Would you take Conte at United?

Would you want Conte at United?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1,013 47.1%
  • No

    Votes: 1,140 52.9%

  • Total voters
    2,153
Status
Not open for further replies.
People crying over Conte going to Spurs... A) Conte and Levy will just not work. Actually, I cannot imagine worse combo than this. Conte will probably be moaning by mid-Jan! B) if Conte wants United job, it would be worth waiting 5 days until we play City as Ole’s job probably depends on this game. If Conte decides to join Spurs prior to that then I don’t know why anybody would be concerned about him as this would mean that he preferred to join Spurs rather than wait a week or two for us to come knocking.

No guarantee we sack Ole if we lose to City. Actually, I think the chance he is getting sacked anytime before Christmas is very small at this point.
 
Mourinho went to Spurs after poor run with United which was preceded with poor start to season at Chelsea. Conte has had 1 below par season in club football in his career (second year at Chelsea).
Just a feeling. If he fails pretty bad at Spurs, I could see his reputation as one manager up there with Pep and Klopp taking a big hit, and him having to take up another job of similar standing with Tottenham's in order to restore that. Failure at another club could hurt him real bad as a manager considering there is already a few questions about his champions league record and the environment in which he won some of his league titles, with his tendency to disagree with club's hierarchy.

All baseless from me though, so don't need to take it any further.
 
Just a feeling. If he fails pretty bad at Spurs, I could see his reputation as one manager up there with Pep and Klopp taking a big hit, and him having to take up another job of similar standing with Tottenham's in order to restore that. Failure at another club could hurt him real bad as a manager considering there is already a few questions about his champions league record and the environment in which he won some of his league titles, with his tendency to disagree with club's hierarchy.

All baseless from me though, so don't need to take it any further.

I don't think Conte would agree to come to Spurs if he hasn't been guaranteed a significant amount of money to spend - quite possibly from selling Kane.
 
The Real Madrid job is the one that damaged Mourinho's reputation which was followed by his meltdown at Chelsea, Mourinho's reputation was pretty damaged when United got him. Conte is in a completely different situation hasn't really had a meltdown yet, furthermore his last job was a big success.

Even at the clubs he's won titles with Conte has had meltdowns, are you forgetting the row with Costa during that first season with Chelsea? Are you forgetting he almost walked out on Inter a few months into the job there as well? He's a ticking time bomb
 
I used to really like Pochettino but I'm starting to think that we did dodge a bullet and that he is the argentine Emery. A decent coach.
Yeah I would certainly be very weary in appointing him now.
 
He's Italian, goes with the territory

Precisely why I don't want him here

People think the Mourinho comparisons are down to style of play or whatever, its not. It's because they're both fecking mental
 
I don't think Conte would agree to come to Spurs if he hasn't been guaranteed a significant amount of money to spend - quite possibly from selling Kane.

Selling Kane to fund a rebuild won’t go THAT far though, considering Conte left Inter because he wants to be somewhere with funds to push for the Champions League. Maybe they’ve found money from somewhere, otherwise I think Conte is making a terrible mistake. However, even with this squad he’ll make Spurs more of a threat to United, Leicester, West Ham, Arsenal.

If its true that he’d take an 18 month contract United should move in. There’s no risk there, just upside given your squad.
 
No guarantee we sack Ole if we lose to City. Actually, I think the chance he is getting sacked anytime before Christmas is very small at this point.

He’s finished if we get done 5-0 at home again.

I don’t really get the fuss over Conte. Better than Ole but short termist. I don’t really think this club is structured for a managerial rotation, though perhaps it should be. I certainly don’t think he’s the answer, and might well be a bullet dodged. We’re not winning the league this season with or without Conte so I don’t think it matters. If it means we get Ten Hag in the summer it’ll be a positive.
 
Now watch us get Brendan fecking Rodgers over Conte, we really are, a joke at this point.
 
No guarantee we sack Ole if we lose to City. Actually, I think the chance he is getting sacked anytime before Christmas is very small at this point.

Yeah, I get the feeling Conte had his eyes on another job so turned down Spuds in the Summer. That job is obviously not available in the foreseeable so he is now backtracking and going to them.
 
Just a feeling. If he fails pretty bad at Spurs, I could see his reputation as one manager up there with Pep and Klopp taking a big hit, and him having to take up another job of similar standing with Tottenham's in order to restore that. Failure at another club could hurt him real bad as a manager considering there is already a few questions about his champions league record and the environment in which he won some of his league titles, with his tendency to disagree with club's hierarchy.

All baseless from me though, so don't need to take it any further.

I don’t really disagree with that. If he fails at Spurs his reputation will take a knock, it won’t be as substantial as in Mourinho’s case though because it will be his first failed job. It’s definitely the most difficult one he has taken, I’m actually a bit surprised he’s up for it but perhaps he wants to manage in England and is aware that he won’t get the job at City/Liverpool/Chelsea as they have top class managers already for the long term and United are committed to Ole.
 
Now watch us get Brendan fecking Rodgers over Conte, we really are, a joke at this point.
If Conte goes to Spurs I'd be surprised. He left Inter cos they wanted to sell players and a lack of investment. Levy would have to match Contes ambitions. Can't see that happening. If he does it won't last long. 6 months.
 
He’s finished if we get done 5-0 at home again.

I don’t really get the fuss over Conte. Better than Ole but short termist. I don’t really think this club is structured for a managerial rotation, though perhaps it should be. I certainly don’t think he’s the answer, and might well be a bullet dodged. We’re not winning the league this season with or without Conte so I don’t think it matters. If it means we get Ten Hag in the summer it’ll be a positive.

We won't lose 5-0 again. You saw the fallout from that game, he shelved hundred of million of pounds worth of his attacking options to pack the defence and eek out results while playing on counter. He's in full survival mode, all the planning about playing expansive fluid football is out of the window.

Not, that our board will ever ask the question to him. Why, spend all of that money, when you are going to resort to 5 at the back with 2DMs in front of them to get results...

This board doesn't have a plan, they'll be forced into making a decision like they always have. Ole will stay, until Top 4 mathematically becomes impossible. At that juncture, they'll panic and appoint whoever is out of job and pretend everything is fine. We are finished.
 
How did you come to the bolded conclusion, there is a lot of things that could affect that decision one of them being money since we just extended the manager and his staff?

And what makes you think that the board and SAF like to view it with a long term approach when the current manager was only an interim appointment and was extended for "only" 3 years based on short term results, if what you say is true Ole would have never been extended and they would have followed the announced long term plan of appointing a DOF and then appointing a head coach during Summer but we both know that it didn't happen that way.

And your last paragraph makes no sense in this context because nothing actually tells you how long Conte or ten Hag will last, I mentioned it earlier but someone like Simeone is now on a full decade at Atletico while having a very similar career to Conte before that, a manager longevity has more to do with relative success and the willingness of his club to accomodate him than it has to do with the manager itself, the same is true for ten Hag who didn't stay much in his previous jobs until Ajax. The second point about that paragraph is that you can't talk about the club having a long term view and put ten Hag in the equation because he is at the opposite end of Ole in terms of Football, if the club was to sack Ole then the long term appointment would be a manager that is a continuation of what Ole has done because the long term view starts in June 2019 not today and we need to make the best of that long term view that's why I said last week that in reality someone like Conte is probably the right appointment and if we want to change things the starting point should be after the current expensive core of this team is out or on the decline, we need to keep in mind that we invested a lot of money in the likes of De Gea, Varane, Maguire, Bruno and Ronaldo these investments aren't part of a rebuilt or a new long term plan, they were made for the present.
Well the short term obvious option for any club who have sacked their manager is Conte, that much is pretty obvious, he's the most established manager available. I thought that is pretty much self evident. Like you say he can easily make his system work with these players, as Ole showed against Spurs, so why haven't we gone for him already?

I'm not sure what your opinion is really, whether you think the board are short-term thinkers or long-term. You seem to be claiming they are short-term? I don't agree, at all.

Ole made them believe he was the right man for the job, the entire country were encouraging them to give him a full time contract and they did so after an excellent initial spell as caretaker. They've then done what they want to do and back him, with a long term view that he will bring success in time. They've said pretty much this a number of times and have just given him a three year new deal, pretty obvious they are trying to play the long ball game with Ole.

Of course no appointment has a guaranteed shelf life, but the intention for it to be a long term appointment can and does effect the selection process. If we hired Conte tomorrow it would be viewed as a decision to gain quick results with a likely short term appointment.
If we hired Ten Haag tomorrow people would rightly expect a transition period with a view to seeing results in time, therefore a longer term approach. But the time it takes varies, there's no definitive.

I'd rather we transition to a different style so I'd rather Ten Haag to Conte. Because I prefer the formers style of football.
 
Even at the clubs he's won titles with Conte has had meltdowns, are you forgetting the row with Costa during that first season with Chelsea? Are you forgetting he almost walked out on Inter a few months into the job there as well? He's a ticking time bomb

No I'm not forgetting a manager being upset with an unprofessional player and no I'm not forgetting the manager being upset with untrustworthy owners. I don't call either of these things meltdowns because in both case it never affected his ability to do his job at a high level. Similarly I don't consider SAF having a meltdown when he was upset with Keane or when he was on a feud regarding Rock of Gibraltar.

Edit: One thing that is true about him is that he is a drama queen but it doesn't prevent him from doing his job, the same applies to Tuchel.
 
Last edited:
No guarantee we sack Ole if we lose to City. Actually, I think the chance he is getting sacked anytime before Christmas is very small at this point.
No guarantee whatsoever but worth waiting 5 days!
 
Well the short term obvious option for any club who have sacked their manager is Conte, that much is pretty obvious, he's the most established manager available. I thought that is pretty much self evident. Like you say he can easily make his system work with these players, as Ole showed against Spurs, so why haven't we gone for him already?

I'm not sure what your opinion is really, whether you think the board are short-term thinkers or long-term. You seem to be claiming they are short-term? I don't agree, at all.

Ole made them believe he was the right man for the job, the entire country were encouraging them to give him a full time contract and they did so after an excellent initial spell as caretaker. They've then done what they want to do and back him, with a long term view that he will bring success in time. They've said pretty much this a number of times and have just given him a three year new deal, pretty obvious they are trying to play the long ball game with Ole.

Of course no appointment has a guaranteed shelf life, but the intention for it to be a long term appointment can and does effect the selection process. If we hired Conte tomorrow it would be viewed as a decision to gain quick results with a likely short term appointment.
If we hired Ten Haag tomorrow people would rightly expect a transition period with a view to seeing results in time, therefore a longer term approach. But the time it takes varies, there's no definitive.

I'd rather we transition to a different style so I'd rather Ten Haag to Conte. Because I prefer the formers style of football.

The board are no thinkers. And your last point is where I am and why I prefer ten Hag, despite the question marks, it has nothing to do with long term vs short term and we don't need to justify our stylistic preferences with notions that have no reality in sport.
 
Selling Kane to fund a rebuild won’t go THAT far though, considering Conte left Inter because he wants to be somewhere with funds to push for the Champions League. Maybe they’ve found money from somewhere, otherwise I think Conte is making a terrible mistake. However, even with this squad he’ll make Spurs more of a threat to United, Leicester, West Ham, Arsenal.

If its true that he’d take an 18 month contract United should move in. There’s no risk there, just upside given your squad.
That's what the Tories said about Brexit.
 
I think the chance he gets sacked without us having someone sensible lined up is slim, as it should be

Plenty of sensible options out there. It’s incredibly easy to improve on who we have, but I’ve seen your posts elsewhere and I have no interest in arguing with you, with all due respect.
 
I don't think Conte would agree to come to Spurs if he hasn't been guaranteed a significant amount of money to spend - quite possibly from selling Kane.
That makes no sense given the length of contact is being reported as everywhere as only until end of next season. Why would you sell Kane to fund someone you only see as a short term appointment?
 
Plenty of sensible options out there. It’s incredibly easy to improve on who we have, but I’ve seen your posts elsewhere and I have no interest in arguing with you, with all due respect.

You think that there is plenty of sensible options? I genuinely struggle to find one.
 
Well, there goes our only hope. Stuck with that useless piece of driftwood as manager till the end of time now. Ole-inners get what they want; the club achieves nothing in the next 5 years as Ole hugs his wheel and gets trumped by Spurs of all things. Lad's, it's Man United.
 
He is going to Spurs who have sacked their manager after being 2 points behind us.
 
You think that there is plenty of sensible options? I genuinely struggle to find one.

Zidane is not interested apparently, but I am not confident we actually tried, or tried enough.

Mancini and Luis Enrique are both options that we can try to get. The word in the media seems like we didn’t approach either. I am not convinced that a national team manager won’t be tempted by the United job with the right charm offensive (and compensation).

Conte is fantastic. I don’t buy into this short term issue. All managers are short term till they earn the chance to be long term. I don’t mind his football and I don’t think anything we’ve showed in the past 3 years is better than anything his teams over the years have shown. He’s demanding and confrontational? So are Pep and Tuchel. It’s not enough of an issue. These people are basically saying that they wouldn’t have hired Tuchel after PSG because at that point he had fallen out publicly with PSG and Dortmund.

Even someone like Potter, while certainly not first choice for me, but might be worth trying on an 18 months contract to see what he can do.

To me, persisting with Ole at this point is not just wrong, it will actually hurt us long term. I didn’t think he should get the job long term before the end of the season when he was interim, or he should be renewed for 3 years on the back of losing the EL final, and I certainly don’t think he should be in a job any longer, not even a day longer. The difference between our quality of squad and quality of manager is so stark, it’s unreal how anyone can’t see it.
 
Zidane is not interested apparently, but I am not confident we actually tried, or tried enough.

Mancini and Luis Enrique are both options that we can try to get. The word in the media seems like we didn’t approach either. I am not convinced that a national team manager won’t be tempted by the United job with the right charm offensive (and compensation).

Conte is fantastic. I don’t buy into this short term issue. All managers are short term till they earn the chance to be long term. I don’t mind his football and I don’t think anything we’ve showed in the past 3 years is better than anything his teams over the years have shown. He’s demanding and confrontational? So are Pep and Tuchel. It’s not enough of an issue. These people are basically saying that they wouldn’t have hired Tuchel after PSG because at that point he had fallen out publicly with PSG and Dortmund.

Even someone like Potter, while certainly not first choice for me, but might be worth trying on an 18 months contract to see what he can do.

To me, persisting with Ole at this point is not just wrong, it will actually hurt us long term. I didn’t think he should get the job long term before the end of the season when he was interim, or he should be renewed for 3 years on the back of losing the EL final, and I certainly don’t think he should be in a job any longer, not even a day longer. The difference between our quality of squad and quality of manager is so stark, it’s unreal how anyone can’t see it.

Based on that you have Conte and Potter, seemingly only Potter. Mancini and Luis Enrique aren't leaving their countries until the WC is over
 
He’s making it sound so ominous. Like what’s going to happen, is he going execute a couple of underperforming players just show that he’s arrived?

He will pick the biggest guy among them and shank him
 
He’s making it sound so ominous. Like what’s going to happen, is he going execute a couple of underperforming players just show that he’s arrived?

I think Kane needs to prepare.
 
Find it funny how there was all this talk of Solskjær being sacked last week and he was clear favourites to and conte taking over.. yet Solskjær is the one who’s got another manager sacked and conte looks like replacing him :lol: the way I see it is if we really wanted conte we’d of sacked Solskjær because conte was available and ready… we obviously don’t want conte and they have another manager lined up maybe for next season… possibly ten Haag. Although Rodgers has gone favourites now to be the next manager
 
Status
Not open for further replies.