Conte doesn’t fit the United way
And for this reason now Rodgers is the choosen one
A front line of Ronnie, Bale and Benzema all at their peak helps.That's not the true sense of the word though, neither have average results at the highest level. Is winning 3CLs and 2 league titles in 4.5 years the average return for Real Madrid? Knowing that no Real Madrid manager has won 2 La Liga titles since Del Bosque in 2001 and 2003.
Now watch us get Brendan fecking Rodgers over Conte, we really are, a joke at this point.
Yes, losing is the United way these days.So Conte doesnt fit the United way, but Ole and Brendan Rodgers do?
A front line of Ronnie, Bale and Benzema all at their peak helps.
Well let us see what He does at his next club then.
Spurs are a better squad than ole is a manager. Easily the worst in the league. So the test would be would conte finish higher than United if he managed a league 2 team.I guess some are more convinced of the value of the manager over that of the players. Who would win over a season, a world class manager with an average squad vs an average manager with world class players?
Weird reaction but okI'd laugh my head of if Conte comes in at Spurs and pips United to 4th place. Although I wouldn't be laughing if we then sacked Solskjaer and got someone like Rodgers.
An argument can be made that the better the player the least the need to be managed and maybe the art of management is to just guide the really good players in the right direction but that style needs top players and that is maybe Zidane's style but not of Benitez who possibly wants to impose himself more on the players.If your goal is to win the CL it does help but you still need to be an above average manager to win the league and 3 times the CL, otherwise Benitez and Ancelotti would have done it. He also won the league without Ronaldo and without peak Bale while reaching the CL semi finals.
I'd laugh my head of if Conte comes in at Spurs and pips United to 4th place. Although I wouldn't be laughing if we then sacked Solskjaer and got someone like Rodgers.
An argument can be made that the better the player the least the need to be managed and maybe the art of management is to just guide the really good players in the right direction but that style needs top players and that is maybe Zidane's style but not of Benitez who possibly wants to impose himself more on the players.
Well I don't think Utd are a team with really good players so that is why I think he would not be a good fit for us.In other words Zidane is a high level manager at the top? Because you see I do believe that different managers excel at different levels, a manager like Favre is excellent with a Europa League team and not so much with a CL and above team. But when it comes to United we are not talking about a midtable team we are talking about a team full of really good players that need to be guided toward the very top of Football which isn't something that an average manager can do and it's not something that they do.
It appears we will have to have drive over the cliff before the board will act.
Yes Dan James, Wan Bissaka, Telles, Van De Beek, Harry Maguire, Pellestri and Amad - those famous shirt sellers you can question our transfer record but you cannot question that we back the manager bringing in players that they want. Just because we've signed some high profile players doesn't mean it was done for shirt sales and against the manager's wishes - almost always the biggest talents and best players are the highest profile players, are you suggesting Conte would be unhappy with us bringing in the biggest talents and best players available?This is why we're not hiring him. Our owners want to continue bleeding the club dry without interference from the manager, and they want to continue signing high profile players who sell shirts rather than players who suit the manager's system. Conte would start questioning the running of the club within a couple of months.
We need to force these parasites out sooner or later as it's the only way we can progress as a club. It's a higher priority than being rid of Ole.
Do a bit more researchRed000012 - Caf is a single poster.
We won the battle but lost the war.
Hope you guys are happy.
Weird reaction but ok
Just too bizarre to even start.
Who are you talking to?We won the battle but lost the war.
Hope you guys are happy.
I just don’t think that’s true. If you knew for a fact that losing a singular game would be better for the club in the long run would you not want them to lose? Maybe Conte isn’t the one you’d want that for. But if you’re dream manager was available and you knew Ole would be sacked and replaced by him, would you not want United to lose that one game?Go support another club then you plastic. If you want us to lose games you're no Utd fan.
I just don’t think that’s true. If you knew for a fact that losing a singular game would be better for the club in the long run would you not want them to lose? Maybe Conte isn’t the one you’d want that for. But if you’re dream manager was available and you knew Ole would be sacked and replaced by him, would you not want United to lose that one game?
You can say ‘no I want us to win every game’ but we aren’t going to and we’re going to lose/draw far more games with Ole in charge.
How have you come to this conclusion? We've played against a team low on confidence and in bad form and it's a formation we have hardly played.It has been accepted on here that 5-3-2 is the way forward. A defensive formation has been accepted under Solskjaer, so that point is now mute when discussing Conte.
I just don’t think that’s true. If you knew for a fact that losing a singular game would be better for the club in the long run would you not want them to lose? Maybe Conte isn’t the one you’d want that for. But if you’re dream manager was available and you knew Ole would be sacked and replaced by him, would you not want United to lose that one game?
You can say ‘no I want us to win every game’ but we aren’t going to and we’re going to lose/draw far more games with Ole in charge.
That's all a big if. Who's to say we'd sack Ole even if we lost vs Spurs. I think maybe 3 games he got are media invention and they're giving him till the end of the season or till top 4 is out of reach. If the board wanted Conte he'd he an United manager alreadyI just don’t think that’s true. If you knew for a fact that losing a singular game would be better for the club in the long run would you not want them to lose? Maybe Conte isn’t the one you’d want that for. But if you’re dream manager was available and you knew Ole would be sacked and replaced by him, would you not want United to lose that one game?
You can say ‘no I want us to win every game’ but we aren’t going to and we’re going to lose/draw far more games with Ole in charge.
Man, get off your high horse. Winning against Spurs is meaninglses when Ole is still here. We might not even get top 4 at this rate, so what benefit would winning against Spurs have for us?Go support another club then you plastic. If you want us to lose games you're no Utd fan.
I wish the Internet was around in the late 80s and early 90s just for the receipts.Tbf to the poster... what else can you do at that point? Missing out on top managers and the CL just because for some reason the board thinks Ole is going to turn into a good manager one day?
Go support another club then you plastic. If you want us to lose games you're no Utd fan.
Man, get off your high horse. Winning against Spurs is meaninglses when Ole is still here. We might not even get top 4 at this rate, so what benefit would winning against Spurs have for us?