Zlatan 7
We've got bush!
- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 12,343
So what is he not good atWe didn't dominate but we completely shut down their game for which i said that Ole is good at.
So what is he not good atWe didn't dominate but we completely shut down their game for which i said that Ole is good at.
It’s like trench warfare ....both sides digging inI’d love to see a timeline of votes and %s, mapped against key results.
We dominated the first half but were knackered in the second. We dominated in chances and shots and managed to keep defensive control when they had more possession. Considering the praise Everton got after their start to the season, you’d think more people would be pleased with how we played today.We didn't dominate the game today. We were just super compact and organized well in second half. I mean we didn't really them. It was a compact, tight and well professional performance for most part.
If Ole after these 100 games had established a defined style of play like Klopp did, I'm sure more people will support him
We dominated the first half but were knackered in the second. We dominated in chances and shots and managed to keep defensive control when they had more possession. Considering the praise Everton got after their start to the season, you’d think more people would be pleased with how we played today.
The delusion of some of these Ole In people is something else.
If two years is not enough for you to realise the guy does not know how to design and execute an attacking play style where we dominate and consistently win against the small clubs, how long do you think he needs?
We have a relatively young squad but it's at a stage where we should be winning things. If we don't get rid of him, we'll be at the rebuild stage before we can challenge for the league.
He's consistently inconsistent and for that he should be let go. We have a much better squad that he can manage.
To play devils advocate...
Would you take a 1-0 defeat in Sunday if it meant he got sacked straight after and Pochettino was brought in.
The alternative is a win/draw and Ole lives to fight another season with the same old shite we've seen for the last 2 seasons.
I disagree. If that were true we'd be seeing more unique people coming out with reverts but it's not. It's the same group making multiple posts (empty pots.. et al). It is knee jerk and hardly consistent if views are not changed after multiple evidence to the contrary.
I’m not sure you know what knee jerk means at this point.
For a second, I thought you finally found out what knee jerk meant. It appears you're still struggling to grasp the concept.Take a day off. I understand you must be frustrated we won.
Not bare minimum, surely? City are a bit inconsistent as well, by the way. We spent modestly this window, despite recognised weaknesses in the squad so it’s odd to argue about spend just now.
Still, the inconsistency is infuriating at times. But take into account the late start to the season, enforced changes and uneven quality of the squad then it is not a shock at all.
pre today’s win
... sack 1329 votes
... keep 1869 votes
Currently
... sack 1329 votes
... keep 1875 votes
Issue is he is a survivor of the low standards at United. If he was a survivor of the standards of Real Madrid, yes it would be a great quality.A trait you should want in any leader.
For a second, I thought you finally found out what knee jerk meant. It appears you're still struggling to grasp the concept.
How do we get Woodward sacked?
Eh? I'd never heard of you before a few days ago until you embarrassed yourself claiming everyone was being super mean to Ole (without any actual evidence) and pretending to know what knee jerk meant. It is literally the opposite of knee jerk when people are still unhappy despite winning. It seems you still don't know what it means. Anyone with a braincell can see this result is part of the boom bust cycle we used to take the piss out of scousers for. I'm happy to win but feck am I gonna get giddy for when we'll just end up rolling over against WBA in a few weeks. And come again, who was it that first dug the old post?
You must be really gutted we won today digging up old posts to get in personal digs having nothing to do with today's match. But hey if that's what keeps you up at night so be it. Cheers.
Eh? I'd never heard of you before a few days ago until you embarrassed yourself claiming everyone was being super mean to Ole (without any actual evidence) and pretending to know what knee jerk meant. It is literally the opposite of knee jerk when people are still unhappy despite winning. It seems you still don't know what it means. Anyone with a braincell can see this result is part of the boom bust cycle we used to take the piss out of scousers for. I'm happy to win but feck am I gonna get giddy for when we'll just end up rolling over against WBA in a few weeks. And come again, who was it that first dug the old post?
I don't know why people keep saying this but we do have a defined style of play.If Ole after these 100 games had established a defined style of play like Klopp did, I'm sure more people will support him
Yeah maybe. I’m on the edge of agreeing with you. I’m not quite convinced that any so-called superior tactician that we are able to hire would actually fare better in the long term. Maybe.In an ideal world, you'd want your players consistently performing to a level that reflects their cost. It doesn't work that way, of course. Some meet expectations, some exceed them, and some fail to deliver. It's, what, 50-50 (a guess on my part) on whether a player will succeed at his new club, the probability of success rising with their cost. The trouble is, we haven't recruited a single-player post-SAF that has performed anywhere close to their transfer market cost besides Bruno. Something like 30 players with only one of them proving to be an unequivocal success, and in that time we've spent north of £1 billion on new players. In lies the problem.
We're just as unpredictable now as we have been at any point post-SAF. Ole has built our best team in the post-SAF era, on paper at least, but he seems to be incapable of motivating to perform consistently well every week, just like LVG and Jose before him. For me, he's reached his limit on far he can take this team, maybe it's time to step aside and allow a superior tactician to lead them forward.
Not aiming this at you but I am sick of reading about klopp and how you could “see what he was trying to do” or his “style of play” it’s absolute bollocks. They had potential, they where hit and miss then they spent massive on a keeper and VVD. Surprise surprise they become really good. They won’t be as good this year without VVD I assure you. All I could see prior to these signings was celebrating draws with West BromIf Ole after these 100 games had established a defined style of play like Klopp did, I'm sure more people will support him
Incredible to see that. Be interesting to see Klopps performance in the following 50 or 100 games since then.
. No way?? Ha ha. Really? Wow, poor poor guy. Was it at least before or after he did job with the girl? But man, i bet that she told everybody that. I don't know him but i really feel sorry for him.
I honestly can't remember how Liverpool were playing in his second season. He improved on his first years league position from 8th to 4th... but only got that by one point with a win on last day of season.If Ole after these 100 games had established a defined style of play like Klopp did, I'm sure more people will support him
26 W, 14 D, 10 L so don't think it was shit first 50 then some huge jump up next 50...Or even interesting to see a break down in record over the first 50 games versus records in games 51-100. Maybe Klopp really struggled in his first full season (say his first 40-50 games), perhaps more than Ole, but in his second/third he drastically improved.
Not aiming this at you but I am sick of reading about klopp and how you could “see what he was trying to do” or his “style of play” it’s absolute bollocks