sdb4884
Full Member
Now is the time to move him on and get Poch. We won't though and likely be in a similiar or worse position next season.
I like your enthusiasm and loyalty, but to stake that we win the game 9/10 is absurd, and papering over cracks
I am inplay bettor and the only team that were ever 9/10 to win were seville near the end.
Even leading one nil we were nowhere near 9/10.
.
Klopp's net spend is something like £60m since he took over, and he inherited a worse squad than Ole did.You can give credit to Klopp on how he has got them playing but he too had to spend money to get his team how he wants it.
Your nearly every post is based on personal attacks. Didn't you said that you will take a break from this thread? Even hard core cultist like you need a break.You are totally correct.
Sadly being honest about OGS is something the OleOut mafia find very difficult to do.
Klopp's net spend is something like £60m since he took over, and he inherited a worse squad than Ole did.
Why do people continue to compare the two? One is one of the best managers of his generation, the other is.. Ole.
Klopp's net spend is something like £60m since he took over, and he inherited a worse squad than Ole did.
Why do people continue to compare the two? One is one of the best managers of his generation, the other is.. Ole.
I think it’s that we are papering over the cracks, the league campaign wasn’t strong given the competition
That was my point, though. Vastly different circumstances and quality of manager so trying to justify Ole's spending vs Klopp is daft.Not comparing the two, but that's not the best comparison. If you have maintained a decent wage structure, you're going to get good value on transfers - they managed to sell some really shit players for 20m or so. Thanks to the wages we're giving, none of Lingard, AP, Jones, etc. would go for that amount and they are much better players than the dross Klopp sold
Oh here we go, now it's comparing their first first full season. Fecking hell.His net spend is actually around the £100m mark.
He inherited a worse squad and took him 3 seasons to build it.
Ole has been given one season.
So does net spend mean he didnt spend money? They got £140m for Coutinho which Barca got robbed.
Ole net spend is £100m and he finished 3rd with 3 semi finals. What did Klopp achieve in his first season?
Oops. Edited my earlier post. I meant comparing the net spends is not the best comparison hereThat was my point, though. Vastly different circumstances and quality of manager so trying to justify Ole's spending vs Klopp is daft.
Now is the time to move him on and get Poch. We won't though and likely be in a similiar or worse position next season.
That was my point, though. Vastly different circumstances and quality of manager so trying to justify Ole's spending vs Klopp is daft.
Oh here we go, now it's comparing their first first full season. Fecking hell.
Yeah ok mate, Ole and Klopp should be compared, as such, I fully expect us to reach the CL final next year, win a CL title in two years, and win the PL within three with nearly 100 points. I can't wait!
I actually agree on the EL being of little consequence. I know it's a trophy and we should aim to win as many as we can but hopefully this loss can put even more pressure on the board to get Sancho.Why are people so worked up? I thought this was a pointless competition or does that analogy apply only while belittling what Jose did. Anyway we are already in the CL so people need to chill and hope for improvements next term.
Yeah, so... if you're using Klopp's spending as an example as to why Ole needs to spend, that's called a comparison.I didn't compare him, you are the one who started the comparison.
I said he is a top top coach. So success has to be 100 points? Does that make fergie a bad manager?
No one is saying Ole is Klopp, all I said was even Klopp had to spend money to get where he is.
Yeah, so... that's called a comparison.
Not nearly as much as Ole!Klopp has had money to spend
Can you extrapolate on why you say this?
I'd love some insight into this way of looking at the team as a whole, the results - primarily in 2020, the academy talent developing and the prospect of new signings in the transfer window.
What about this team is it that makes you think we will be worse off next season?
There is so much knee-jerking going on every time we lose a game, or even draw, but everyone are awfully quiet when we win.
We have lost TWO games of football in 2020. Two semi finals in cups. Something to note: The loss against Sevilla is one of the greatest football robberies of 2020. They scored on both their chances after grieveous personal mistakes from our defenders, vs our 10 qualfieid BIG scoring chances and the 7 shots that didnt hit the target.
Yesterday was a cannonade against Sevilla, it didnt go our way, "Hire Poch". What the actual hell could Poch have done about last night? Subbed Rashford off earlier, and what would that possibly have accomplishes? Remember last time Dan James came on as a sub? He was AWFUL, but now he's the solution fo sho all of a sudden?
It pisses me off to no end that we still have fans that have seen whats' happened with this team the past 8 months and you are somehow not bloody enthusiastic about the future. HOW is that actually possible? Please explain to me how you can be so massively negative after a GOOD season amidst a goddamn squad rebuild.
Not nearly as much as Ole!
Why do people continue to compare the two? One is one of the best managers of his generation, the other is.. Ole.
Wtf are you on about? You act as if results don't matter when they clearly do.Credit for the post. I gave up months ago. Came to conclusion that most of the posters were ashamed to have Molde coach at that helm and still can’t switch off. Can’t analyze, don’t watch the games, only see the results. The newbies read all the negativity and try to make impression of die hard Reds throwing insults at the team and the manager.
Solskjaer is not a trendy, hipster coach in Klopp (Nagelsmann whatever) mould. Young fans can’t forgive him that.
No they won’t.
We've peaked? With one of the youngest (average age) starting XI's in club football right now we've peaked? Do you even think about what you're typing?We would still struggle to make top 4 and play exactly as we played tonight. This is the best we will get. We’ve peaked.
We would still struggle to make top 4 and play exactly as we played tonight. This is the best we will get. We’ve peaked.
I genuinely don't understand the wailing and gnashing of teeth on here over yesterday. We played well, and should have taken our chances and there were periods in the game where our inexperience showed. But we did play well. When their keeper is getting MOTM, you know that it just isn't going to be your day. I'd understand the emotional responses to the game if we were flat like we were against Copenhagen or Lask, but I thought for decent stretches of the match we were more than decent.
Also I'd rather they learned from these mistakes and missed opportunities now, than have a rude awakening in the CL next season and tbh, I think a trophy might well have papered over the cracks (as much as I would have loved Ole to have won one this season). Klopp had two golden opportunities in his first season to win something and proceeded to lose both of them as well. Shit happens.
Except that's just not true. Klopp had built a really good team by his 2nd full season at the club.I think the point is that, if it took until his 4th season for one of the best managers of his generation to build a really good team, its somewhat unfair to expect Ole to do it in half that time.
I'm not blaming Ole for anything, I'm saying comparisons between his and Klopp's spend are irrelevant.You are going by net spend. It isnt Ole's fault that the club cannot get the same value Liverpool's board gets for their players?
Or are you going to blame that on Ole too?
Liverpool 16/17 - £72m
Liverpool 17/18 - £156m
Liverpool 18/19 - £163m
That is a total of £391m compared to £200m Ole has spent so far.
I'm not blaming Ole for anything, I'm saying comparisons between his and Klopp's spend are irrelevant.
And I don't think Ole has bought particularly well. Bruno is great but the others leave a lot to be desired for what they cost us. Maguire is the only one of the three that's likely good enough (just about) for a team that wants to challenge, and he cost a fecking fortune.
Absolutely, totally agree on all counts. It's a young team which is still experiencing growing pains, and there are some in there who are good up to a certain point but not to the level that is required. It's those players who need to be improved on by having better quality alternatives who can demote them to squad player status.For me, because we qualified for CL and what not, the game yesterday was more about performance. Sevilla are sort of the team we will get drawn in the group stages in pot 3/4. it showed that we have the ability to beat these teams but we have to be switched on and clinical.
It was our best game since Brighton. This season has been a very good learning curve for the players and manager.
The feck are you on about? I already said Bruno was great.So it is Ole's fault we spend so much money? Bruno cost £45m rising to £60m and he is not good enough?
He has bought much better than any other manager has in the last 7 years.
Except that's just not true. Klopp had built a really good team by his 2nd full season at the club.
I would expect Ole to have built a good team by next season, not necessarily a title winning side but one capable of at least getting a solid points total (75+), a decent CL run, and actually getting past a semi final would be nice, too. Anything less will be a failure.
Absolutely, totally agree on all counts. It's a young team which is still experiencing growing pains, and there are some in there who are good up to a certain point but not to the level that is required. It's those players who need to be improved on by having better quality alternatives who can demote them to squad player status.
The crucial thing is, that Ole needs to be properly backed in the market the way Jose and LvG were. Nothing less will suffice.
Ok I get it people are upset we lost yesterday but why change facts.I'm not blaming Ole for anything, I'm saying comparisons between his and Klopp's spend are irrelevant.
And I don't think Ole has bought particularly well. Bruno is great but the others leave a lot to be desired for what they cost us. Maguire is the only one of the three that's likely good enough (just about) for a team that wants to challenge, and he cost a fecking fortune.
The feck are you on about? I already said Bruno was great.
No it's not strictly Ole's fault but he sanctions that transfers and he decided Maguire was worth the £80m vs other, potentially cheaper targets. You have to consider the fact that there was a budget last summer and he chose to spend almost all of it on 2 overpriced defenders. Maguire you could probably overlook because he'll be good enough here long term but AWB just doesn't look like a full back you want at a top club. James is just shite.