A seriously poor review of what I said. Re-fresh your mind to when Pep took over, year one he just about finished 4 and had a squad of aging stars whos impact was declining game on game. Yes, Silva and Augero survived, but a re-build was needed so he dipped into the market and spent millions on players. Sitting here discussing how much he spent and how is irrelevant, he went on to smash the points record, goals scored record in the next two season and raised the bar in the league. He totally refreshed that team with a style of football, England was not used to. His latest challenge is to re-build again as Liverpool and Klopp added to the bar. This take me to the point of Klopp, yes he took slightly longer to demonstrate success (trophies) but by his 3rd year, he had taken City to the wire and recorded the highest 2nd place finish in the premier league (Ole is in his 3rd year now). In the previous years, he style of play was in transition - he joined Liverpool with the ambition to play high intensity football for 90 minutes, tiring the opponent and hitting them hard on the break for 6. His style was evident from day one and even with players such as Dossana, Clyne etc. Now if you look back at Liverpool now and in May 2016, the style of play is very similar, Klopp has his way of playing and that stuck. He brought players who were good enough to play his system, exactly they way he wanted to and he never sat up all night worrying about how he must adjust to the opposition - it feels like Ole does this rather than focus on Uniteds identity.
I saw what Chelsea have done over the summer but let's straighten things out, what Lampard was doing from the day he took over was building a team ethos built on the way he likes to play. He couldnt spend any money on players to fix a team that lost there best player so instead focussed on developing youth, squad mentality, drive, determination and attacking spirit. He finished 4th and got to the FA Cup final, beating United in the Semi. Lampard has used the blue print from his first season to take Chelsea to the next level, yes he spent some money on players, but like for like, it is probably a similar investment to what Ole has spent too. Let's take it a few months into the season, Chelsea have a strong defence, scoring goals for fun and the players look happy. They should have beaten Spurs had Jose not brought his bus to the game. He may not win a trophy this season, but his 3rd campaign is really looking fruitful if he manages to build on what he has done.
I really wont go into detail on Spurs, but to summarise, Jose struggled when he first took over. He then spent 50ish million in the summer window and carried on his good form from the back end of last season. Yes his style of play is dull, that is a separate discussion, but his philosophy is clear - win at all costs, minimise any risk by making the defence a rock.
Translate the above to Ole - he took over and won 10 games on the bounce until March time. Then from March 2019 to Feb 2019, results were really inconsistent, no style of play was formed, he kept changing formation. Then we got a few on the bounce before COVID. We then come back after lockdown and he takes the league by storm by getting 5 or 6 victories on the bounce and then the last 2 or 3 games, you see the same cracks starting to appear. He does not get the player he wants (Sancho) but get's a brilliant DVB and Cavani in the window. he starts the season tinkering his formation, we scraped a victory at Brighton, smashed by Spurs, drew at home to Chelsea, lost at home to Arsenal and Palace, and beat Newcastle (we were awful until 80th min but we score 3 goals on the break from the 86th min). I cannot express enough how inconsistent he is and that is expressed in tactics, identity, philosophy, results, body language, press conference speaking's etc.
I apologise for the essay, but honestly, if you are going to provide an opinion on my post, don't provide lazy unjustified responses without looking at both qualitative and quantitative facts.