This pre-defined style of play non sense really needs to stop.
Pep was ridiculed for imposing that style of play in his first season and everyone felt that you need to tweak the style based on the players you have, and those players were clearly not what Pep had been used to despite having spent close to 200M in his first summer. Almost 280M GBP later, he managed to play that way and win the title comfortably.
Klopp started off with a ridiculously high line of football, and Sevilla destroyed them in EL final. He still did not learn, and it was only when Spurs destroyed them in that first half, did they change their system. So people saying that Klopp had imposed a system there from the get go need to compare their play style in his initial couple of seasons and now. Additionally, Klopp learnt from his mistakes as his sides were burning out in December with that style of play. He realized that in his 3rd winter. Oh and did I forget he needed to spend 400M to impose a title challenge?
Ole has been here close to 2 years now (22.5 months to be precise), and there have been improvements in a lot of the departments. We aren't relying on a target man, and playing long. We play out from the defence and our Wingbacks more often than not make an overlapping run to provide width (depending on opposition). Our defence has been really good - we may have had some brainfarts vs Arsenal and Istanbul - but we restricted Leipzig, PSG, Everton, Chelsea to 2 goals (1 of them being an own goal) and apart from the PSG game, Dave didn't really have much to do. Hell, if I'm to go to stats, it was 3 saves in total vs the last 3 opponents and 7 in total if you include the PSG game.
No one's saying that there isn't scope for improvement, but discrediting Ole and the progress we've made on the back of 2 defeats is stupid, especially when he beat PSG 2 weeks ago and Leipzig 1 week ago