and pace, his heading ability is deceptively bad, his shooting and finishing below par for a striker, his hold up play and his link up are average. Really, what he offers, is work rate and some decent movement. But hat's nowhere near enough at this level.

United cannot really afford to be playing with strikers that don't have the pace to stretch the defence. We are toothless that way. Our game relies heavily on being able to play balls over the defence for players to chase and that can never work with someone like him.

Rashford should play #9 until Martial is back and Wout should only be used to give Rashy breathers. But he should never be a starting XI choice in important fixtures unless every one else is out.
 
He seems to be taken off at half time a lot so ETH is obviously aware Wout is obviously not setting the world alight. But he's getting a start every game. Is it just a ploy. Almost see if we can get ahead in the game playing Wout. If not, throw on some fast effective players like Garnacho etc who instantly up the tempo and change the game. We've seen Garnacho start a few games and he's also struggled. But coming off the bench he is way more effective. We have limited options up front, it seems we have to just get used to seeing Wout start a lot more games until the end of the season.
 
I was all for this loan when it happened. Admittedly didn't watch him much at Burnley but I'm sure I remembered him being thought of as handful for the opposition and a nightmare for defenders whenever we were due to play Burnley. I thought we were getting a target man who would put himself about in the box, win arial duels and chip in with some important goals.

What we have is aplayer who works hard but is not in sync with the rest of the team because he's too slow to keep up with the pace of the football we are playing. Also seems like he is not clinical finisher, and mistimes when he leaps to win headers as he loses more duels than you would think for a 6'5 man.He was a liability last night I was shouting for him to be taken off since all he was doing was losing ariel duels and just running around like a headless chicken he was so easy for barca to take out of the game.

I think could find a big lump who works in the warehouse of screwfix or builders depo and I think they'd do the same job
 
I think the penny finally dropped last night for ten hag with weghorst
 
He was rubbish last night but we still have a lot of games left and can still play a role against weaker opposition. I doubt we'll look to sign him but he's here now and will have a role to play as the season continues.
 
The team improved tenfold getting him off the pitch. You can not have a CF who is not a legitimate goal scoring/creating threat. The opposition CBs can then just press high up against your other forwards.

As soon as they have to worry about a striker on a 1-1 basis (either dropping in and creating, or running in behind) it's a different game.
 
Barca literally moved 15m towards their defence once Rashford replaced him up front and we were allowed to take over possession, it was a different game once we replaced him. You can't have that kind of player in a game like this on the pitch. Luckily Ten Hag replaced him after first 45 minutes.
 
No he's a Championship player. You wouldn't see a club like Barca or Madrid keep him as a "plan B", neither should we.

Hopefully people stop talking about how much impact he has. He tries hard and presses well, great, but he's fecking atrocious as a footballer. It's not a mystery as to why we instantly started dominating Barca that second half

I mean, Real Madrid has Mariano; Barcelona had Martin Brathwaite, who scored 8 in 36 games for Middlesbrough - so yeah, they have/had bad plan B’s too.

He was a cheap, short term loan option, but the difference between us and Real Madrid/Barcelona is that he’s expected to play week in week out as our first choice has been injured for most of the season.

I mean, yes, the alternative is playing Rashford up front - but I understand the hesitation as Rashford was in the form of his life on the left - and in general, plays better there.
 
Is this the Aboubakar who was at Al nassr, where Ronaldo went? And who has joined Besikstas to replace Weghorst and seems to be doing worse at Besiktas than Wout was doing?

Had we signed Aboubakar, the post would have been: Morata, Dembele, Memphis, Thuram, Weghorst - Aboubakar is comfortably worse than all of them
 
I don't agree with this being ignored by his teammate narrative.

IMO, it's more about his positioning and anticipation ability (and his slowness). He's not a good option for playing through behind opponent's defense most of the time, so he's just allow opposition to compact the space around him, which makes it harder to uses him for linking up play despite he has a solid first touch. Even when attacking the box, he can't lose his marker, or quick enough to occupy advantageous attacking position for a cross. So it's very difficult to supply service to him in open play.

Yeah his teammates were desperately feeding him in the Leicester game but he’s just too slow. The sequence where he had a head start but ended up comfortably losing to Christensen in a foot race summed it up.
 
Had we signed Aboubakar, the post would have been: Morata, Dembele, Memphis, Thuram, Weghorst - Aboubakar is comfortably worse than all of them
Reality is our options were limited and shit, we wouldn't have got any of the good players from that list on loan and it's abundantly clear we weren't interested in someone permanent, presumably because that's where a big chunk of our summer budget is going.
 
Some games he has been useful and other games he has been poor. I think one of his best qualities is that he is different and we play differently with him. In so many games since Christmas we have won games due to tactical and personnel changes. Garnacho has been poor whenever he has started but as an impact sub hes great. Sancho is the same at the moment.

There is value to be had by playing in 2 very contrasting ways in order to cause chaos amongst the opposition which they are unable to compensate for. Being one note and the only thing your subs offer is fresh legs isn't enough at the sharp end of football.
 
Had we signed Aboubakar, the post would have been: Morata, Dembele, Memphis, Thuram, Weghorst - Aboubakar is comfortably worse than all of them
Yep, was crazy reading all this today.
Out of all the options, I understand why we went with what we did. It probably ended up being the cheapest and most reliable in terms of what ETH wants to achieve for short term gain.
 
He will still play plenty of games this season. I agree yesterday he shouldn't be starting, but maybe Antony couldn't play for 90 or something.

I expect him to start on Sunday. Game against Newcastle with 17th choice goalkeeper is more his level.
 
I expect him to start on Sunday. Game against Newcastle with 17th choice goalkeeper is more his level.

I will still hope that he doesn't start on Sunday, just like I hoped he wouldn't start yesterday. We're just a more dangerous team without him, he's no threat to a defence. We need him because we need to rotate and rest players, but this is a final. You don't start your rotational, squad players in a final, unless your best XI is unavailable.

He can start the FA Cup game against West Ham in midweek.
 
Last edited:
Good against teams who sit back as a target man, and excellent off the ball. Can be a good 3rd choice striker next season behind Osimhen/Kane and Rashford.

We have good forwards now. Rashford, Martial/new CF, Sancho, Antony, Garnacho, Amad/Pellistri, Weghorst.
 
Good against teams who sit back as a target man, and excellent off the ball. Can be a good 3rd choice striker next season behind Osimhen/Kane and Rashford.

We have good forwards now. Rashford, Martial/new CF, Sancho, Antony, Garnacho, Amad/Pellistri, Weghorst.

Yeah, no. He can go be first striker at Burnley, next season.

If we spend money to sign 31yo Weghorst in the summer, something is terribly wrong. There's significantly better options available on a free.
 
It must come as a shock for opposition defenders when they have to mark Rashford instead of Weghorst. Two completely different players.

Maybe that's one of the reason he starts so many games.
 
He reminds me of myself when I play sunday league. I play upfront too and i'm really shite and no one passes me the ball but I only play because our main striker is a borderline alcoholic and is never available.
 
You are a much better poster than this. We clearly weren’t signing any of those players in January, come on now.

Memphis literally changed clubs, and I believe Aboubakar did too. Moussa Dembele has been available for ages. These players were no less available than Weghorst, who we went and got out of an existing loan deal much to Besiktas’ annoyance.
Based on what ? Also what makes you think those clubs would have allowed the player to leave them midseason as they're all important for them or that the player himself would have wanted to come unlike ? Strange view IMHO

I don’t write the stories - these are the options that were discussed. Not Osimhen or Kane, I’ve hardly listed the cream of European football. Again, some of them actually moved. As did Joao Felix, just to show spectrum here - I’m not even taking about him, but even HE moved on loan! There are a lot of levels in between Joao Felix and Wout Weghorst. Even Chris Wood went on loan and he’s better than Weghorst too.
 
Last edited:
Is this the Aboubakar who was at Al nassr, where Ronaldo went? And who has joined Besikstas to replace Weghorst and seems to be doing worse at Besiktas than Wout was doing?

Yep him, former Porto striker who is a better striker than Weghorst to me.
 
now that Antony is back surely he doesn't need to start most games now going forward. play Rash up top, Sancho Bruno and Antony in behind.
 
Bench on Sunday.

We mightnt see much of him over the final few weeks when ( if) Martial comes back

I thought he would be better
 
Yep him, former Porto striker who is a better striker than Weghorst to me.
He was at Porto three years ago and before 30 ended up in the Saudi Pro League.

I think ill trust ETH over you on this short term signing :)
 
He reminds me of myself when I play sunday league. I play upfront too and i'm really shite and no one passes me the ball but I only play because our main striker is a borderline alcoholic and is never available.
And you remind me of my mate who is so shit that you could not dare to put him anywhere near your goal. The further away the better. So he's our striker. And he only plays because he's our mate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.